What's with this "No Closure" BS?
#126
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 02:10
#127
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 02:12
RegularX wrote...
SmokePants wrote...
The galaxy was not obliterated. Comprehend things first and THEN criticize.
The only mistake Bioware made was in overestimating its fanbase. If they had kept in mind how petty, reductive, and closed-minded they are, they might have done things differently.
Too late now.
You have no idea what happened to the galaxy, because it's never shown except for differently colored explosions. Maybe try comprehending that is exactly one of the things people are calling out here, that we're treated to some random and inexplicable scenes which only have anything marginal to do the rest of the game(s).
I DO have an idea of what happened. Educated guess. Informed opinion. Common sense. All I know is that I would be willing to put money on it.
For all you know, the Earth is left in ashes, there's an entire flotilla starving in space without a home, and Joker can't get busy with EDI because he left his can opener in the other Normandy.
For all you know, your pet is planning your murder.
I have no reason to believe the Earth is in ashes (unless that was my ending choice). I have no reason to believe the various fleets didn't make it home.
I have no reason to believe the galaxy got obliterated.
And you don't either. You are the ones who are clinging tenaciously to a ridiculous worst-case scenario to further fuel your rage over ambiguity. You don't have to believe that if you don't want to. It's a phenomena known as cutting off your nose to spite your face.
It doesn't matter if my interpretation of what happens pans out. It's just my working theory and theorys are meant to adapt to new information, which we will get.
But the most likely scenario is that you people are angry over nothing.
#128
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 02:12
#129
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 02:15
I have a lingering suspicion that people want to know what happened to their lovers and friends after they got stranded on some jungle planet where they'll probably be eaten by beasts and/or starve to death because of dietary requirements. Like, it is highly unlikely that both Garrus AND Joker could eat whatever grows on that planet. One of them starves to death. Etc.Hudathan wrote...
The only goal in the game is to stop the Reapers and prevent total annhilation of the advanced races. At the end of the game you stop the Reapers and prevent total annhilation of the advanced races. Lots of people got screwed along the way but you ended a cycle that organics have unable to fight back against for millions of years. Again, what else was the game about other than the ultimate goal of firing off the Crucible and hope we don't all die?
#130
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 02:17
It's a totally respectable ending.
#131
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 02:47
#132
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:08
Well following past established canon (arrival dlc), Every relay goes super nova and destroys most of the galaxy. If the explosions aren't dangerous why did it destroy the Normandy and maroon it on a planet?I DO have an idea of what happened. Educated guess. Informed opinion. Common sense. All I know is that I would be willing to put money on it.
FTL Travel will take centuries without a relay. You need a sense of scale with a galaxy they are massive. Without mass relays no one except possibly asari could see their home planet again. And that is assuming the fleet is impervious to the relay explosion, but then why wasn't the Normandy impervious to it as well? Normandy crashes in every explosion, common sense would dictate the same happens to the armada you brought to earth.I have no reason to believe the Earth is in ashes (unless that was my ending choice). I have no reason to believe the various fleets didn't make it home.
Look above, addressed that the explsoins were dangerous due to established canon.I have no reason to believe the galaxy got obliterated.
By all means explain why only the Normandy would crash but the fleets wouldn't. Then explain how the fleets would get home in a tiemframe where the survivors of the battle could see their homes. Then explain how war torn planets such as earth have the capability to sustain their populations after the Reapers obliterated them.And you don't either. You are the ones who are clinging tenaciously to a ridiculous worst-case scenario to further fuel your rage over ambiguity. You don't have to believe that if you don't want to. It's a phenomena known as cutting off your nose to spite your face.
The most likely scenario is that you don't have an understanding of the ME universe and can accept plot holes asBut the most likely scenario is that you people are angry over nothing.
Modifié par NReed106, 20 mars 2012 - 03:08 .
#133
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:10
Mafia_Steve wrote...
The story is fantastic, until the very end, where it seemingly makes all those story arcs all for naught. It feels as if the ME3 writers got indoctrinated by a reaper called, Nietzsche.
I was thinking more Kafka but you make a valid point.
#134
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:24
SmokePants wrote...
I DO have an idea of what happened. Educated guess. Informed opinion. Common sense. All I know is that I would be willing to put money on it.For all you know, your pet is planning your murder.For all you know, the Earth is left in ashes, there's an entire flotilla starving in space without a home, and Joker can't get busy with EDI because he left his can opener in the other Normandy.
I have no reason to believe the Earth is in ashes (unless that was my ending choice). I have no reason to believe the various fleets didn't make it home.
I have no reason to believe the galaxy got obliterated.
