Ce sujet est fermé
_symphony wrote...
dude, going to FTC isn't like making a lawsuit. That's FTC's job to decide.
and your point is? You don't exercise your rights as a consumer because you're afraid of being laughed at?Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
dude, going to FTC isn't like making a lawsuit. That's FTC's job to decide.
the ftc is going to laugh at it because they have real issues to deal with
_symphony wrote...
and your point is? You don't exercise your rights as a consumer because you're afraid of being laughed at?Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
dude, going to FTC isn't like making a lawsuit. That's FTC's job to decide.
the ftc is going to laugh at it because they have real issues to deal with
Modifié par Tazzmission, 18 mars 2012 - 11:29 .
Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
and your point is? You don't exercise your rights as a consumer because you're afraid of being laughed at?Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
dude, going to FTC isn't like making a lawsuit. That's FTC's job to decide.
the ftc is going to laugh at it because they have real issues to deal with
no im saying the country is going to hell in a handbasket and you people think the ending to a game is more important
what do you think the ftc will say hey sorry the country can wait wile people are losing jobs so we can attend to some 40 year old virgin dressed like spock from star trek who is whining about a 5 minute scene thatll most likely be a FREE dlc in a month?
im anti government but i will say this ( even though i hate saying it) they have other crap to fix that actually does in fact matter and affect real lives
yea makes alot of sence <_<
Modifié par SalsaDMA, 18 mars 2012 - 11:35 .
SalsaDMA wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
and your point is? You don't exercise your rights as a consumer because you're afraid of being laughed at?Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
dude, going to FTC isn't like making a lawsuit. That's FTC's job to decide.
the ftc is going to laugh at it because they have real issues to deal with
no im saying the country is going to hell in a handbasket and you people think the ending to a game is more important
what do you think the ftc will say hey sorry the country can wait wile people are losing jobs so we can attend to some 40 year old virgin dressed like spock from star trek who is whining about a 5 minute scene thatll most likely be a FREE dlc in a month?
im anti government but i will say this ( even though i hate saying it) they have other crap to fix that actually does in fact matter and affect real lives
yea makes alot of sence <_<
The problem with your comment is that according to the FTCs own webpage, the filed complaint is exactly what they are supposed to deal with: Claims of false product specifications.
If you are saying that an institution shouldn't deal with cases it is specifically tasked to deal with, then I don't know what else to say as nothing will make sense in a conversatino with you.
Modifié par Tazzmission, 18 mars 2012 - 11:37 .
Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
and your point is? You don't exercise your rights as a consumer because you're afraid of being laughed at?Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
dude, going to FTC isn't like making a lawsuit. That's FTC's job to decide.
the ftc is going to laugh at it because they have real issues to deal with
no im saying the country is going to hell in a handbasket and you people think the ending to a game is more important
Tazzmission wrote...
SalsaDMA wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
and your point is? You don't exercise your rights as a consumer because you're afraid of being laughed at?Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
dude, going to FTC isn't like making a lawsuit. That's FTC's job to decide.
the ftc is going to laugh at it because they have real issues to deal with
no im saying the country is going to hell in a handbasket and you people think the ending to a game is more important
what do you think the ftc will say hey sorry the country can wait wile people are losing jobs so we can attend to some 40 year old virgin dressed like spock from star trek who is whining about a 5 minute scene thatll most likely be a FREE dlc in a month?
im anti government but i will say this ( even though i hate saying it) they have other crap to fix that actually does in fact matter and affect real lives
yea makes alot of sence <_<
The problem with your comment is that according to the FTCs own webpage, the filed complaint is exactly what they are supposed to deal with: Claims of false product specifications.
If you are saying that an institution shouldn't deal with cases it is specifically tasked to deal with, then I don't know what else to say as nothing will make sense in a conversatino with you.
anti trust huh? ok well let me ask you this. dont you think the banks that have lied about the housing market crashing should be put to the side for this mass effect 3 ending fiasco?
afterall people dont trust banks now regarding loans for homes
should someone lose there appointment to some idiot who has nothing in life but just videogames?
i guess the ending to me3 is more important to taking a bank frauder tovcourt right?
Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
dude, going to FTC isn't like making a lawsuit. That's FTC's job to decide.
the ftc is going to laugh at it because they have real issues to deal with
the country is broke and you think there gona let that be set aside to please some pissed off gamer about a 5 minute cutscene?
if anything theyll tell the guy hes 40 laugh at him and tell him to grow up
Modifié par Wolder88, 18 mars 2012 - 11:39 .
