Google document containing every glaring flaw in the ending of Mass Effect 3
#76
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 07:33
#77
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 07:33
DocDoomII wrote...
If I had written the ending I'd go bury myself somewhere for the shame after having read that document.
Yep, severe bout of depression and instant change of line of work.
I'd be devastated if I was the writer and had my "work" summed up like this.
#78
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 07:37
The reality is that the list of faults is really good. Those are mostly geniuine, true faults. Terrible plotholes, poor reasoning, just bad writing. The sad reality is that indoctrination wasn't intended, yet it creates a MORE consistent, less plot-hole ridden solution to the story. Not intended, but true. Bioware should use that. They figuratively stumbled into a workable solution they didn't intend. They should USE it.
The only criticism I have of the list is that the line where Sovereign said "we have no beginning or end" should be taken firgulatively rather than literally. There has to be a history to how the Reapers came about. Having an origin to me is not a plothole. A lack of an origin is a plothole. I'm okay with the idea that Sovereign might have figuratively thought of himself as having no true beginning because it is made up of millions of consciousnesses, each of which might have had different beginnings.
#79
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 07:39
#80
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 07:39
TexasToast712 wrote...
Needs to be updated with he/she, him/her.
Not everyone plays as femshep.
And it matters how?
The point is the glaring plot holes and failure in logic.
#81
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 07:40
Otherwise, yes very good read. My girlfriend and I discussed quite a few of them, yet there were still many I didn't even notice/consider.
#82
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 07:47
#83
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 07:49
#84
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 07:50
#85
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 07:51
#86
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 07:55
lashrouxed wrote...
Being updated as we speak and I cannot lie...most if not every single one of these points make sense! https://docs.google....?pli=1&sle=true
This make a lot of assumptions, then says the game makes no sense like it is fact, when the assumptions have glaring holes themselves.
A few good points, but mostly bad ones.
#87
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 07:57
Thank you, whoever wrote this.
#88
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 08:00
I agree with indoc theory entirely but don't think this statement from the document helps prove or disprove any theory. But damn his got a point. haha
#89
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 08:00
#90
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 08:03
#91
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 08:03
fantasypisces wrote...
I just want to point out that in the English language, the standard pronoun to represent monogender is "she". Just for all those saying it should be he/she.
Otherwise, yes very good read. My girlfriend and I discussed quite a few of them, yet there were still many I didn't even notice/consider.
I'm fairly certain it's he. And/or no one will rule one way or another because of sexism.
I still use he for mono-gender and neutral. Might be author bias. But it certainly isn't established language convention, especially when contrasted with other languages ours developed from.
#92
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 08:03
A must see, Mr Hudson!
Modifié par Sonicsnak3, 18 mars 2012 - 08:03 .
#93
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 08:03
#94
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 08:03
#95
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 08:03
You just hate the indoc.theory....the author of this document is not implying that the indoc theory is fact....he just says that the only possible way for the plotholes to make sense is if the theory were true....he even states the document isn't based on the indoc theory....he just lists all of the plotholes....plain and simple....don't hate just because you saw the words "indoctrination theory" within the document
#96
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 08:05
Mcfly616 wrote...
@KylieDog:
You just hate the indoc.theory....the author of this document is not implying that the indoc theory is fact....he just says that the only possible way for the plotholes to make sense is if the theory were true....he even states the document isn't based on the indoc theory....he just lists all of the plotholes....plain and simple....don't hate just because you saw the words "indoctrination theory" within the document
this one makes sense *hanar voice*
#97
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 08:06
Modifié par BlahDog, 18 mars 2012 - 08:10 .
#98
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 08:08
xD
#99
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 08:09
Does someone has a good video that shows that?. I remember a completly new voice.
#100
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 08:14
Sesshaku wrote...
I never noticed that "double shepard voice" of the Child.
Does someone has a good video that shows that?. I remember a completly new voice.
the video is all good..except 1 mistake at the start.
But from 10 mins the double shep voice is mentioned. closest clip i have found





Retour en haut







