Aller au contenu

Photo

Why should Bioware make a ending DLC?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
288 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Nevaeh15

Nevaeh15
  • Members
  • 107 messages

Captian Cornhole wrote...

What promises did Bioware break again? It can't be too hard to actually name a few and back up your claims.



alizrak.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/the-broken-promises-of-mass-effect-3-spoilers/

#27
Vaktathi

Vaktathi
  • Members
  • 752 messages

Captian Cornhole wrote...

What promises did Bioware break again? It can't be too hard to actually name a few and back up your claims.

Just for the quick and easy, "the ending won't be "pick door A/B/C"

The ending was "pick door A/B/C" or rather..."red/blue/green". 

http://i686.photobuc...iver1/xUq9t.png 

#28
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 989 messages
These entitled brats would cause a terrible precedent if they succeeded. This would lead to devs compromising the integrity of their stories or worse yet, deliberately scam their fanbase with "ending dlc".

#29
Guest_Logan Cloud_*

Guest_Logan Cloud_*
  • Guests
It's not hating the endings that irks me. It's all of your levels of self-entitlement that you have. Seriously people, get over yourselves. No one cares about how important you THINK you are, because when it comes down to it, you're just another egotistical douche bag who thinks you can make demands towards an entire company.

#30
HenchxNarf

HenchxNarf
  • Members
  • 2 029 messages

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

Ghost Warrior wrote...

I agree with you OP,but was it necessary to create another thread about this?

Just counter every hold the line you see with end of the line.

Um, why? Why are you even participating in this? If you like the ending, you have every reason to not buy whatever fixing of it they do. You have no stake in this whatsoever, unless you're a plant trying to divide and conquer.

Why shouldn't he participate? Because he disagrees with you?


LOL Logic, I love it. Something these people lack in droves.

IA.

End of the line.

#31
Kaiser Shepard

Kaiser Shepard
  • Members
  • 7 890 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

Why shouldn't he participate? Because he disagrees with you?

Oh, good grief. Look, I know TIM got annoyed at you for playing with me, but I'm sure he'll understand if you apologize well enough. You don't need to keep following me around.

I'm not following you around, bro. Like I told you yesterday: don't flatter yourself, it doesn't suit ya.

#32
JMA22TB

JMA22TB
  • Members
  • 623 messages
Captain Cornhole look up the threads. If you do some research you'll see. There's no point in linking it to you it's obvious you need to do the research yourself. We don't have to present it to you it's all over the place.

#33
HenchxNarf

HenchxNarf
  • Members
  • 2 029 messages

Captian Cornhole wrote...

What promises did Bioware break again? It can't be too hard to actually name a few and back up your claims.


They made a whole thread for that already and its silly because they never broke any promises. It's just that they can't see that.

#34
Legion64

Legion64
  • Members
  • 2 126 messages
Check the link in my signature. You will see a few things that devs promised that were never fufilled in the actual game.

#35
Farbautisonn

Farbautisonn
  • Members
  • 3 083 messages

Seboist wrote...

These entitled brats would cause a terrible precedent if they succeeded. This would lead to devs compromising the integrity of their stories or worse yet, deliberately scam their fanbase with "ending dlc".


"The integrity of their stories" has been compromised by themselves and by people they employed and backed once allready with Deception.

#36
Farbautisonn

Farbautisonn
  • Members
  • 3 083 messages

HenchxNarf wrote...
They made a whole thread for that already and its silly because they never broke any promises. It's just that they can't see that.


-And if they never broke any of those promises it would be easy to refute for a person such as yourself, yes? 

#37
StarcloudSWG

StarcloudSWG
  • Members
  • 2 659 messages
They should make an ending DLC in order to stem the tide of lost sales due to poor word of mouth, and to repair the self-inflicted damage to their brand name and reputation.

#38
CoS Sarah Jinstar

CoS Sarah Jinstar
  • Members
  • 2 169 messages
If they didn't care about hits to the reputation after the travesty that was Dragon Age II, I hardly think they're going to start caring now.

#39
Taavo

Taavo
  • Members
  • 87 messages

Seboist wrote...

These entitled brats would cause a terrible precedent if they succeeded. This would lead to devs compromising the integrity of their stories or worse yet, deliberately scam their fanbase with "ending dlc".


Name calling? Immature post is immature.

#40
Ghost Warrior

Ghost Warrior
  • Members
  • 1 846 messages
Image IPB

#41
Captian Cornhole

Captian Cornhole
  • Members
  • 214 messages

Nevaeh15 wrote...

Captian Cornhole wrote...

What promises did Bioware break again? It can't be too hard to actually name a few and back up your claims.



alizrak.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/the-broken-promises-of-mass-effect-3-spoilers/


And how are those promises? 


#42
dragonflight288

dragonflight288
  • Members
  • 8 852 messages
End of the Line. until someone posts after me, then they'll be at the end of the two page thread line. lol.

#43
Nevaeh15

Nevaeh15
  • Members
  • 107 messages

CoS Sarah Jinstar wrote...

If they didn't care about hits to the reputation after the travesty that was Dragon Age II, I hardly think they're going to start caring now.



They did so well in ME3 though... it was almost perfect... Except for the parts that were so lazily done that they basically run everything... 

