Dusty Everman wrote...
CptData wrote...
Since we're at it: afaik only few LIs are tagged as "true love". That's Liara, Ashley, Kaidan, Cortez and Traynor afaik. Not sure about Garrus and Tali.
What does that tag mean? Is there a "not-true-love-but-love" tag too? Was the "true-love" tag meant to be used at some point for extra content that later got cut?
Just wondering.
We internally called that flag "true love" to remind us that you can have only one of those set at a time, and once its set, there's no turning back. I believe that every LI in essence has one, including Jack, Miranda, etc.. The moment you declare your true love, all other active romances quietly turn to friendship. We didn't want to spend our dialog budgets on love triangles and break up conversations. It wouldn't have fit the theme of the game, and as is we have less romance dialog than we would have liked ( as many of you keep reminding us
) It's better to spend the budgets on the romances themselves.
Ahh okay. So that tag basically means it's your "final love interest".
Funny. I'd like to go deeper into that discussion, but I fear I would waste your precious time in that case.
I concur with the budget-thingy. Lets say - if there's a chance for a reboot of the series, I definitely like to see more stuff like that with the characters we like. The thing is - and I said it another thread - BW tried hard to create good characters we care about. They did a great job in ME1 and ME2 (although with mixed results for certain characters) but kinda stumbled over their own ideas in ME3. BW did an amazing job for Garrus, Vega and Liara, but the rest of the crew, including the VS, Tali and several ME2 characters, got a quite bad treatment.
What I don't get: why? Ashley & Kaidan are only available for the second half of the game - they already have fewer dialogue lines than the three characters I mentioned earlier. Why was it NOT possible to spend some resources for the VS in the second half of the game? I said it before: if you have the VS without an active romance on board, s/he's only an extra you easily can ignore like Diana Allers.
The ME2 romances got reduced to even less. Although I understand why Miranda, Jacob, Jack & Thane couldn't get bigger roles in ME2, it gives the feeling BW wasn't caring of them anymore - and it shows. No wonder the fans of those characters are upset, I can understand them.
As far as I can see, only one out of all romances feel -really- complete, and that's Liara's romance. I don't blame her for that - I'm just pointing at the rest of the romances which simply don't feel complete at all.
For a game that's mostly character-driven, this statement is quite devastating.
And yes, I know I'm biased as an Ashley fan. However, I know how ME2!LI-fans are feeling now, since their romances got a similar treatment like Ashley/Kaidan in ME2.
Also keep in mind a lot of players want more romance interaction / generic banter / more non-romantic interactions with certain characters. That stuff is THAT important players would pay for a DLC dealing with that - some are demanding a special mission where Shepard and the LI are doing a job together - including a lot of dialogue.
So maybe BW / EA should think about that one.
BW even did it before with LotSB - that DLC was dedicated to Liara - and it can be interpreted as "romance DLC" if you romanced Liara. For everyone else it was an incredible entertaining addition of hiqh quality maps to the vanilla game that was worth each penny.
Since no one is forced to buy a DLC, I can't see any issues with improving LIs with a DLC. If it's too complicated / too expensive to create a "one-for-all-DLC", split it up: one for the ME2!romances and one for the stock romances which got far less content than Liara's (means: Cortez, Allers (she's a fling, right?), Traynor, Williams, Kaidan, Tali and Garrus. Maybe add Vega here too, for fem!Shep exclusive.)
Modifié par CptData, 02 avril 2012 - 09:16 .