I just want everyone to absorb the title of the thread... and realize how insanely retarded that is.
That's the ending in a nutshell dipped in dog ****.
Please don't praise this premise of a story.
Create synthetics to kill organics to make sure synthetics don't kill organics.
Débuté par
MrGPhantome
, mars 18 2012 10:26
Retour en haut
#3
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:27
TsaiMeLemoni
-
- Members
- 2 594 messages
I think there's a 'yodawg.jpg' floating around these forums with that same message.
#4
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:31
Wintermaulz
-
- Members
- 569 messages
Yo dawg, so we heard you dont wanna get killed by synthetics. So we created synthetics to kill organics to prevent organics from creating synthetics to kill more organics.
Nuf said
Nuf said
#5
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:33
Eterna
-
- Members
- 7 417 messages
Close but not quite. Create synthetics to kill organics in order to preserve life.
#6
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:34
dannati
-
- Members
- 156 messages
It's: "Yo dawg, I heard you don't like being killed by synthetics, so I created synthetics to kill you every 50k years so you won't be killed by synthetics."
#7
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:34
nullobject
-
- Members
- 385 messages
...otherwise known as the Xzibit Xtrategy.
#9
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:36
MrGPhantome
-
- Members
- 65 messages
Eterna5 wrote...
Close but not quite. Create synthetics to kill organics in order to preserve life.
That's not what is presented in the narrative.
It's litteraly: Create synthetics to kill organics to make sure synthetics don't kill organics.
#10
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:36
Lozark
-
- Members
- 413 messages
Eterna5 wrote...
Close but not quite. Create synthetics to kill organics in order to preserve life.
Then why not, oh, kill synthetics to keep organics from being killed by synthetics? And then, if we really want to get in depth, explain to the organics to quit mucking around with synthetics instead of killing them wholesale?
That's not what happened though. Instead we made some synthetics to kill organics to keep those synthetics from killing organics.
Modifié par Lozark, 18 mars 2012 - 10:37 .
#11
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:37
Heathen Pride
-
- Members
- 199 messages
Seems legit. Whoever created the reapers were some really smart dudes.
#12
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:37
111987
-
- Members
- 3 758 messages
It should be "Create synthetics to harvest/kill space-faring organics to make sure other synthetics don't kill ALL organics."
There is a difference. It's still a horrific plan, but it's not as 'retarded' as you're suggesting.
There is a difference. It's still a horrific plan, but it's not as 'retarded' as you're suggesting.
#13
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:39
alek2702
-
- Members
- 97 messages
MrGPhantome wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
Close but not quite. Create synthetics to kill organics in order to preserve life.
That's not what is presented in the narrative.
It's litteraly: Create synthetics to kill organics to make sure synthetics don't kill organics.
Actually it's: Create synthetic-organic hybrids to harvest/ascend advanced organics to make sure uncontrolled synthetics don't kill ALL organic life.
Somehow most of the whiners forget about these details....
Modifié par alek2702, 18 mars 2012 - 10:41 .
#14
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:39
EsterCloat
-
- Members
- 1 610 messages
No no. They're not killing organics. They're preserving organics.
By way of slurryfication. It's quite simple actually.
By way of slurryfication. It's quite simple actually.
#15
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:40
Eterna
-
- Members
- 7 417 messages
Lozark wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
Close but not quite. Create synthetics to kill organics in order to preserve life.
Then why not, oh, kill synthetics to keep organics from being killed by synthetics? And then, if we really want to get in depth, explain to the organics to quit mucking around with synthetics instead of killing them wholesale?
That's not what happened though. Instead we made some synthetics to kill organics to keep those synthetics from killing organics.
I assume it came to the point where organic life was on the verge of extinction and the lass races in the galaxies made the reapers as a last resort.
#16
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:40
TsaiMeLemoni
-
- Members
- 2 594 messages
Heathen Pride wrote...
Seems legit. Whoever created the reapers were some really smart dudes.
Ok that picture really almost made me fall out of my chair lol.
#17
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:40
SamFlagg
-
- Members
- 688 messages
Here's a question I actually have.
What hapens to the existing synthetics? I mean I would have to presume the reapers destroy all of them, otherwise the geth are 50,000 years ahead of the next curve.
What hapens to the existing synthetics? I mean I would have to presume the reapers destroy all of them, otherwise the geth are 50,000 years ahead of the next curve.
#18
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:43
Lozark
-
- Members
- 413 messages
Blending up all organic life and preserving the remains in a Reaper museum is not the same thing as saving organics.
#19
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:43
MrGPhantome
-
- Members
- 65 messages
alek2702 wrote...
Actually it's: Create synthetic-organic hybrids to harvest/ascend advanced organics to make sure uncontrolled synthetics don't kill ALL organic life.
Somehow most of the whiners forget about these details....
Some how Bioware apologist always turns to semantics to make their arguments seem better.
Modifié par MrGPhantome, 18 mars 2012 - 10:46 .
#20
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:43
111987
-
- Members
- 3 758 messages
Lozark wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
Close but not quite. Create synthetics to kill organics in order to preserve life.
Then why not, oh, kill synthetics to keep organics from being killed by synthetics? And then, if we really want to get in depth, explain to the organics to quit mucking around with synthetics instead of killing them wholesale?
Killing synthetics doesn't stop organics from creating more synthetics and AI. All it takes is for one sophisticated rogue AI to potentially endanger the galaxy. As seen by the Overlord situation, which had the potential to create a technological apocalypse. All it takes is one mistake.
You really think everyone is going to take kindly to the fact that a bunch of gigantic starships are telling people what to do? Nop; you're going to get people like TIM, who will try to destroy or control the Reapers, and create even more conflict.
#21
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:44
alek2702
-
- Members
- 97 messages
Lozark wrote...
Blending up all organic life and preserving the remains in a Reaper museum is not the same thing as saving organics.
They are saving the more primitive organics who would be wiped out by uncontrolled synthetics if the cycle didn't exist.
#22
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:45
111987
-
- Members
- 3 758 messages
Lozark wrote...
Blending up all organic life and preserving the remains in a Reaper museum is not the same thing as saving organics.
That's what the Reapers believe. No one is arguing that they're right, but that's not the point.
#23
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:45
Venturisection
-
- Members
- 155 messages
best ending explaination ever. +1
#24
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:46
SoraStrife
-
- Members
- 165 messages
alek2702 wrote...
MrGPhantome wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
Close but not quite. Create synthetics to kill organics in order to preserve life.
That's not what is presented in the narrative.
It's litteraly: Create synthetics to kill organics to make sure synthetics don't kill organics.
Actually it's: Create synthetic-organic hybrids to harvest/ascend advanced organics to make sure uncontrolled synthetics don't kill ALL organic life.
Somehow most of the whiners forget about these details....
Ive seen how Reapers are made. If that's not killing, I have no ****ing idea what is.
#25
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:46
Warden130
-
- Members
- 898 messages
The Reapers see it as preserving us. They don't care about saving individuals, only about saving the species as a whole. So they grind us up for our genetic material and make a new reaper to store us in so they can preserve us. Seems insane for us but that doesn't mean it doesn't make sense, atleast for the Reapers/Catalyst.