And you don't either. You are the ones who are clinging tenaciously to a ridiculous worst-case scenario to further fuel your rage over ambiguity. You don't have to believe that if you don't want to. It's a phenomena known as cutting off your nose to spite your face.
It doesn't matter if my interpretation of what happens pans out. It's just my working theory and theorys are meant to adapt to new information, which we will get.
But the most likely scenario is that you people are angry over nothing.
Actually there's lots of reasons to believe that Earth is in Ashes, that the relays destruction is catastrophic and that the flotilla is essentially marooned. And every bit of it is based on ingame canon and evidence provided by the story.
You have your intrepretation and that's fine. People want to believe that synthesis turned the whole galaxy into happy super beings all the way down to tree leaves - all the power to them. I found the whole concept just creepy as hell.
*Either* side of coin points to lazy writing, simple as that. You choose to believe that what happens in the void of vast amounts of plots points is all wonderful and good. But you arrived there not because the ending was well told, but that's what you chose to believe.
#135
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:27
#136
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:27
#137
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:28
#138
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:29
Bloody trolls..
#139
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:32
#140
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:33
It's entirely possible for there to be an ending that doesn't take the DA:O epilogue approach and yet it still satisfying. It would involve giving the game a complete third act.
#141
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:35
[*]Resolving the Quarian/Geth war, (if you talk to Tali afterwards you'll find full closure on that story arch)
[*]Curing the Genophage (or leaving it unchecked, Talking to Wrex/Wreav on Earth afterwards ties up that story)
[*]Setting closure to Jack's storyline as a military teacher finding the closest thing she has to a family.
[*]Finding resolve or annialation of the Racini Queen, be it legit or artificial
[*]Jacob finally finding the peace to start a family.
[*]So how do we know the peace will be kept, exactly?[*]How do we know the Krogan won't rise up?
- What happened to the students?[*]If we let the queen live, will she rise up again?[*]How do we know Jacob found the life he wanted, and that the Reapers didn't ruin this dream?
#142
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:36
#143
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:37
And the events you gave example of ? They are sub-plots being came-to-head...it is the Galaxy's Loyalty missions. The closure we are talking about is what happened after that sequence of scenes with made little sense ? All those ''closures'' as you call it , was for nothing ? What was the point of those ?
I made the Loyalty mission example because it was basicly following the same pattern of ME2 but instead of gathering crew members, you were gathering galactic armies on a larger scale. So that means you have to ''resolve '' their situation but that is by no means to give you a closure until Reapers are defeated since as we saw in the current endings, nothing you did made sense and completely over-written.
Soo why not just give us the ''Galactic Suicide mission'' on par with ME2 ending where those ''Galactic Loyalty missions'' would actually MEAN something. That was the point of no closure....
Everything you did for those people, it didn't matter in the end. Relays gone, galaxy screwed. Citadel is gone , Earth is devastated, Normandy stranded.....
It gave us more questions than answers and if this is THE Ending you came up with for a trilogy....then you are doing something seriously wrong.
#144
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:39
Yeah, closure, you wouldn't happen to be a fan of M. Night, would you?
#145
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:42
Hudathan wrote...
Stop trying, just let people who need something to complain about have theirs.
I've done precious little complaining about anything in the series. This ending stunk, that's why I have criticised it, not because I have some character flaw that makes me feel a need to complain.
Why can't people accept that people will disagree for legitimate reasons?
#146
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 03:44
#147
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 04:33
#148
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:36
Hudathan wrote...
The only goal in the game is to stop the Reapers and prevent total annhilation of the advanced races. At the end of the game you stop the Reapers and prevent total annhilation of the advanced races. Lots of people got screwed along the way but you ended a cycle that organics have unable to fight back against for millions of years. Again, what else was the game about other than the ultimate goal of firing off the Crucible and hope we don't all die?LolaLei wrote...
The endings undo all the closure we worked so hard to achieve through the whole game.
Saying the only Goal of this game was to defeat the Reapers is like saying the only goal of Skyrim is to defeat Alduin. It is a part of the main story yes... but if that was it, that game would not be nearly as popular as it is.
Also, if the only goal was to defeat the Reapers... People wouldn't have spent 100s of hours doing all of the side quests in all of the games. That comment just misses the whole point of the RPG genre completely.
#149
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:37
sedrikhcain wrote...
Hudathan wrote...
Stop trying, just let people who need something to complain about have theirs.
I've done precious little complaining about anything in the series. This ending stunk, that's why I have criticised it, not because I have some character flaw that makes me feel a need to complain.
Why can't people accept that people will disagree for legitimate reasons?
Because that would be to logical and easy.
#150
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:42





Retour en haut






