mattynutz wrote...
what he said social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/10084349/324#10380552
Ukjack44 wrote...
GizmoKodiak wrote...
RiGoRmOrTiS_UK wrote...
FreakyProphet wrote...
RiGoRmOrTiS_UK wrote...
Jessicacs post is fine and I appreciate the time she spent to reply. But i'd love to know why she doesn't agree with the end goal of "retake mass effect" beyond supporting her fellow colleagues. How can changing it not be a good tying considering the obvious huge plotholes at the end.
Simply put, it's not her job. She's neither QA nor a writer, she is community manager. Her job is to find out what WE think, and deliver that information to her employers, not to tell everyone what her personal opinion about any aspect of the game is.
But she just gave her personal opinion of not agreeing with the movement. Would be nice to know her opinion of why the endings are ok the way they are...
She did say that in the future perhaps she can discuss with us her own opinions on the endings.
Yet she openly disagrees with the Retake Mass Effect movement without providing a reason why. Then moans to us about saying we disagree with the ending and not saying why (even though we do). Hypocrite much?
C'mon man, do you see anything in this thread after her post that indicates any of us have forgotten everything?Nefelius wrote...
That's not what i meant and i do not inspire hostility towards Jessica or any other representative.Harbing3r wrote...
Nefelius wrote...
Sorry but i don't buy all this.
What i see now - people are getting distracted from the REAL issue, and start praising Jessica just for being paid attention to.
That's more that suspicious, sorry.
The REAL issue is that we all want a better, clearer ending for Mass Effect 3 and we're not going away until we do.... But there's no reason to be hostile, rude, unpleasant etc while we wait.
What i meant that now community is relieved - of course because there's a whole big "sedative" post. "They do listen! Everything will be alright! Thank you!10000 times thank you!" But everyone forgets that the issue is still there.
It's like dispersing an angry mob with cold, but sweetened water.
Psythorn wrote...
@Jessica
The forum is buzzing and threads are rolling fast so I've little hope, that you might find the time. But maybe you could shed some light on "numbers" beeing a PR person maybe you have more acurate knowledge.
I once read that behind every dissatisfied customer that speaks up there are about 2 who don't - on the other hand behind every satisfied customer that posts/calls etc. there are 10 who don't. Is this valid ?
In this case if looking at the mother of all ending polls (http://social.biowar...m/633606/polls/) on BW Network this would translate to:
Dislike: 58.000 people (use x3) = 174.000 people do not like it
Somewhat like it: 3800 people would like it if small changes would be applied (use x11) = 41.800 people
Like it: 1300 people (use x11) ) = 14.300 people like it
The missing 4 millions we do not know...
So 174.000 people do not like it whereas 56.100 like it to some extend. Thats about 3:1.
So I really can't understand how some people pretend that the end is pleasing a majority.
Yes the poll started out somewhat too "simple" but I think along with clearification in the first post it comes down to "like it", "somewhat like it" and "don't like it" - this set aside - are the assumptions valid ?
What is your take on this (please take my apologies if you already posted something somewhere about this in this fast rolling threads).
mattynutz wrote...
Awesome stuffJessica Merizan wrote...
Blah Blah, don't pick things apart
atghunter wrote...
1) First, I will nether label you in a derogatory fashion nor denigrate your opinion Sir, you're entitled to your perspective just as everyone else is here. My speculations are from my own experiences, just you have claimed your opinions originate from yours. If you think I'm wrong, that's your prerogative. Let’s agree to disagree. I promise you I'm old enough and strong enough to accept an opinion I don't agree with.
2) As for my comments being a “straight up insurgency strategy”, you give me credit for being far more clever than I am and not giving the people here credit for being as smart as they are. Even as far back as my first post, I explained much of this is new and quite intriguing to me having an older PR perspective.
3) If you've worked your way through this thread (which I readily acknowledge is vast), you will see that most people (myself included) are committed to a civil discourse and that there is a clear distinction in discussions between a corporation that people vastly feel did not provide them with a quality product and the hard-working people in that company.
5) Moreover, I think you'd be surprised to find we have people here in this thread who liked the endings and not only engage in discussions, but are encouraged to use their voice no matter what side they are on. To say that you believe Bioware/EA is doing everything right is your opinion, but I hope you can civilly accept some people here think that view is simply wrong.
6) You ultimately make the point that Bioware is full of human beings. I would ask you to consider the other side of that coin. The customer base is full of human beings too. With an understanding of both sides of that coin, folks can remain civil and still argue their sides.
7) As you have paid me the courtesy of your constructive criticism, I hope you'll allow me two in return. Entering a discussion with a defensive tone often makes the other side wonder why you started the discourse in the first place. Second, if you really desire have a civil discourse, you probably shouldn't open that dialogue by calling the other person "dude". I assure you Sir, I'm far too old for that moniker.
maglor07, Leesard, Dalis918 (snip snip snip)
mumwaldee369 wrote...
Psythorn wrote...
@Jessica
The forum is buzzing and threads are rolling fast so I've little hope, that you might find the time. But maybe you could shed some light on "numbers" beeing a PR person maybe you have more acurate knowledge.
