Aller au contenu

Photo

California Literary Review gives ME3 2.5/5 stars, due to the ending


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
350 réponses à ce sujet

#1
TheKillerAngel

TheKillerAngel
  • Members
  • 3 608 messages
The California Literary Review is an online literary journal that focuses on arts and culture. I was checking the news on Mass Effect 3 this morning and thought it was interesting to see reviews from outside the gaming press.

http://calitreview.com/24673 

Without giving anything away, (directly, as all subsequent links will contain some spoilers) the ending, by which I mean the final five to ten minutes, of Mass Effect 3 is easily the worst finale I’ve seen compared to the preceding quality that came before it – in any medium. At literally every level, it’s objectively terrible.

Sloppy execution that reuses art assets reveals that it’s a hurried inclusion. The under thought and over pretentious dialogue does nothing but create bizarre, confusing plot holes. It even commits the same sin The Devil Inside did earlier this year, and has the gall to add an advertisement by the producers at the end of the credits, which is frankly insulting. 

Far more importantly though, it betrays key themes and values well established by the series thus far. Past player choice impacting the shape of events is negated in favor of an arbitrary and poorly explained “pick your favorite color” moment. Science fiction justification in an otherwise material world is abandoned for magical deism, since quite literally, a god in a machine appears. Unification through altruism and sacrifice is thrown out for pure nihilism: each of the choices you’re forced to make results in Shepard committing some level of genocide or another, with the benefits removed from any relatable emotional touchstone to the intangible space of far flung statistics. It even manages to make The Reapers, one of the more imposing forces of antagonism in recent memory, come across as foolish pawns.

For anyone with perspective, I know I’m belaboring a point – a bad ending can ruin all, from prose to play – but the sad fact is: no other professional review of Mass Effect 3 factored this ending into their universally positive ratings for the game, even though many acknowledged it as a problem. Not being one to claim conspiracy is to blame, I’d rather point to the more obvious culprit: ineptitude. A critic that can’t realize that narrative is often as important as gameplay – especially in an RPG – and that poorly constructed endings tarnish narrative quality – especially as it is the last thing the audience sees – is a poor critic indeed.

The gestalt of Mass Effect 3 is an end unjustified by its means, unworthy of defense. During its final moments it commits storytelling suicide, and the taste of decay it leaves in the mouth cripples the otherwise impeccable quality of what came before, poisoning even nostalgia against it. At best and being fair to the game’s other traits, the quality comes out a wash – simply mediocre.

Casey Hudson, the Director of the Mass Effect series, said in a recent interview that he wanted the endings to be “memorable.” I, for one, think he succeeded and I hope we all remember this game well.

Those who forget the history of bad ideas are doomed to repeat them.


Modifié par TheKillerAngel, 18 mars 2012 - 02:38 .


#2
joe1852

joe1852
  • Members
  • 481 messages
this hurts bioware a great deal

#3
QuarianHIV

QuarianHIV
  • Members
  • 459 messages
All we have to do now is wait for some BW drone like Eternal5 show up and call the review crap.

#4
dreaming_raithe

dreaming_raithe
  • Members
  • 425 messages
Yep, from a literary standpoint, it's absolutely atrocious. Glad to see others picking up on that. I think the disconnect with the themes of the rest of the games is really my biggest problem at this point.

#5
Kanon777

Kanon777
  • Members
  • 1 625 messages
This was clearly written by a biased hater, how i know this? Because i disagree with it.

#6
Roll Equals Cute

Roll Equals Cute
  • Members
  • 76 messages
Well written. Kudos for a great find!

#7
Asharad Hett

Asharad Hett
  • Members
  • 1 492 messages
HOLD THE LINE!

#8
Relwyn

Relwyn
  • Members
  • 325 messages

tobito113 wrote...

This was clearly written by a biased hater, how i know this? Because i disagree with it.


What an excellent and reasoned argument that is.:huh:

Modifié par Relwyn, 18 mars 2012 - 02:00 .


#9
dannii2

dannii2
  • Members
  • 108 messages
Ouch. All this is painful to watch and read. I really wish they would say something at this stage. I hate to think what is going to happen at this PAX thing.

x

Modifié par dannii2, 18 mars 2012 - 02:01 .


#10
AlienSpaceBats

AlienSpaceBats
  • Members
  • 1 819 messages
I totally agree with this article.

#11
Hobbs1975

Hobbs1975
  • Members
  • 12 messages
That's a great article.

#12
Mr. Big Pimpin

Mr. Big Pimpin
  • Members
  • 3 310 messages
Well said, California Literary Review.

