majormajormmajor wrote...
Yet, conversely, you have articles like the one Colin Moriarty at IGN or Ben Kuchera at PA Report have done, essentially attacking people who hate the ending and questioning them personally. Instead of trying to defend the ending on its own merits, they resort to basically insults, calling people entitled whiners who don't understand real sci-fi and just want happy endings with ice cream and cake.
NO, They don't know what real Sci-fi is. Joe Haldeman and Heinlien are REAL Sci-Fi, as well as Bradbury and Orson Scott Card.
Do you know why? Because they combined their stories with a combination of futuritistic predictions, moral themes and warnings about the future, political opinions, examination of what could go wrong and how bleak things can be, BUT THEY ALMOST ALWAYS HAVE A COHERENT AND HOPEFUL ENDING THAT PROVIDES CLOSURE, if not there is ALWAYS a silver lining. Why? Because they are responsible with the work they produce.
Some of the greatest Sci-fi stories ever written follow this formula. Let's take a look at these for a moment....
The Forever War
Starship Troopers
Fahrenheit 451
STAR WARS
Ender's Game series
Dune
Halo
The list goes on and on....
Mass Effect is REAL Sci-Fi because it incorporates all of these into all three games execpt in the ending because there is no cohrence, hope, and closure. It is abdunently clear the creators got sloppy.
The fanbase understands real sci-fi, that's part of the reason they love this series so much!
We are upset because of how disrespectful the ending was in respect to the entire series, themes, and precedents it set. Not because we 'don't understand real sci-fi'.
I'm sure the fanbase knows more about real sci-fi than any of these inconsiderate attackers who place these false acusations upon us.
I personally find this very insulting that someone would EVEN dare to place a judgement upon me and TRY TO TELL ME how I think, place words and thoughts into my mouth and mindI will not stand for this.