If we didn't care about Bioware or their reputation we'd be silent I think...   I'd rather Bioware not be known for DA2 and ME3's ending.   I want my old Bioware back.  :(

#44
Vaktathi

Vaktathi
  • Members
  • 752 messages

Captian Cornhole wrote...

Besides making moar money, gimme a reason why. A reason why besides saying it "sucked" cause that is a matter of preference, and preferences are not fact.

Because in the end, it is their franchise and they can do what they want with it. The haters aren't entitled to anything, nor should they recieve one based off the childish ways they are acting. It is sad to see a group of people so butthurt over a videogame. Seriously what ever happened to getting a job and moving out of mother's basement.

Of course I speak in broad generalizations, but that said Bioware owes you nothing.

Primarily to smooth over controversy and generate additonal goodwill, considering goodwill and their reputation is a huge part of what makes their games successful and their company worth something. 

#45
CoS Sarah Jinstar

CoS Sarah Jinstar
  • Members
  • 2 169 messages

Captian Cornhole wrote...

Nevaeh15 wrote...

Captian Cornhole wrote...

What promises did Bioware break again? It can't be too hard to actually name a few and back up your claims.



alizrak.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/the-broken-promises-of-mass-effect-3-spoilers/


And how are those promises? 


How's the EAware brand kool aid taste there cappy? If you can't see how decietful those quotes are in regards to how the game actually played out, maybe there's a future in PR for you.

#46
Nevaeh15

Nevaeh15
  • Members
  • 107 messages

Captian Cornhole wrote...

Nevaeh15 wrote...

Captian Cornhole wrote...

What promises did Bioware break again? It can't be too hard to actually name a few and back up your claims.



alizrak.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/the-broken-promises-of-mass-effect-3-spoilers/


And how are those promises? 


It's called marketing....  It's what they say to make you buy the game.  It's what they're selling you.  If I buy what they're selling me and it turns out that what they say their selling me is not what I bought,  then it's false advertising.  

Not that complicated.... shouldn't have to explain it.

#47
Captian Cornhole

Captian Cornhole
  • Members
  • 214 messages

Taavo wrote...

Seboist wrote...

These entitled brats would cause a terrible precedent if they succeeded. This would lead to devs compromising the integrity of their stories or worse yet, deliberately scam their fanbase with "ending dlc".


Name calling? Immature post is immature.


Well it's the truth. Since when was telling the truth inmature?  Sandra Fluke is a ****, and their isn't a good reason Rush should say otherwise. And yes I just made that comparison.

Modifié par Captian Cornhole, 18 mars 2012 - 10:55 .


#48
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 989 messages

Farbautisonn wrote...

Seboist wrote...

These entitled brats would cause a terrible precedent if they succeeded. This would lead to devs compromising the integrity of their stories or worse yet, deliberately scam their fanbase with "ending dlc".


"The integrity of their stories" has been compromised by themselves and by people they employed and backed once allready with Deception.


Pray tell, where was all the great fan outrage over Cerberus being retconned into a galactic superpower that overshadows the reapers or the extremely weak crucible plot that contrivedly provides a magic reaper on/off switch that shows up half hour into the third entry of a trilogy and conveniently shows up right under the noses of our heroes on Mars? Where for that matter is the outrage over the abysmal handling of past choices PRIOR to the ending?

It ALMOST seems as if though the butthurt stems from the crucible not being magically convenient enough so their Shepards can have a rainbows and bunnies ending with their virtual waifus/manfus. :lol:

#49
Vaktathi

Vaktathi
  • Members
  • 752 messages

Seboist wrote...

These entitled brats would cause a terrible precedent if they succeeded. This would lead to devs compromising the integrity of their stories or worse yet, deliberately scam their fanbase with "ending dlc".

It's already been done numerous times in just about every form of media. Sherlock Holmes, Great Expectations, Fallout 3, etc. 

I don't see how holding a developer to the promises made and the expected quality level of a product advertsised is being entitled. It's about standing up for your rights as a consumer.


Seboist wrote...

Pray tell, where was all the great fan outrage over Cerberus being retconned into a galactic superpower that overshadows the reapers

who says it overshadows the reapers? they grew a lot and are after the same things you are after so you end up in the same places quite often. 

or the extremely weak crucible plot that contrivedly provides a magic reaper on/off switch that shows up half hour into the third entry of a trilogy and conveniently shows up right under the noses of our heroes on Mars?

They never say it's a reaper on/off switch, throughout much of the game they don't even know what it does. And yes, the whole Crucible thing is a big part of *why* people dislike the ending.

Where for that matter is the outrage over the abysmal handling of past choices PRIOR to the ending? 

Such as? 


It ALMOST seems as if though the butthurt stems from the crucible not being magically convenient enough so their Shepards can have a rainbows and bunnies ending with their virtual waifus/manfus. [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie]

 
Which pretty much shows you're either deliberatley trolling, or you purposefully have avoided comprehending pretty much every argument as to why people don't like the endings. 

Modifié par Vaktathi, 18 mars 2012 - 10:53 .


#50
ArcanistLibram

ArcanistLibram
  • Members
  • 1 036 messages
Bioware made a mistake and if they want to retain my business, they will fix it. That's why they should make an ending DLC.