Aller au contenu

Photo

Psychic Impulses - what I do after a few times through


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
2834 réponses à ce sujet

#2126
sagevallant

sagevallant
  • Members
  • 853 messages

Sialater wrote...

Talking to a friend of mine via AIM:

Friend: So, I found out last night that my services to Ferelden are no longer needed
Me: Oh?
Friend: yeah
Me: What'd you do?
Friend: Superman just crash landed. I figure he can take care of it


It's not over yet, we've got to buy him about fifteen years until he becomes Superboy. Who is actually pretty whiny, maybe we should give him twenty years.

...imagine if he got turned into a Darkspawn... >_<

#2127
Sialater

Sialater
  • Members
  • 12 600 messages
Well, that archdemon would be a bit easier to defeat. Just show it Starfang.

#2128
mousestalker

mousestalker
  • Members
  • 16 945 messages

sagevallant wrote...


It's not over yet, we've got to buy him about fifteen years until he becomes Superboy. Who is actually pretty whiny, maybe we should give him twenty years.

...imagine if he got turned into a Darkspawn... >_<


"All of our kryptonite is lyrium enhanced. (hee hee) I worked the ore my-myself."

#2129
Recidiva

Recidiva
  • Members
  • 1 846 messages

mousestalker wrote...

OMG! So jealous here....

Enjoy!


He...was...AWESOME!  *code monkey dance*

#2130
Fangirl17

Fangirl17
  • Members
  • 1 046 messages

Seallyn wrote...

Something I found on GreyWarden.com. Holy Sh** it's awesome!




THAT WAS EPIC.

#2131
sagevallant

sagevallant
  • Members
  • 853 messages

Fangirl17 wrote...

Seallyn wrote...

Something I found on GreyWarden.com. Holy Sh** it's awesome!


THAT WAS EPIC.


Duncanspawn... the beards alone could crush us all! >_<

#2132
Seallyn

Seallyn
  • Members
  • 242 messages

sagevallant wrote...

Fangirl17 wrote...

Seallyn wrote...

Something I found on GreyWarden.com. Holy Sh** it's awesome!


THAT WAS EPIC.


Duncanspawn... the beards alone could crush us all! >_<


The last slap in the 'Slap the Sh*t out of Morigan' sequence was my favorite. 

#2133
Xandurpein

Xandurpein
  • Members
  • 3 045 messages

Recidiva wrote...

It's funny how people consider certain things to be personality overlays and certain things to be true personality


I think every person develops their own strategy for communication and getting attention. This is not something we are usually even aware of, although we can learn to understand it with enough self-awareness. We ultimatly all need approval from people around us in some form and we form our communication style, depending on what feedback we get.

Some kids become the "class clown" because that is a strategy thet, at least in the short term, gives them most positive attention. Others become shy and silent, because it seems to get them less negative attention. Whatever the reason is, we adopt roles that may not really be your "true self", just a mask you put on, but still something that you and those around you come to accept as part of your personality.

this is why people who have matured and changed their personality of the years, may still unconcioulsly slip into an older role, when they return to a old familiar situation. You can be one person with your normal friends and still go back into an older role with your parents or the high school reunion. Or why a man can be one person with his wife and different with his old buddies.

In some situations we can get caught in destructive patterns, because we seek approval from destructive people, then we need to change, and sometimes we need to teach ourselves to not get stuck in roles we feel constrain us, but we also need to accept that we are sometimes different persons in different situations and there is really nothing wrong with that.

Ultimately we are all like diamonds. From whatever angle we watch each other, there are always more facets on the other side, and our true self is the diamond, not just one facet.

#2134
Recidiva

Recidiva
  • Members
  • 1 846 messages

Xandurpein wrote...

I think every person develops their own strategy for communication and getting attention. This is not something we are usually even aware of, although we can learn to understand it with enough self-awareness. We ultimatly all need approval from people around us in some form and we form our communication style, depending on what feedback we get.

Some kids become the "class clown" because that is a strategy thet, at least in the short term, gives them most positive attention. Others become shy and silent, because it seems to get them less negative attention. Whatever the reason is, we adopt roles that may not really be your "true self", just a mask you put on, but still something that you and those around you come to accept as part of your personality.

this is why people who have matured and changed their personality of the years, may still unconcioulsly slip into an older role, when they return to a old familiar situation. You can be one person with your normal friends and still go back into an older role with your parents or the high school reunion. Or why a man can be one person with his wife and different with his old buddies.

In some situations we can get caught in destructive patterns, because we seek approval from destructive people, then we need to change, and sometimes we need to teach ourselves to not get stuck in roles we feel constrain us, but we also need to accept that we are sometimes different persons in different situations and there is really nothing wrong with that.

