688 réponses à ce sujet

[xrudix]

7/10.
Because of:
1. no proper intro.
2. from mediocre to terribad graphics. I can't remember even one level that i really liked.
3. terrible animations.
4. terrible controls - space osum button.
5. mission log or better to say there is no one.
6. import not working correctly.
7. lots of glitches/bugs/issues.
8. character syncing in conversations very bad.
9. really dumb sidequests ala fly into that system and bring me one thing, or n7 wave of enemies - couldnt it be some puzzle or something else. I really liked ship crash in me2.
10. mission markers - some of them were not updated on the map.
11. loot - some items almost impossible to find, ie dog tags.
12. no mini games.
13. scanning look worse imho.

Modifié par xrudix, 21 mars 2012 - 04:22 .

[Foreste]

9/10
Good things can get even better.

[clarkusdarkus]

7/10 and thats because the journal and mission structure was a joke, there was no interaction with ur squadmates and they became * hey shep*, 1 hub being the citadel? hell even mass effect one with its mako missions gave more then the walk past a random guy on citadel and pick this up by scanning....lets be honest there was hardly any missions at all really, few n7 side missions were just wave missions, the game froze a few times, dialogue wheel was auto most of the time. so personally i was hoping to visit more planets and do alot more stuff but wasnt to be other than priority missions. enjoyed the geth/turian moments, liked the combat and scale. weapons were cool and using the armor from dragon age and kindom of alamur was also a nice touch. all in all wasnt that great a game and thats before the ending!!!

[Aensland75]

9/10
There are still some glitches with speech and animation. And the lack of journal updates as opposed to ME 2.
I have faith that this will be solved in future patches, DLCs.
The gameplay is the best atm, just imagine ME 1 and ME 2 with the gameplay from ME 3! I would almost drop every other game out there to keep playing the trilogy in succesion. It shows how well it evolved.

The ending 3/10, it might sound good but it's hollow and it hurts every player that loves his/her Shepard.

[The Demon Assassin]

9/10
The Citadel fetch and grab quests were just stupid.

[Kris_Rebel]

With the ending - 10/10

[SomeoneStoleMyName]

xrudix wrote...

7/10.
Because of:
1. no proper intro.
2. from mediocre to terribad graphics. I can't remember even one level that i really liked.
3. terrible animations.
4. terrible controls - space osum button.
5. mission log or better to say there is no one.
6. import not working correctly.
7. lots of glitches/bugs/issues.
8. character syncing in conversations very bad.

So you are complaining that an RPG game is lackluster because of lack of... graphics? LOL!

Gotta disagree with you on most points.

1: The intro is the entire scene in the start untill the ME3 logo comes up.Id call that a solid intro.
2: Bad graphics? The graphics were amazing. I guess if you found a diamond youd be complaining it didnt glow in the dark aswell
3: The animations werent fantastic, but not bad either. Average. Shouldnt affect score much but agree with you to some extent.
4: I never had problems with the controls, but thats playing on PC. 
5: Mission log is lacking abit, agreed. Still I dont think its fair to judge a game by such trivial small stuff.
6: Worked for me. Should work for most people. This shouldnt be relevant to the score.
7: Played through entire ME3 without a single bug. 
8: Didnt notice this myself.

[Nenomitrosis]

9.5

[Heenett]

10/10, with no doubt.

[Can0fCorn]

You can't rate a game without its ending. It's like asking, "rate what smoking a cigarette is like, minus the health risks."

[Thatguyky]

Without the ending - solid 10/10 baby!

With the ending 4/10

[Kharizma]

9.5/10. The need for multi-player to get EMS high enough for certain endings is annoying, but the story line up until the ending was everything I hoped it would be and then some, making the small bugs/glitches insignificant.

[Litefire]

before the citadel 10/10. After the ending 7/10,

[ztonkin]

10/10

Ending: 4/10...and 3 of those points are for the Faunts

[xrudix]

SomeoneStoleMyName wrote...

xrudix wrote...
snip

snip

Please read response
1. you always start on earth, even if you played cerberus, so for me no intro. Everybody says to me that I not working with cerberus even shep says that for me it is WTF. Hell even if you destroyed collector base you still dont know why you start on earth. For me it would be better if game started from hacket calls me and I go to mars.
2. have you played batman, deus ex or the witcher? when playing game, especially rpg I want to feel the world and atmosphere. The graphics and soundtrack allows you to feel that better and in mass effect it was bad for 2012. For me palawen was hit in the heart, general textures awful, a turian that always shootting at dead husk, really? Cant they came to better solution. In witcher you have a world that always changing and there are a lot of random generated events. Not to mention water animation, sprite husks, unreal trees.
3. ehm, not sure if you serious. browse youtube and you find some gotta go animations, or in conversations char head was turned into really strange position.
4. Space awesome button really? dont believe, but maybe you played vanguard.
5. Journal is one of most important things in rpgs.
6. For me it matters.
7. I had a dozen of them especially with ladders.

Modifié par xrudix, 21 mars 2012 - 04:49 .

[cmike_20]

game 10/10, ending -1/10 knowing now that they didn't care i would have preferred to see the ending of a family guy episode after Lois kills Stewie pop up on the screen after i picked which unicorn to ride off in the sunset with...

[gosimmons]

The ending aside?

Main game ranges from 8.5 to 9.5

[txalikat]

10/10 up until charging the beam. Sure, there were a few glitches (Don't look at me Liara and I won't look at you! LOL) but they weren't bad enough to ruin my enjoyment of the game.

The ending itself? 4/10 I suppose. And I am only that gracious because my femShep apparently lives. There are too many inconsistancies/plot holes/weirdness to give it anything higher.

[UrgentArchengel]

Definiately a solide 10/10. It to me was perfect, then it came to the ending.

[Melancholic]

9.7/10

Loses points for the the fetch quests and... no, mostly just the fetch quests.

That isn't to say I don't have other complaints, but none of them are big enough to impact my enjoyment at all.

[JohnnyG]

Without the ending, 9/10. They need to get rid of the ME requirement to get a high enough EMS. And there are a few minor issues that should also be hammered out. With the ending? I can't even go that low because the ending ruined not just this game, but the first two for me as well.

[Captain Arty]

Until you head to Cerberus HQ, I'd have given it a 10. It had some issues before that, but nothing I'd deduct points for.

The last couple hours continue to go downhill. Before launching the final assault, I'd have given it a 9-9.5. After seeing the endings, I have to give it like a 7.

[PureLeadHead]

Without the ending? 10/10!

[greatgeek]

7/10
- autodialogue
-face import bug

Modifié par greatgeek, 21 mars 2012 - 04:52 .

[clipped_wolf]

8/10. Fantastic game with horrible run/cover/GD roll all in one button. Plus plot holes you can fly a stealthed frigate through.