berguina wrote...
MDT1 wrote...
If Bioware wants to make games only for the artistic value they have to them, they should stop trying to sell them.
At this point art becomes also a product, and the value of a product is determind by the customer.
Art is always sponsored by someone, tipically some big sponsor in the past, now more offen by a lot of people. Artists have depenses too, like any human in this world. If you don't like their products, don't buy them.
If you have already bought the product and other products in line of the same production series which are interconnected, and the quality of the product is dissatisfying, than it is totally legit to give a negative feedback on this matter.
Nothing else happens here. Only on a huge scale. Which means, that there are a lot of people dissatisified with the product. Now, you can change the product and make money of it, plus regaining these potential customers for future products of said production line, or you can play the "artistic value" card, thereby alienating these customers further and loose them for the future, which might be a bad businessdecision.
You know, I totally respect the freedom of art. I also totally respect the freedom of speech. And if their is an opionion about the games ending, and this opinion is neither insulting nor against any rules of civil behaviour, than it should be allowed to be said. Without anyone replying "THAN DONT BUY THERE PRODUCT!". You know, many who are complaining here won`t buy any more products from BioWare since this is fixed.
And it is totally legit to ask for a change of even a story arc in a fiction (which is art). It`s not like we are rampaging through canada and threatening BioWare to either change it or face serious consequences.
We ask for it. And we say what happens when we don`t get it: we will spend our money elsewhere. I don`t see how this position would harm any ideal of art. It`s the artist freedom to stick to his idea. He will face the consequences by financial loss. Thats the businessaspect of art.