Wow. Taking it a bit too far?
#76
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 08:46
#77
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 08:47
#78
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 08:48
#79
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 08:48
Lozark wrote...
Calm down~ This kind of doomsaying is way out there and totally unnessecary. This was a report filed to the FTC, the place where consumers go to report their complaints, not a one man march on Bioware HQ or a suicide threat. It is not legal action, and it is not going to start anything like what you've said.
The FTC complaint is merely an indicator - as is the fact we know how unprecedented the backlash is - that folks are prepared to 'over-react' in a response to the ending controversy. Bioware knew the ending would be controversial since they made it but I don't think they quite anticipated just how extreme a response there would be.
Lozark wrote...
This kind of hyperbolic rhetoric is exactly what the articles against us use and want from us, so that they can in turn spin it all out of proportion and make us look bad. These are the "news" out;lets that have tried to make our movement look selfish because of our donations to charity.
Human nature is, by it's very nature unpredictable. Let's face it, there are instances every few years of folks killing themselves over their team being beaten in the World Cup - I suppose there are things that folks have a much greater emotional connection to than people realise. I'm not saying any of this would happen - but that we have to consider just how unknown the territory this game's ending has us stepping into is.
A random post on BSN has little weight. Then again, there are more and more aggressive tactics being used by some of the games media itself to both support and chastise the fans for wanting a better ending. Sooner or later, one of these 'experts' is going to make the same point - and that's when the media will pounce because they have a more reliable source that a lot of folks will immediately trust.
Lozark wrote...
The FTC isn't going to sue anyone over this, or take legal action against anyone. They're going to note that people have complaints and issues with a product made and sold to them by Bioware and EA and that's it. It helps get the word out a little more, and that's a good thing. The worst, the absolute worst, that could happen to Bioware or EA over this? They get a note from the FTC about how one of their products has gotten a large influx of complaints. And that only happens if a whole lot of people file with the FTC.
I agree. My posts were referring to the games-playing public at large, not this specific case. This specific case merely alerts us to the fact that there are those people out there who react much more aggressive and irrational to the relative few who visit these boards. It's also a 'spotlight' title - the controversy has actually made the news in a number of places and momentum is only just starting to build. This means the 'powers that be' in the media will be looking very closely for a way to use this sort of thing as another attack on video games, and if even a single person goes too far then that will be the first shot fired by the media.
#80
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 08:49
And lots of them are hurting the Retake ME cause by saying things like "The endings weren't that bad..."
Just leave it be IMO.
Modifié par Myrmedus, 17 mars 2012 - 08:51 .
#81
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 08:53
Militarized wrote...
IT. IS. NOT. LEGAL. ACTION. LEARN YOUR RIGHTS AS A CONSUMER.
I believe it to be a matter of tact, rather than extremities. I agree with Militarized, filing complaints with the FTC or the BBB are somewhat pointless unless done enmasse (which won't happen even with the endings as they are).
If you truly believe Mass Effect is a product between Developer and Consumer, you keep your issues between the two of you until the last possible outcome. We have yet to reach the last possible outcome.
Even so, purporting a subjective product like a video game, a book ,or a movie as being falsely advertised is a stretch, and will most likely be a waste of their and, more importantly, your time.
#82
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 08:55
Modifié par AlexXIV, 17 mars 2012 - 08:55 .
#83
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 08:56
Kosiji wrote...
http://www.gameinfor...to-the-ftc.aspx
Thoughts?
I was strongly against it because it sends the wrong symbolic associations.
#84
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 08:56
#85
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 08:57
Game Informer has lost a subscriber.
#86
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 08:58
#87
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 08:59
Modifié par Kosiji, 17 mars 2012 - 08:59 .
#88
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:00
#89
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:01
It isn't the path i would have taken, as the penalties to the company could be quite severe (in the off chance they decide they have a valid case), but hey, he made the call.
#90
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:04
#91
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:05
I hate how some people are like "These endings are terrible you must change them! But I love Bioware and Bioware is awesome, etc, etc." If you're going to be mad, dagnabbit, then be mad.
Modifié par RedMike512, 17 mars 2012 - 09:05 .
#92
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:05
Aedan276 wrote...
Kosiji wrote...
http://www.gameinfor...to-the-ftc.aspx
Thoughts?
I was strongly against it because it sends the wrong symbolic associations.
I agree with you on that.
#93
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:06
#94
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:07
However the false information came from interviews for the most part, so I don't think that counts as advertising exactly. So it's most likely a waste of time.
#95
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:08
#96
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:08
squee365 wrote...
A real life Illusive Man. hah.
No..no..no....Illusive Fan.
#97
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:09
And, if Bioware/EA doesn't do something in the next couple months, this guy might have started the ball rolling for a very legitimate investigation.
I hope that all works out and that the situation gets resolved without this, but if anything, he had a better idea than the people trying to boycott multiplayer.
#98
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:11
He's a consumer, that feels he wasn't given what was promised. Instead of just "hoping" they will do right by him, he's taking legal steps to make sure the conversation doesn't leave the table (or fade away). Trust me, BioWare and EA want this to happen.
While I personally would not do what he did, I don't see why people are calling the guy crazy. He's doing what any consumer should do if they legitimately feel they were lied to, or were a victim of false advertisement.
#99
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:11
#100
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 09:11





Retour en haut






