399 réponses à ce sujet

[Lozark]

No. I'd be ridiculously happy.

[Esoretal]

Nope.

[eddieoctane]

I'd be happy if I could pay for a new ending. I'd be ecstatic if I got it for free. I'm depressed and furious at the same time with what we have currently.

[aliengmr1]

no

[Sybafairy]

MonkeySeeker wrote...

While I want them to do SOMETHING about the endings, one thing that concerns me is that even if they do, no matter what they do they won't please everyone.

Even if they change/add to the ending there is no way everybody is getting the ending they personally want.

What happens then? Do people carry on demanding yet another ending? Or will people actually be able to accept that as long as it is a better ending, even if it's not what they themselves wanted, it's good enough?

This.

For the record i dont mind the endings at all. I would like a bit more clarification on some points maybe, but overall i dont have a huge issue.
I do feel for the people that do though.
But there is always going to be someone unhappy with it whatever they do. They cant concede to everyones wishes.

[eurohunk2]

if free no if payed then extremely yes

[mass_zotz]

I would run to my friends house and give him a hug if they did something about the endings.

Modifié par mass_zotz, 18 mars 2012 - 03:03 .

[Hashbeth]

To add my voice to a Chorus of many:
NO

[Lambchopz]

Can't tell if this question is serious.

All you have to do is read a few anti-ending threads and there's your answer.

[MonkeySeeker]

PrinceOfFallout13 wrote...

MonkeySeeker wrote...

While I want them to do SOMETHING about the endings, one thing that concerns me is that even if they do, no matter what they do they won't please everyone.

Even if they change/add to the ending there is no way everybody is getting the ending they personally want.

What happens then? Do people carry on demanding yet another ending? Or will people actually be able to accept that as long as it is a better ending, even if it's not what they themselves wanted, it's good enough?

any other ending is better than the one we got

I'd like to think so. I can't help but think that if/when a better ending comes some people still won't be happy if it isn't the exact better ending they were hoping for.

[Bantz]

I think if the plan all along was to have us deal with these crap endings and then put out a "truth" ending then i'd be annoyed that they sold me an unfinished game. But I'd be thrilled to have non suck endings and be able to play the game again.

[GiBBsBoT05]

Nope. If it was free I'd be ecstatic, if it was for $ I would hope it was a lengthy bit of DLC at least. Either way, I'd still be happy.

[Spectre Impersonator]

 No, I'd be thankful. 

[Liber320]

No, as long as it's free.

Either way, MY Sheperd was indoctrinated, fought against it and won by choosing the "destroy" option, and woke up in the rubble of London.
Now he just has to wait to be picked up by allies, get healed up, rejoin with his squadmates and proceed to kick Reaper ass, who are definately not the housecleaning pets of some StarGodChild, and are instead the galactic personification of inconprehensible fear that they have always been.

[Morladin]

no

[Unender]

My answer is no i would be overjoyed if they fixed the terrible ending

...but i'm curious to know why you think that Arrival re-wrote the ending to ME2... i mean, it didn't even touch it. it can take place either before or after the collector base and only one thing changes in the arrival story if it's done after, and that's if harbinger shows up as a reaper or as a collector... i mean, the ending to ME2 is exactly the same regardless...i'm confused, why do you think it re-wrote the ending to ME2? -scratches head-

[hammerfan]

um...no.

[Wowlock]

Personally, I take any theory other than this ending...as long as I can choose to do so and not some ''enforced'' crappy ending.

[BWGungan]

MonkeySeeker wrote...

PrinceOfFallout13 wrote...

MonkeySeeker wrote...

While I want them to do SOMETHING about the endings, one thing that concerns me is that even if they do, no matter what they do they won't please everyone.

Even if they change/add to the ending there is no way everybody is getting the ending they personally want.

What happens then? Do people carry on demanding yet another ending? Or will people actually be able to accept that as long as it is a better ending, even if it's not what they themselves wanted, it's good enough?

any other ending is better than the one we got

I'd like to think so. I can't help but think that if/when a better ending comes some people still won't be happy if it isn't the exact better ending they were hoping for.

There's reasonable and there's unreasonable. 

I think based on the size of the outcry right now due to the fact that the ending discards everything you did in the last five minutes, and the clear plot holes, and bad writing in an otherwise exceptionally written game, it's clear that as consumers who paid money for something, we have a right to request reparations. 

If it were a decent ending that showed some service to your choices from even just this last game, and didn't completely negate every choice you ever made before the last 5 minutes, it would probably be unreasonable for people who just plain didn't like it to demand a new ending.

Modifié par BWGungan, 18 mars 2012 - 03:14 .

[mCmuFFeL]

i thought that's what we fight for

well only if the new ending is even worse

[wolf465]

No

[avatar2396]

no, and I dont mind paying for it because it would take resources to do it. Nobody does anything for free.

[RedTail F22]

NO. and I never saw the Arrival DLC as a new ME2 ending. I saw it as a transition from ME2 to ME3. Nothing wrong with that.

btw... What else would we be holding the line for?!?

Modifié par RedTail F22, 18 mars 2012 - 03:16 .

[Jakemantiv8]

No

[zSeven]

No, I'd be willing to pay $10 for something that made sense.