399 réponses à ce sujet

[MakeMineMako]

No.

Because Bioware/EA will be making good on their advertised claims, and fixing a faulty product.

We did not get what we were actually paying for in the end.

[Rulycar]

I hope I don't have to eat these words ...
... they could not possibly write something worse that what currently exists.
So, in answer to your question ... No.

[Mushufasa1512]

Nope

[sizuka2]

If it's good? No, not outraged, even if they charged. I doubt it would restore my former trust in their talents, even if good, but it might well move them from 'avoid at all costs' to 'think before buying'.

[Frostay89]

No, I'd be pretty happy as long as it's a better ending than what we have.

[Ghost of a Messiah]

It can still be bleak if it has to be... But he deserve a good death... A warriors death.

[Kishala]

Anyone who has been hoping Bioware would do that would be ecstatic. We love the game, and I feel by now Bioware understands that to the nth degree. Changing the ending would be a victory for both us (the fans) and Bioware. A victory for us fans because it's what we want. A victory for Bioware because now most of the pissed off fans are happy. It's also a victory for Bioware because it does a few things. One (as long as the ending actually makes sense this time) should be an ending fitting the Mass Effect trilogy, Commander Shepard, and the Normandy squad. It also shows that Bioware is actually willing to listen and implement fan feedback. Very very few companies do that these days.

Some journalists have pointed out that if Bioware does "cave in", as they put it, then it sets a dangerous precedence for future games. They  completely disregard the fact that Bethesda did it in Fallout 3 and, even earlier than that, back in the days before television, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle did it with Sherlock Holmes after fans wrote to him.

I understand the point behind what Bioware tried to do with the ME3 ending (to a degree. Some things just totally confuse me as they just do fit.) The ending does have a wonderful message of hope. Yes Shepard died (unless you had enough EMS for the destroy ending to show you an N7 body taking a sudden breath,) but she (I play FemShep) died to save the galaxy. Yes the Normandy crashed landed on a fertile planet but they lived and eventually populated the planet, granted I'm sure Doctor Chakwas provided plenty of pain pills to Joker for the pelvis I'm sure he kept breaking. However, the current ending just doesn't fit. bioware tried to out do themselves with it and it just didn't work. It's a learning experience.

TLDR; Nope. I'd be happy and sho should everyone else.

[NamelessJT]

thehomeworld wrote...

As the title says wouldn't that make you upset if they did this? I read in an article two theories on endings BW could be pursuing one is called the truth it basically would be an ending were shep was indoctrinated and what we experienced with the star child and the decisions was actually a lie. But would this be a better or worse thing? 

 

If they decided to release a new ending(s), I would not be outraged.  While I am dissatisifed with what I was given, I am more dissatisified with how Bioware is handling the situation.

Without going into paragraphs of "why I didn't like the ending", I would just like closure to the Mass Effect series to be more in line with something Bioware made... not Square ENIX.  if I wanted to play a JRPG, I would play a JRPG. 

I didn't want to play a JRPG.

I wanted to play the last part of a trilogy to a Science Fiction RPG (or Cover-Based Shooter RPG, depending on what crowd you want to speak to) that did its best to explain how the galaxy worked and did not rely on "mysterious energy", "crystals", "espers", "magicite", or "the power of the heart".

If I cannot be provided a proper ending by Bioware, then I would be just as satisifed with an honest statement as to why and an apology for speaking to me as a child, instead of as a customer.  I would like enjoy the promise of the studio's leadership that they will do better next time and continue to be a company that is known for quality... not quantity.\\

Fixing a lapse in poor writing and game design or providing me a professional and honest answer is acceptable to me.  I would not be outraged and would continue to pay money for their products and continue to speak highly of them to my friends, families, and internet associates. 

They did a good thing with Mass Effect and it is a pity that, despite all their success and glory ... Mass Effect will always be associated with, "It was great, but..."

EDIT:  Spelling and removal of poor editing!

Modifié par NamelessJT, 18 mars 2012 - 08:27 .

[greywardencommander]

Arrival wasn't 'rewriting the ME2 ending' it was 'the bridge' between ME2 and ME3.
and NO because if they did it would not negate my previous 120+ hours and give me my 'actual ending with closure' they promised. It would also not have technically been against their 'various different endings claim. It would mean replaying ME1-3 in different ways is actually worthwhile.
I would be equally satisfied with a - we did this ending because, these plot holes such as Normandy are explained by x y z.

Modifié par greywardencommander, 21 mars 2012 - 09:39 .

[shurryy]

O F C O U R S E!
Not.

[Gruumi]

Since I think that the ending is an indoctrination attempt, I don't want to get a "new ending" that fixes the current one. I just want new content that follows that part and which is not necessarily a new ending altogether.

[Kanner]

Depends entirely on the ending they release.

Their team had two years to come up with this one. Pushed to assemble something in say two months, there's no actual reason that it couldn't be EVEN WORSE than the current one.

Although that would be strangely impressive, in it's own way. Just not good.

[meteng]

Nope, not at all. I wouldn't even be annoyed if I had to pay for ending DLC.

[EmperorZorn]

No.
I would even pay for an improved ending.

[Haiyato]

no

[tenojitsu]

I'd pay $10 just for the chance to tell the star kid off

[dakka dakka]

Nope, be happy to see the truth within the lies :-P

[thebigbad1013]

(entering Sten mode)

No!

[greywardencommander]

Aesthyr wrote...

Since I think that the ending is an indoctrination attempt, I don't want to get a "new ending" that fixes the current one. I just want new content that follows that part and which is not necessarily a new ending altogether.

http://social.biowar.../index/10350970 

[Hexxys]

I'd only be pissed if they botched it again.

[Mad-Hamlet]

No this time around,
No the last time this question was asked,
and, just because I know people will ask again being too lazy to use a search function, no for the next time this thread is regurgitated.

[Ermacomat]

yeah... no probably not.

[Joccaren]

No, I'd be satisfied. Hopefully.
I would like some content to the ending - remake the entire last section well, and make it like a full sized DLC - but I would not be outraged if they released it. It is what I have been pushing for.

I would be outraged if fans gave them full credit for the indoc theory if they used it - as fans came up with that, not Bioware, and they should not be kissing Bioware's feet after they stole their work, but I will be content if the ending is improved.

[Rohirrim]

No. If they run with the indoctrination hypothesis, it would be the most memorable ending in video game history. One that has been carefully observed by players all over the globe. One that fixes the multiple plot holes of the current "ending". One that would let me forget all my disappointment and start playing Mass Effect 1 again. One I would gladly pay for. Do it, Bioware, please!

[Squallff8350]

Only way id be mad is if they somehow screwed it up again.