#13
Samuel_Valkyrie

Samuel_Valkyrie
  • Members
  • 703 messages
Great find, indeed!

The longer this seems going, the more ammunition RetakeME3 seems to get, whereas Bioware/EA seems to end up more and more alone.

Which is sad, because I'm a player as well, and I love games, and I can see Bioware loves the games just as much as I do. It's just sad this is necessary.

#14
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 675 messages

TheKillerAngel wrote...

The California Literary Review is an online literary magazine that focuses on arts and culture. I was checking the news on Mass Effect 3 this morning and thought it was interesting to see reviews from outside the gaming press.

http://calitreview.com/24673 

Without giving anything away, (directly, as all subsequent links will contain some spoilers) the ending, by which I mean the final five to ten minutes, of Mass Effect 3 is easily the worst finale I’ve seen compared to the preceding quality that came before it – in any medium. At literally every level, it’s objectively terrible.[/b]

Sloppy execution that reuses art assets reveals that it’s a hurried inclusion. The under thought and over pretentious dialogue does nothing but create bizarre, confusing plot holes. It even commits the same sin The Devil Inside did earlier this year, and has the gall to add an advertisement by the producers at the end of the credits, which is frankly insulting. 

Far more importantly though, it betrays key themes and values well established by the series thus far. Past player choice impacting the shape of events is negated in favor of an arbitrary and poorly explained “pick your favorite color” moment. Science fiction justification in an otherwise material world is abandoned for magical deism, since quite literally, a god in a machine appears. Unification through altruism and sacrifice is thrown out for pure nihilism: each of the choices you’re forced to make results in Shepard committing some level of genocide or another, with the benefits removed from any relatable emotional touchstone to the intangible space of far flung statistics. It even manages to make The Reapers, one of the more imposing forces of antagonism in recent memory, come across as foolish pawns.

Out of curiosity, how did they rate ME1 and ME2? Those games themselves had some notable flaws as well. And by notable, systematic throughout the games, rather than isolated in the finale.

(And no, writer, it wasn't nihilism. And since destroying the Reapers was always going to be genocide, you better have been complaining about it before. And the Reapers were only super-imposing if you didn't think on how they could have easily ****ed things up by acting smarter in the other games.)

#15
PaulSX

PaulSX
  • Members
  • 1 127 messages
wow, in the meantime they gave Dragon Age 2 a 4/5. LoL

#16
sAxMoNkI

sAxMoNkI
  • Members
  • 923 messages

QuarianHIV wrote...

All we have to do now is wait for some BW drone like Eternal5 show up and call the review crap.


Ease up, no need to call people out. They're allowed to have a different opinion.

#17
Billabong2011

Billabong2011
  • Members
  • 738 messages
Wow, that was a wonderful explanation from a literary standpoint. And so much more concise than I could ever manage myself!! :)

#18
WarBaby2

WarBaby2
  • Members
  • 1 019 messages
So much for "it's art".^^

Come on BW, admit you made a bubu and fix it!

Hold the line!

#19
Shalewind

Shalewind
  • Members
  • 117 messages
Well put.

#20
ElectronicPostingInterface

ElectronicPostingInterface
  • Members
  • 3 789 messages
Interesting to see reviews from non-gaming outlets.

#21
iiTzCyAniiDe

iiTzCyAniiDe
  • Members
  • 172 messages
A little extreme- even if the endings aren't that good, in my opinion its way better than 2.5, the game is amazing, just the end needs changing, not really worth taking away half a score mark for just 10 mins.

#22
Fingertrip

Fingertrip
  • Members
  • 1 192 messages

wow, in the meantime they gave Dragon Age 2 a 4/5. LoL

Credability died instantly, not that they had any from the start anyway.

Just a blatant hater. The game was top-notch on all fronts up until ending. But you can't put the whole empthasize on the ending, because in that case- alot of movies/games/books would have gotten the ****-taste in their reviews. Let's not make ME3 an exclusive victim.

#23
ChampDude

ChampDude
  • Members
  • 283 messages
A little harsh, but I can see the ending being THAT detrimental to the experience for someone so I can't really blame the reviewer. I wonder if they would do a re-review if Bioware did release an epilogue DLC or revised the ending (probably not)

#24
Nexis7

Nexis7
  • Members
  • 557 messages
>20+ hour game
>last 5-10mins are bad
>2.5/5

stay classy

#25
Killer3000ad

Killer3000ad
  • Members
  • 1 221 messages
Another non-gaming site calls the endings like it is, ABSOLUTE RUBBISH. And literature and ARTS site to boot!

Yes Bioware, even the experts on literature and ARTS think your artsy and deep ending was crap.