MelfinaofOutlawStar wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
and your point is? You don't exercise your rights as a consumer because you're afraid of being laughed at?Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
dude, going to FTC isn't like making a lawsuit. That's FTC's job to decide.
the ftc is going to laugh at it because they have real issues to deal with
no im saying the country is going to hell in a handbasket and you people think the ending to a game is more important
Then it is a wonder you're spending so much time on here rather than trying to fix this country. Assuming you mean the US.
Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*
XxTaLoNxX wrote...
@ Tazmission - You seem to forget that there are many government agencies all tasked to do different things. You also seem to assume (incorrectly at that) that if the FTC did in fact take interest in the case it would somehow (space magic) stop all the other government agencies from doing their jobs and that our government would come to a screeching halt.
Does it hurt?
Modifié par Tazzmission, 18 mars 2012 - 11:46 .
Tazzmission wrote...
XxTaLoNxX wrote...
@ Tazmission - You seem to forget that there are many government agencies all tasked to do different things. You also seem to assume (incorrectly at that) that if the FTC did in fact take interest in the case it would somehow (space magic) stop all the other government agencies from doing their jobs and that our government would come to a screeching halt.
Does it hurt?
im just saying bringing the federal government into something so minor imo is sad and pathetic
you do realize if this is taken seriously more idiotic claims will be made right?
heres an example from last year and at the rate you people keep throwing they false advertised this is what will happen
Woman sues to stop Drive getting away with a 'misleading' trailer
Most people's gripe about trailers these days is that they blow too much info about a film's plot. But not Sarah Deming. This Michigan resident is suing the distributor of the critically acclaimed Ryan Gosling thriller Drive– as well as the cinema where she saw it – claiming it was publicised as a Fast and Furious style action piece but turned out to be nothing of the sort.In her suit, which was filed at the sixth judicial circuit court in Oakland, Michigan, Deming says the Nicolas Winding Refn film "bore very little similarity to a chase, or race action film ... having very little driving in the motion picture".The plaintiff goes on to attack Drive for what she perceives as antisemitic leanings. The film "substantially contained extreme, gratuitous, dehumanising racism directed at members of the Jewish faith, and thereby promoted criminal violence against members of the Jewish faith", her suit reads.Deming hopes to turn her appeal into a class action suit, which would allow cinemagoers across the US to sue on similar grounds if they found themselves watching films on the basis of a misleading trailer. Both the Emagine cinema in Novi, Michigan, and distributor FilmDistrict are expected to vigorously contest. Emagine has already pointed out that it would have been happy to refund the cost of the ticket bought by Ms Deming, which is the suit's only demand.Drive, about a Hollywood stunt performer who moonlights as a getaway driver, has been warmly received by most critics. The winner of the best director award at Cannes currently holds a 93% "fresh" rating on the reviews website rottentomatoes.com.
http://www.guardian....s-drive-trailer
congratulations for idiots like that woman even have a case and and the rate you guys are blowing this up itll keep happening
Tazzmission wrote...
MelfinaofOutlawStar wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
and your point is? You don't exercise your rights as a consumer because you're afraid of being laughed at?Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
dude, going to FTC isn't like making a lawsuit. That's FTC's job to decide.
the ftc is going to laugh at it because they have real issues to deal with
no im saying the country is going to hell in a handbasket and you people think the ending to a game is more important
Then it is a wonder you're spending so much time on here rather than trying to fix this country. Assuming you mean the US.
i would run but im only 27. you have to be 35 to do so
Wolder88 wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
XxTaLoNxX wrote...
@ Tazmission - You seem to forget that there are many government agencies all tasked to do different things. You also seem to assume (incorrectly at that) that if the FTC did in fact take interest in the case it would somehow (space magic) stop all the other government agencies from doing their jobs and that our government would come to a screeching halt.
Does it hurt?
im just saying bringing the federal government into something so minor imo is sad and pathetic
you do realize if this is taken seriously more idiotic claims will be made right?
heres an example from last year and at the rate you people keep throwing they false advertised this is what will happen
Woman sues to stop Drive getting away with a 'misleading' trailer
Most people's gripe about trailers these days is that they blow too much info about a film's plot. But not Sarah Deming. This Michigan resident is suing the distributor of the critically acclaimed Ryan Gosling thriller Drive– as well as the cinema where she saw it – claiming it was publicised as a Fast and Furious style action piece but turned out to be nothing of the sort.In her suit, which was filed at the sixth judicial circuit court in Oakland, Michigan, Deming says the Nicolas Winding Refn film "bore very little similarity to a chase, or race action film ... having very little driving in the motion picture".The plaintiff goes on to attack Drive for what she perceives as antisemitic leanings. The film "substantially contained extreme, gratuitous, dehumanising racism directed at members of the Jewish faith, and thereby promoted criminal violence against members of the Jewish faith", her suit reads.Deming hopes to turn her appeal into a class action suit, which would allow cinemagoers across the US to sue on similar grounds if they found themselves watching films on the basis of a misleading trailer. Both the Emagine cinema in Novi, Michigan, and distributor FilmDistrict are expected to vigorously contest. Emagine has already pointed out that it would have been happy to refund the cost of the ticket bought by Ms Deming, which is the suit's only demand.Drive, about a Hollywood stunt performer who moonlights as a getaway driver, has been warmly received by most critics. The winner of the best director award at Cannes currently holds a 93% "fresh" rating on the reviews website rottentomatoes.com.
