Yes and no.
Yes, because it sets a precedent that will make me weary of ALL future games.
No, because ME3's ending is the BATTLEFIELD EARTH of game endings, and it needs to be rectified.
However, if they planned this all along and offer FREE DLC, then cool beans.
So if they did release a new ending, wouldn't you be outraged?
Débuté par
thehomeworld
, mars 17 2012 11:31
Retour en haut
#28
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 11:34
goose2989
-
- Members
- 1 888 messages
No. I want my rainbows and butterflies ending with Tali
#30
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 11:34
Reptilian Rob
-
- Members
- 5 964 messages
No, I would fall to my knees and weep.
#32
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 11:35
MaraGriffyn
-
- Members
- 156 messages
No - releasing a new ending/alternate ending of some kind is exactly what they *should* do - ideally, it will be free, as a gesture of goodwill, though I'm not really holding my breath for that. It would show a willingness to fix a huge mistake like this, and a responsiveness to their fanbase which is important in maintaining customer loyalty.
Modifié par MaraGriffyn, 17 mars 2012 - 11:35 .
#33
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 11:35
SamFlagg
-
- Members
- 688 messages
No.
I think people were mad with the arrival that there wasn't a chance to get the batarians to flee their planet before blowing the system all to hell.
I think people were mad with the arrival that there wasn't a chance to get the batarians to flee their planet before blowing the system all to hell.
#35
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 11:35
darthnick427
-
- Members
- 3 785 messages
No I wouldn't be outraged. Anything is better than Starchild....ANYTHING..
#37
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 11:35
stcalvin13
-
- Members
- 301 messages
No.
I might be upset if they made me pay for it, but I'd get over it. Quickly.
I might be upset if they made me pay for it, but I'd get over it. Quickly.
#38
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 11:35
Chugster
-
- Members
- 1 776 messages
nope...i want a happy ending with lots of little blue children....at least for my main shep
#42
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 11:36
Soaringeagle78
-
- Members
- 393 messages
Yes.
Oops, I accidentally hit the 'yes' key on my computer. I meant no.
Oops, I accidentally hit the 'yes' key on my computer. I meant no.
#44
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 11:36
ConradsLaces
-
- Members
- 471 messages
No.
It would show that they're open to the idea of admitting to/fixing the problems, so that they're fans and customers are happy.
Bethesda did it... why can't Bioware?
It would show that they're open to the idea of admitting to/fixing the problems, so that they're fans and customers are happy.
Bethesda did it... why can't Bioware?
#46
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 11:37
dreaming_raithe
-
- Members
- 425 messages
If they decide to charge for it, I'm likely to be really angry. If it's something they actually planned all along, I'm also likely to be really angry, as that's just a poor way to treat your fans.
Otherwise, if they release even just a minor patch (even just a silly epilogue screen explaining how the other races manage to continue living on despite the fleet being trapped in Sol and the Relays being destroyed), I'll probably be happy.
Otherwise, if they release even just a minor patch (even just a silly epilogue screen explaining how the other races manage to continue living on despite the fleet being trapped in Sol and the Relays being destroyed), I'll probably be happy.
#47
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 11:37
Greed1914
-
- Members
- 2 638 messages
Seeing as how I've been asking for them to do just that, I'm going to say, "No."
I don't really see the point of the question.
I don't really see the point of the question.
#48
Posté 17 mars 2012 - 11:37
Swisspease
-
- Members
- 632 messages
As long as they did a good job and not mess it up like the one they gave us, then no
