Aller au contenu

Photo

Website speculates ending was rushed (no spoilers)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
96 réponses à ce sujet

#1
terralax

terralax
  • Members
  • 13 messages
http://www.inenterta...t-3-conclusion/

Says it all really. Effectively they ran out of time to finish a proper ending and went with the easy speculative ending. As a professional writer, I know  this is a trick to cut corners and save time. When a number of devs question whether or not the ending can be completed in time you have to worrry as Bioware staff do know what they are doing and this was back in march 2011. The ending as it currrently stands wasn't implemented to very late in 2011, by all indications December. They had to cut a good deal from what they wanted to do, and as it has been stated during the DLC controversy the game was sent for certification in Jan 2012.

I have a great deal of sympathy for the staff who worked on ME3 and their hard work. Spinning the game by stating that you are not going to do something with the ending and then doing exactly that is an affront to anyone who buys it.  It would have been much better to end the game as it currently does with the additional "secret" scene and a to be continued...and used the end pop-up message to state the coming of a free DLC to wrap it all up Rather than use the development time after the game was sent to be certifed to make the from the Ashes DLC. A quick PR statement to this end, saying that BW/EA appreciates it customers and that they made the creative decision that ensuring the game had the best ending was in the interests of all.

Modifié par terralax, 19 mars 2012 - 03:54 .


#2
coles4971

coles4971
  • Members
  • 458 messages
Well they rushed out the ending because some idiots leaked the story before release.

No way can Bioware take all the blame for this.

#3
F00lishG

F00lishG
  • Members
  • 283 messages
...What? How could they have run out of time? We was told that ME3 was fully playable Christmas 2010. And then they delayed it 3 months from Christmas 2011...Why weren't the endings like the 5th thing they worked on. At first I was okay with the current endings. I'm not now.

#4
Deflagratio

Deflagratio
  • Members
  • 2 513 messages
I've heard those rumors too. I do hope their true, because I sympathize with creators freedom, but I really want the ending changed, but I only want it done if they want it done.

#5
ncknck

ncknck
  • Members
  • 1 216 messages

Link with lots of unfounded speculations wrote...

The final parts of Mass Effect 3 were meant to leave fans feeling happy

Stopped reading there.

Modifié par ncknck, 19 mars 2012 - 03:50 .


#6
Metalrocks

Metalrocks
  • Members
  • 421 messages
leaked ending or not, they shoulnd have changed it. not every single one checked out the leaks. i dint.

#7
ringdrossel

ringdrossel
  • Members
  • 41 messages
out of curiosity - was the leaked ending better then the released one?

#8
RVallant

RVallant
  • Members
  • 612 messages

F00lishG wrote...

...What? How could they have run out of time? We was told that ME3 was fully playable Christmas 2010. And then they delayed it 3 months from Christmas 2011...Why weren't the endings like the 5th thing they worked on. At first I was okay with the current endings. I'm not now.


I wouldn't believe what they say in press releases or otherwise. It's "better" pr for them to re-assure people nothing's being rushed, everything was complete.

Iirc they had a very short cycle to do the game in no? Two, three years? I forget. You can tell the game goes full-speed ahead in more ways than one post-Rannoch imho.

#9
Super.Sid

Super.Sid
  • Members
  • 594 messages
Not accurate enough, no where does it mention any word from any Bioware official but still it seems to be the logical conclusion

#10
spirosz

spirosz
  • Members
  • 16 356 messages

coles4971 wrote...

Well they rushed out the ending because some idiots leaked the story before release.

No way can Bioware take all the blame for this.


I still don't think that should of been a factor to change the ending. If people want to spoil themselves before a games release, then by all means, go for it, but there were a ton of people who did a media blackout on this game, so they would change an ending because a minority spoiled themselves? Doesn't make sense to me.

#11
Tigerman123

Tigerman123
  • Members
  • 646 messages
The endings contained in the leaked script and the final product are virtually identical..... They didn't change anything

#12
Gibb_Shepard

Gibb_Shepard
  • Members
  • 3 694 messages
That's bull. Th author has essentially taken one of Hudson's quotes and assumed that he meant they ran out of time. He doesn't provide any sources for this "breakthrough" information.

#13
Guest_Catch This Fade_*

Guest_Catch This Fade_*
  • Guests

coles4971 wrote...

Well they rushed out the ending because some idiots leaked the story before release.

No way can Bioware take all the blame for this.

Since BioWare is the one that felt the need to rush I don't think it'd be unexpected if someone were to blame them. Now that I think about it, I blame BioWare.

Modifié par jreezy, 19 mars 2012 - 03:51 .


#14
SkyPlus

SkyPlus
  • Members
  • 92 messages
Clearly EA was rushing them to meet a deadline

#15
Super.Sid

Super.Sid
  • Members
  • 594 messages

SkyPlus wrote...

Clearly EA was rushing them to meet a deadline


Yea they had to show sales figures for Q4 since it is the end of the year and knowing that it was the most anticipated game of the year, it would sell huge and cause a rise in stocks.

#16
Chris Priestly

Chris Priestly
  • Members
  • 7 259 messages
 Changed the title as it was misleading.

#17
The Confidence-Man

The Confidence-Man
  • Members
  • 35 messages
Gotta have multiplayer and kinect!

#18
Overule

Overule
  • Members
  • 843 messages
We're aware. And we're not amused.

#19
Midarenkov

Midarenkov
  • Members
  • 591 messages
Lots of speculations from everyone! :D

#20
ringdrossel

ringdrossel
  • Members
  • 41 messages

The Confidence-Man wrote...

Gotta have multiplayer and kinect!


SO TRUE. Why focus on what defines the game if there isn't even a proper ending? Let's throw in multiplayer and kinect since this makes up for any awful ending we choose.

Thanks Bioware.

#21
Edje Edgar

Edje Edgar
  • Members
  • 419 messages

Chris Priestly wrote...

 Changed the title as it was misleading.




That almost never happens around here.

Then again, making it blue probably makes it infinitely more interesting than that 'misleading' title ever could.

Modifié par Edje Edgar, 19 mars 2012 - 04:04 .


#22
Mighty_BOB_cnc

Mighty_BOB_cnc
  • Members
  • 694 messages

The Confidence-Man wrote...

Gotta have multiplayer and kinect!


Yeah those are SUPER important guyz! zomg, like, super cereal.

-edit- Also good morning Chris.  Hope you've got some good anti-anxiety meds. :lol:

Modifié par Mighty_BOB_cnc, 19 mars 2012 - 04:03 .


#23
natie

natie
  • Members
  • 77 messages

coles4971 wrote...

Well they rushed out the ending because some idiots leaked the story before release.

No way can Bioware take all the blame for this.


It doesn't make any sense. The endings didn't change much from the leaked script, if at all. The only things we didn't know from the script was (minor spoiler) -> who the "GUARDIAN" character was and what exactly happens to relays and Shepard in all of the outcomes. The leak has nothing to do with rushed ending.

If you're talking about the Dark Energy thing, it was a rumour from WAY before the leaked script. It was just a forum post with no proof whatsoever. They could just ignore it and move on (like many of us did).

Modifié par natie, 19 mars 2012 - 04:19 .


#24
Super.Sid

Super.Sid
  • Members
  • 594 messages
Bioware doesnt want to confirm or deny anything at this point.They just want to remain non commital and play along

Modifié par Super.Sid, 19 mars 2012 - 04:05 .


#25
LiquidLogic2020

LiquidLogic2020
  • Members
  • 402 messages
So what was the leaked ending then anyway? It can't have been worse than "speculation for everyone" and "jus liek de dun herp de derp matrix".