EA/Bioware in Full PR Damage Control Mode *UPDATED 3/22/12, 5:28 PM UTC/GMT -4 hours*
#451
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 03:58
#452
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 03:58
Bigdoser wrote...
Yup I told my elder brother and some of my friends not to buy mass effect 3 and oh boy they do listen to my gaming advice.
Same here. Only it was my dad,my brother,and a friend.
Please people hold the line until we get something other then what could be PR spin.
The first thnig we should buy from bioware should be new endings DLC,we should get what they told us would be in the game in the first place.
Hold the line as long as it takes people.
#453
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 03:59
There's no "maybe he did, maybe he didn't" about it. The man lied. Period. He promised things that he did not deliver. Tell him to stop lying if you don't want people calling him a liar.RocketManSR2 wrote...
NubXL wrote...
Hudson's statement is rather disgusting. The man completely and utterly lied to us over and over leading up to launch. Promising grandiose, complex endings where our decisions over the course of 5 years would culminate into one of numerous finales. Couldn't have delivered something more contrary if he tried.
Stop accusing the devs of lying. That is just the opposite of what we need to be doing, damn it.
Modifié par NubXL, 17 mars 2012 - 03:59 .
#454
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 03:59
#455
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 03:59
atghunter wrote...
yuncas wrote...
You know this is actually wearing away a little at my tried and true cynicism. I've never seen firsthand how social media can make waves like this.
You haven't seen it much because it is a fairly new aspect of the PR corporate paradigm. Imagine chess with all it's known gambits, and suddenly someone introduces a new piece. May make for a terrible ending of a mass effect game, but makes for a fascinating possible bellweather change in the consumer/producer marketplace.
Exactly. I'm actually very interested to see how this will pan out. Your blitzkrieg comparison, I don't think I could have come up with a better way to describe it if I had a month to sit and think about it.
#456
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:01
Nafzger wrote...
FugitiveMind wrote...
I'm pleasantly surprised how nice it has to have a PR guy on this side of the fence for once. It's refreshing for us as well as educational. It's wonderful to know what is REALLY going on and more importantly WHY.
With the post late on a Friday, some people who will remember (I'm old, and it's St Patricks Day, I'll be lucky if I remember my name) should get some links ready to forward to appropriate parties Monday morning so they don't get lost and buried as I imagine is hoped.
As far as the "Tell us what you want in the ending" bit, I can't help but think this is more PR...
(because I've been a massive conspiracy theorist since this whole thing started)
On the surface it looks like "help us help you"
But the more I look at it, the more I think they want us to start putting out ideas and then start arguing over them amongst ourselves.
Deflect the non-quality ending topic by making us infight on what it should have been (because this is the internet, that's what happens here)
Then as that arguement gains steam, the original rage can just fade away
TREAD LIGHTLY MY FRIENDS
DAMN YOU, KROGAN!
What did I do??
#457
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:01
I never met the guy, but our movement is obviously getting "around".
#458
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:02
NubXL wrote...
There's no "maybe he did, maybe he didn't" about it. The man lied. Period. He promised things that he did not deliver. Tell him to stop lying if you don't want people calling him a liar.RocketManSR2 wrote...
NubXL wrote...
Hudson's statement is rather disgusting. The man completely and utterly lied to us over and over leading up to launch. Promising grandiose, complex endings where our decisions over the course of 5 years would culminate into one of numerous finales. Couldn't have delivered something more contrary if he tried.
Stop accusing the devs of lying. That is just the opposite of what we need to be doing, damn it.
If you insist on doing that, please leave the topic.
#459
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:02
#460
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:02
#461
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:02
#462
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:02
It really shows how little they think of us to try to bury this late on a Friday night. Reference two sources that thinks they actually did ok and then write us off as the other, out of step, "some."
#463
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:02
I'd rather you stop avoiding reality, for your own sake. Playing ostrich will get you nowhere.RocketManSR2 wrote...
NubXL wrote...
There's no "maybe he did, maybe he didn't" about it. The man lied. Period. He promised things that he did not deliver. Tell him to stop lying if you don't want people calling him a liar.RocketManSR2 wrote...
NubXL wrote...
Hudson's statement is rather disgusting. The man completely and utterly lied to us over and over leading up to launch. Promising grandiose, complex endings where our decisions over the course of 5 years would culminate into one of numerous finales. Couldn't have delivered something more contrary if he tried.
