Romeo Longsword wrote...
MerinTB wrote...
fourthrocker wrote...
I owned and played more games by the time I was 35 than you will in your whole life, and that was 23 years ago.
fourthrocker, can I ask you an absolutely serious question? It is not intended as an attack or a dig, honest.
If I told you I was 65, and that I had played more games than you had when you were 35 before you were even born -
would that make you accept my opinions as superior to yours?
Would it honestly give my argument any weight to you, and make you reconsider your view, simply based on my age and the number of games I played? Would you even take that as an "argument from authority" let alone allow a logical fallacy to alter your views?
While we are on that - if I told you that I was a multi-millionaire, and I never drive a care that is more than a year old, would that non-sequiter matter at all to your opinion on DAO?
Honestly?
If I was to answer for him, no, none of thouse things matters at all, but we could try to read between the lines and try to help him to understand the meaning of RPGs. And its not the rocket.
But your comment is attacking.
That may be how you are interpreting it, but it was never my intention.
The checkers thing? That was mocking calling Resident Evil an RPG.
This was asking him to put the shoe on the other foot, to think for himself if some of his arguments (his age, his gaming experience, his income) would work on him if an older, more-experienced with games, wealthier person argued the opposite of him. I don't think he'd care about any of those statistics - as they are all irrelevant.
Also, they are all logical fallacies and weaken, not strengthen, his argument.
If he has a point to make, bringing up the price of tea in China or an accusation that someone arguing against him is really an EA employee (no, he's said neither, they are broad examples of irrelevant points) distracts from any real points he'd have to make.
If you call it attacking when someone points out the logical flaws in your arguments, as opposed to someone trying to say he's superior and that others are just wrong (and calling them children unable to be spoken to intelligently) -
then you perhaps should reconsider what it means to attack someone.