Golden Owl wrote...
Aside from the ending and MP enforcement to get the EMS up, I feel ME3 is a beautiful game...epic... But if there is one thing that really bugs me throughout the game itself, it's the over inclusion of Liara, I just felt dogged by her...she has the lions share of dialogs, lions share of enforced missions, lions share of essentiality, lions share of screen and Normandy time...I just felt she was on Sheps heels way too much with inclusion and cut scenes....Does anyone else feel this way?
Though everyone has there own Opinion - I personally didn't like ME3 compared to ME1,2. I simply thought most of the character development was pathetic. Liara is given so much emphasis throughout the entire ME series. And in ME3, the rest of the characters are "neglected"
I didn't have Liara as a LI, but had Miranda, Ash, and Subject Zer0 in my seperate playthroughs. In ME3 none except Ash was recruitable. I couldn't take Miranda on any mission. I couldn't bring Subject Zer0 on any missions. I didn't recruit Ash till middle of the game (and the way they made Ash in ME3 was awful. Her character defintely changed) she's not fun, but whines and almost you didn't want to bring her back on the Normandy.
For those who wanted Kelly Chambers back as a romancable character........good luck with that.
Though I'm not a fan of Liara. I was a fan of Zaeed, Wrex/Wreav/Grunt the Krogans are awesome (yes even Wreav)
Instead of having any of these characters (they were all cameos how pathetic is that) I instead get some new character name Vega or the prothean. Though they cool characters --- can't replace Grunt, Zaeed, Wrex/Wreav
so yeah, Liara was in the game from beginning.
And the rest cameos. Is that lazy-poor-writing? I think so. I also see the ME3 as a whole as "rushed"
I would gladly have waited another year if all these could have been avoided