Stop accusing the devs of lying. That is just the opposite of what we need to be doing, damn it.
If you insist on doing that, please leave the topic.
#464
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:03
Still gonna play ME3 because everything except the last bit is amazing. I'm holding the line.
But I'll keep playing ME3. The more I do, the more I'll be reminded of just how much of an eff up the ending was compared to the rest of the series.
And that'll keep my anger burning.
I will hold the line.
Modifié par Jonathan Shepard, 17 mars 2012 - 04:04 .
#465
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:03
But - I'm a weed, in the end I don't give up. As was posted in one of the original posts, I also noticed how quickly people can be appeased by small gestures - such as the free weekend and what not and I personally find it sad to see - but my opinion is just that.
I for one know a growing group of people that stands by their decision and consequences - showing it in reselling games, refusing to buy DLC or future products and even cancelling their subscriptions with BW's MMO.
Yes, I am one that is unhappy with how it ended, I feel cheated and betrayed and while that is a very emotional response, I will try to represent that on an economical and neutral basis - not buying products by companies that I do not trust anymore and by spreading the word as well as my experiences. If this is one way we can reach the next level - than so it is. Thanks again for your time to share your insight with us and I hope we will eventually get somewhere.
#466
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:04
Darth Sagan wrote...
Currently spreading the thread through the extranet.
This platform has encountered some resistance with other units refusing to accept widely accepted concensus.
Rewrite heretics or destroy?
#467
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:04
HackNFly wrote...
To: atghunter Considering the people who will simply not buy from Bioware anymore, and the large number of people who certainly won't preorder any games from Bioware anymore. Who do you think has the greater advantage as far as time is concerned (us/Bioware). People might not hold the line anymore, but they're also probably not going to care about Bioware as well.
I am simply going to repost what I already said and have been saying:
I will add what I have been harping on for a while now: threatening to boycott a product or products not yet made doesn't necessarily mean much. These DLC or ME4 or others have not necessarily been produced yet so Bioware hasn't expended money on them yet. Threatening not to buy them won't cost Bioware profit since the logical marketing response is to simply not make them. Bioware will make something else, perhaps evaluating the situation and using focus groups and marketing studies (I have friends who've been doing this stuff for years) to see which new audience to seek out instead.
It might be useful to do other, visible things. A boycott of Goliath would have been nice, but it's much too divisive
and dividing this movement is not a viable option. One person suggested changing your online avatar's name to reflect the movement, maybe adding "Hold The Line" or "Retake ME." This sounds like a reasonable
alternative, since it will show numbers. Not ideal, though, since you're still using the faulty product although it might send the message that while you enjoy the game and therefore will pay to get it "fixed" you are still displeased (there's no getting around paying). Like I said, it'll be a show of numbers.
Thatbeing said, I defer to atghunter's superior knowledge of PR and I believe him when he says that the new tactics of "review bombing" and keeping up negative press online is achieving wonders.
Modifié par redknight38, 17 mars 2012 - 04:05 .
#468
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:04
#469
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:06
Holding the Line.
#470
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:07
Darth Malignus wrote...
Darth Sagan wrote...
Currently spreading the thread through the extranet.
This platform has encountered some resistance with other units refusing to accept widely accepted concensus.
Rewrite heretics or destroy?
Destroy. The heretics may have back-up programs that will cause them to revert to their heretical nature. To ensure the security and cohesion of our unit, we must prevent them from infiltrating our ranks, particularly under a banner of false peace.
#471
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:07
#472
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:08
#473
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:08
#474
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:08
That aside, Bioware showed us last weekend no one's around during the weekend. This is a perfect time to make a move so we have a two day head start. Keep spreading the word!
Modifié par Dreogan, 17 mars 2012 - 04:16 .
#475
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 04:09
DeeBeeP wrote...
When was the last time you saw a thread get locked that wasn't because it was a copy of a current thread? It's been days since I've seen anything be locked for any other reason. You think the mods are treating the forums like they're walking on glass, as if locking any thread will just encite another riot?
I've seen several locked becuase "They aren't ME3 campaign related". This one they may not touch because of backlash, but at the end of the day it is THEIR foum and if they want to lock it...




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