http://www.guardian....s-drive-trailer
congratulations for idiots like that woman even have a case and and the rate you guys are blowing this up itll keep happening
What is considered "idiotic claims" is a political question, since it effects public policy and I dont think we can discuss politics here at the BSN.
Modifié par Tazzmission, 18 mars 2012 - 11:54 .
redplague wrote...
Casey Hudson has embarrased himself and disgraced his company.
Modifié par Alchemist4, 19 mars 2012 - 12:07 .
r00tb33r wrote...
While FTC is fair game since BioWare failed to deliver the promised features in their product, however I believe it should be unnecessary, as with cases like Apple, a large public backlash results in the company giving way to the pressure. There are other cases though, like Netflix, but it was different since price hikes and content removal were a pure money decision. I doubt the senseless ending and rushed story were a money decision for BioWare though, so I doubt that it will be the deciding factor in their decision on how to handle this fallout.
Tazzmission wrote...
Wolder88 wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
XxTaLoNxX wrote...
@ Tazmission - You seem to forget that there are many government agencies all tasked to do different things. You also seem to assume (incorrectly at that) that if the FTC did in fact take interest in the case it would somehow (space magic) stop all the other government agencies from doing their jobs and that our government would come to a screeching halt.
Does it hurt?
im just saying bringing the federal government into something so minor imo is sad and pathetic
you do realize if this is taken seriously more idiotic claims will be made right?
heres an example from last year and at the rate you people keep throwing they false advertised this is what will happen
Woman sues to stop Drive getting away with a 'misleading' trailer
Most people's gripe about trailers these days is that they blow too much info about a film's plot. But not Sarah Deming. This Michigan resident is suing the distributor of the critically acclaimed Ryan Gosling thriller Drive– as well as the cinema where she saw it – claiming it was publicised as a Fast and Furious style action piece but turned out to be nothing of the sort.In her suit, which was filed at the sixth judicial circuit court in Oakland, Michigan, Deming says the Nicolas Winding Refn film "bore very little similarity to a chase, or race action film ... having very little driving in the motion picture".The plaintiff goes on to attack Drive for what she perceives as antisemitic leanings. The film "substantially contained extreme, gratuitous, dehumanising racism directed at members of the Jewish faith, and thereby promoted criminal violence against members of the Jewish faith", her suit reads.Deming hopes to turn her appeal into a class action suit, which would allow cinemagoers across the US to sue on similar grounds if they found themselves watching films on the basis of a misleading trailer. Both the Emagine cinema in Novi, Michigan, and distributor FilmDistrict are expected to vigorously contest. Emagine has already pointed out that it would have been happy to refund the cost of the ticket bought by Ms Deming, which is the suit's only demand.Drive, about a Hollywood stunt performer who moonlights as a getaway driver, has been warmly received by most critics. The winner of the best director award at Cannes currently holds a 93% "fresh" rating on the reviews website rottentomatoes.com.
http://www.guardian....s-drive-trailer
congratulations for idiots like that woman even have a case and and the rate you guys are blowing this up itll keep happening
What is considered "idiotic claims" is a political question, since it effects public policy and I dont think we can discuss politics here at the BSN.
well the ftc is federal so im sticking to the topic
are people this bent out of shape about something stupid to where there gona demand a law from the president next saying consumers are now entiled to money damages next?
so there going to make money on a property they themselves never worked on?
at the rate fans are going i wouldnt be suprised if that does happen
MelfinaofOutlawStar wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
MelfinaofOutlawStar wrote...
Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
and your point is? You don't exercise your rights as a consumer because you're afraid of being laughed at?Tazzmission wrote...
_symphony wrote...
dude, going to FTC isn't like making a lawsuit. That's FTC's job to decide.
the ftc is going to laugh at it because they have real issues to deal with
no im saying the country is going to hell in a handbasket and you people think the ending to a game is more important
Then it is a wonder you're spending so much time on here rather than trying to fix this country. Assuming you mean the US.
i would run but im only 27. you have to be 35 to do so
You don't have to run for president to be involved in the politics or decision making. And complaining against the opinions of a game on a message board is certainly not a way to start.
Retour en haut
