"Angry Joe's Top 10 Reasons We Hate Mass Effect 3's Ending"
#101
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:50
#102
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:51
Valo_Soren wrote...
Angry joe is an idiot and is nothing more then just another gamer, when he gets hired on by IGN I'd take his opinion far more seriously, in this case he is just jumping on your alls band wagon to remain popular on youtube.
Why is he an idiot?
Who hired you?
Joe makes good points. If you don't like his points then ignore him instead of posting in this thread. Glad you just let everyone in this thread know that your truely not mature enough to handle anything that goes against what you believe.
Again, Angry Joe pretty much sums up well why people are upset with how BioWare ended Mass Effect 3. Doesn't have to be a super "happy" "hollywood" etc... ending. The game deserves better!
#103
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:51
#104
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:51
#105
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:52
#106
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:52
Also great comment about "why the hell NOT have a happy ending? The current 'trend' is towards twist endings so why not buck that trend?"
#107
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:53
#108
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:53
AmaraDark wrote...
I don't always agree with Joe - but he handled this very intelligently, and calmly. He sums up my feelings on the whole thing.
Joe has his moments of gushing (like his Skyrim review) but overall he's rather honest about his opinions and tends to be rather fair.
I was also taken back by how calm he was during the Top 10 Review. He can have his moments of flying off the rocker, but here he kept his composure.
#109
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:54
Costin_Razvan wrote...
I firmly believe they were just that lazy with it. It's obviously intentional to omit the explosion and show the citadel intact. They don't tell us know, no, but there is logic in the claim that Control does not destroy the Relays.
It just gives me a headache. Honestly it would take one scene to say "the mass relays aren't destroyed because of space bunnies or whatever". Ugh, gives me a headache.
Yeah it's just dumb. Really I would have been happy to just have Anderson as the guy strongly advocating for Destroy and TIM for Control with the consequences for each choice laid down clearly.
Martin Sheen and Keith David sure beat the hell out of making poor Meer and Hale voice lines along with some kid and pull Shepard around by the nose.
His entire argument on the destuction of the Relays is completely pointless if he fails to ignore all perspectives. I don't hate Joe. I've watched his reviews for a long time, but I do hate his views on certain things where he clearly ignores important stuff.
I took close examination of the ending comparison video several times before I came to the conclusion that there was a possibility that the relays are preserved. He may not even have ever chosen that ending.
It's vague as hell. I mean, I know a lot of people who've chosen Control and aren't aware the Citadel was preserved, because it's very "blink and you'll miss it".
#110
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:54
defenestrated wrote...
Check out this video at about the 1:28 mark. They're destroyed in the control ending, just as the space child told us they would be.Costin_Razvan wrote...
defenestrated: The Citadel CONTROLS the Relays AND the Reapers, it being destroyed makes sense if you are going to destroy all the Relays in Destroy/Synthesis. It being NOT destroyed, and NOT firing the beam makes no sense unless the Relays are not destroyed in Control.
Ah yes, watch the control. As if I haven't
As I've stated before: Explain the Citadel with good logic.
#111
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:55
greatgeek wrote...
Nailed it. I hope these other so called "professional reviewers" can get their heads out of their asses long enough to rediscover some semblance of integrity.
#112
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:56
joopark wrote...
Valo_Soren wrote...
Angry joe is an idiot and is nothing more then just another gamer, when he gets hired on by IGN I'd take his opinion far more seriously, in this case he is just jumping on your alls band wagon to remain popular on youtube.
Why is he an idiot?
Who hired you?
Joe makes good points. If you don't like his points then ignore him instead of posting in this thread. Glad you just let everyone in this thread know that your truely not mature enough to handle anything that goes against what you believe.
Again, Angry Joe pretty much sums up well why people are upset with how BioWare ended Mass Effect 3. Doesn't have to be a super "happy" "hollywood" etc... ending. The game deserves better!
I think he was being sarcastic....otherwise he's an idiot that fell in an argumentum ad hominem.
#113
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:56
#114
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:57
#115
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:57
#116
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:58
#117
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 09:59
#118
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:00
Sesshaku wrote...
joopark wrote...
Valo_Soren wrote...
Angry joe is an idiot and is nothing more then just another gamer, when he gets hired on by IGN I'd take his opinion far more seriously, in this case he is just jumping on your alls band wagon to remain popular on youtube.
Why is he an idiot?
Who hired you?
Joe makes good points. If you don't like his points then ignore him instead of posting in this thread. Glad you just let everyone in this thread know that your truely not mature enough to handle anything that goes against what you believe.
Again, Angry Joe pretty much sums up well why people are upset with how BioWare ended Mass Effect 3. Doesn't have to be a super "happy" "hollywood" etc... ending. The game deserves better!
I think he was being sarcastic....otherwise he's an idiot that fell in an argumentum ad hominem.
What "truth" he is trying to negate? He simply explaining why many fans, myself included, find the ending sub-par.
#119
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:00
#120
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:03
#121
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:03
Costin_Razvan wrote...
Ah yes, watch the control. As if I haven't
As I've stated before: Explain the Citadel with good logic.
Better video - Control do destroy the relays (2:15 boom):
Explain Citadel with logic? None of us cant, because there is nothing logic about the ending(s).
Could just be one of the many design oversight, but again thats the hole point of his video no?.
Modifié par Zhijn, 18 mars 2012 - 10:07 .
#122
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:03
#123
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:03
#124
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:04
#125
Posté 18 mars 2012 - 10:04





Retour en haut





