So basically, pay us 10 bucks if you want to reduce the ending from 100% fail to 90% fail.
Doesn't it really bother anyone how that bit of backstory got shoehorned in at the last possible moment? When you look at Drew Karpyshyn and how he claims that the current ME3 ending is pretty much what he first envisioned you just have to wonder: if that's the case then why did the lore not build around solidifying this earlier? I mean, give us Javik in ME1 and have him tell us ****. Or in early ME2. Or at any time.
Like, then players can warm up to the whole idea that synthetics kill organics and bla bla...
Actually you know what, nevermind.
As a philosophy student I just hate it when people with no philosophical basis try to engage in it and act profound. It's fine if you have an interest in philosophy, but don't try to base an entire sci-fi trilogy on some philosophical assertion you've made that has absolutely no basis. When Spacekid spoke I got the feeling I was literally listening to the writer himself, and what he thought up on some random afternoon about the future of artificial intelligence. Total immersion killer.
It turns out the ME Trilogy is just a poor man's commentary on the implications of sentient artificial life. Thanks for trying, but no thanks. Terminator literally did this better.
Terminator.
Modifié par Eain, 17 mars 2012 - 12:31 .
Retour en haut