I once read that behind every dissatisfied customer that speaks up there are about 2 who don't - on the other hand behind every satisfied customer that posts/calls etc. there are 10 who don't. Is this valid ?
In this case if looking at the mother of all ending polls (http://social.biowar...m/633606/polls/) on BW Network this would translate to:
Dislike: 58.000 people (use x3) = 174.000 people do not like it
Somewhat like it: 3800 people would like it if small changes would be applied (use x11) = 41.800 people
Like it: 1300 people (use x11) ) = 14.300 people like it
The missing 4 millions we do not know...
So 174.000 people do not like it whereas 56.100 like it to some extend. Thats about 3:1.
So I really can't understand how some people pretend that the end is pleasing a majority.
Yes the poll started out somewhat too "simple" but I think along with clearification in the first post it comes down to "like it", "somewhat like it" and "don't like it" - this set aside - are the assumptions valid ?
What is your take on this (please take my apologies if you already posted something somewhere about this in this fast rolling threads).
adam six sigma says it's closer to 25 customers that don't speak up.
http://www.adamssixs...ers_results.htm
Dissatisfied customers are an interesting group.
For every one that complains there are at least 25 who do not.
Dissatisfied customers by word of mouth will tell eight to sixteen others
about their dissatisfaction. With the web some are now telling thousands.
91% of dissatisfied customers never purchase goods or services from the
company again. A prompt effort to resolve a dissatisfied customer's issue will result in about 85% of them as repeat customers
Depending upon the business, new customer sales may cost 4 to 100 times
that of a sale to an existing customer.
Modifié par Psythorn, 21 mars 2012 - 01:29 .
Modifié par Sarah Aran, 21 mars 2012 - 01:31 .
It's amazing to me that an exchange on Twitter could lead to the analysis of a possible new dimension in an accepted sociology metric. It's a bit recursive that this new dimension is probably what let this exchange and analysis happen in the first place.Jessica Merizan wrote...
PS I'm glad to hear so many people who are moving from the 90 to the 9. Will check BSN registrations and our Facebook PTAT
Nite 4 realzzz
mumwaldee369 wrote...
Psythorn wrote...
@Jessica
The forum is buzzing and threads are rolling fast so I've little hope, that you might find the time. But maybe you could shed some light on "numbers" beeing a PR person maybe you have more acurate knowledge.
I once read that behind every dissatisfied customer that speaks up there are about 2 who don't - on the other hand behind every satisfied customer that posts/calls etc. there are 10 who don't. Is this valid ?
In this case if looking at the mother of all ending polls (http://social.biowar...m/633606/polls/) on BW Network this would translate to:
Dislike: 58.000 people (use x3) = 174.000 people do not like it
Somewhat like it: 3800 people would like it if small changes would be applied (use x11) = 41.800 people
Like it: 1300 people (use x11) ) = 14.300 people like it
The missing 4 millions we do not know...
So 174.000 people do not like it whereas 56.100 like it to some extend. Thats about 3:1.
So I really can't understand how some people pretend that the end is pleasing a majority.
Yes the poll started out somewhat too "simple" but I think along with clearification in the first post it comes down to "like it", "somewhat like it" and "don't like it" - this set aside - are the assumptions valid ?
What is your take on this (please take my apologies if you already posted something somewhere about this in this fast rolling threads).
adam six sigma says it's closer to 25 customers that don't speak up.
http://www.adamssixs...ers_results.htm
Dissatisfied customers are an interesting group.
For every one that complains there are at least 25 who do not.
Dissatisfied customers by word of mouth will tell eight to sixteen others
about their dissatisfaction. With the web some are now telling thousands.
91% of dissatisfied customers never purchase goods or services from the
company again. A prompt effort to resolve a dissatisfied customer's issue will result in about 85% of them as repeat customers
Depending upon the business, new customer sales may cost 4 to 100 times
that of a sale to an existing customer.
Modokun wrote...
That is absolutely fantastic, but if 25 people liked it for every 1 that didnt and was vocal about it, there would be more people that like it than who have actually played the game.
Nurane wrote...
Modokun wrote...
That is absolutely fantastic, but if 25 people liked it for every 1 that didnt and was vocal about it, there would be more people that like it than who have actually played the game.
I think he meant that there are 25 who were also dissatisfied but didn't speak up.
sorry if I stuck in the clarification and it wasn't needed.
magica87 wrote...
I missed some pages of post, I'm sorry...it seems that numbers are giving us right...thankfully!
so...some significant news from bioware?
mattynutz wrote...
maglor07, Leesard, Dalis918 (snip snip snip)
Thanks for your approval, guys. I don't want to come off as a D-bag, but I don't think it's fair to have to withhold criticism for fear of hurt feelings.
mattynutz wrote...
maglor07, Leesard, Dalis918 (snip snip snip)
Thanks for your approval, guys. I don't want to come off as a D-bag, but I don't think it's fair to have to withhold criticism for fear of hurt feelings.
jarrettwold wrote...
My God, I feel like I'm living the 4chan equivalent of Plato's Republic and you're Thrasymachus.