Ultimately we are all like diamonds. From whatever angle we watch each other, there are always more facets on the other side, and our true self is the diamond, not just one facet.


Absolutely I get that, but I find that the reality is a great deal more nuanced than Psych 101 makes it, and it's applied to people in the same way astrology gets applied - valid or not, you're the middle child, thus you MUST be this way.  Same way as you "must" be a certain way if you're a Scorpio.

So although there can be many strategies and reasons and purposes for incorporating humor, or mistrust or stoicism, or any other personality trait, they're often treated like they always mean one specific thing.

This isn't a commentary on psychological theory so much as the inconsistent and incomplete way it's applied. 
For me those theories have become cliche and overused as some sort of shorthand to explain people.  I think it's abused particularly in fiction.  When characters are constructed according to some psychological theory, it tends to rob the individual character of having a real life.  That is what makes a one-dimensional stereotypical character.  It's more realistic to take 47 traits and then make them compete for personality face time, and that's complicated enough, in real people it's hundreds if not thousands of traits.

Applied to real people, it tries to reduce the individual to a set response to certain stimulus, and I find that to be unfair to individuality and how very, very complicated people are.

I find this to be a fallacy about psychology the way I see medical fallacies.  "You have a runny nose and that means you have a cold or flu."  But what if that runny nose is leaking cerebrospinal fluid? 

Medically and psychologically, people are a great deal more unique than they're given credit.  And that results in people thinking they know the answers "You use humor to deflect, grow up." or "You have a cold, take two aspirin and try to reduce your stress level."  Both are equally ignorant and destructive diagnoses in a real person to whom they do not apply.

#2135
Xandurpein

Xandurpein
  • Members
  • 3 045 messages

Recidiva wrote...

Medically and psychologically, people are a great deal more unique than they're given credit.  And that results in people thinking they know the answers "You use humor to deflect, grow up." or "You have a cold, take two aspirin and try to reduce your stress level."  Both are equally ignorant and destructive diagnoses in a real person to whom they do not apply.


I get that. I didn't mean to make it sound like psych 101. And I vcertainly do not mean to imply that everyone is just stimuli, far from. What i meant is that I belive that what personality we choose display is a two-way communication. It's a result of what I put into it and what people around me put into it. We are all affected by people around us, but not everyone reacts the same in the same situation. I choose how to react to you and you choose how to react to me, that exchange of free wills will eventually congeal into a relationship in wich we both will tend to assume different roles, out of habit if nothing else.

/Edit. Did that make any sense to you? It is my own thinking, not out of any text book. I never studied psychology. ;)

Modifié par Xandurpein, 15 janvier 2010 - 12:53 .


#2136
Recidiva

Recidiva
  • Members
  • 1 846 messages

Xandurpein wrote...

I get that. I didn't mean to make it sound like psych 101. And I vcertainly do not mean to imply that everyone is just stimuli, far from. What i meant is that I belive that what personality we choose display is a two-way communication. It's a result of what I put into it and what people around me put into it. We are all affected by people around us, but not everyone reacts the same in the same situation. I choose how to react to you and you choose how to react to me, that exchange of free wills will eventually congeal into a relationship in wich we both will tend to assume different roles, out of habit if nothing else.

/Edit. Did that make any sense to you? It is my own thinking, not out of any text book. I never studied psychology. ;)


No, you didn't sound like psych 101, I was just elaborating :)

Yes, it made perfect sense. 

Just fleshing out my viewpoint more clearly (I hope!).

I'm not sure we choose our real personalities.  I think we can choose an overlay, but that doesn't always do as good of a job of "masking" traits we dislike as folks would like to think.

#2137
Xandurpein

Xandurpein
  • Members
  • 3 045 messages

Recidiva wrote...

Xandurpein wrote...

I get that. I didn't mean to make it sound like psych 101. And I vcertainly do not mean to imply that everyone is just stimuli, far from. What i meant is that I belive that what personality we choose display is a two-way communication. It's a result of what I put into it and what people around me put into it. We are all affected by people around us, but not everyone reacts the same in the same situation. I choose how to react to you and you choose how to react to me, that exchange of free wills will eventually congeal into a relationship in wich we both will tend to assume different roles, out of habit if nothing else.

/Edit. Did that make any sense to you? It is my own thinking, not out of any text book. I never studied psychology. ;)


No, you didn't sound like psych 101, I was just elaborating :)

Yes, it made perfect sense. 

Just fleshing out my viewpoint more clearly (I hope!).

I'm not sure we choose our real personalities.  I think we can choose an overlay, but that doesn't always do as good of a job of "masking" traits we dislike as folks would like to think.


You are clear. And I don't think that my belief is that those "inner qualities" that is your core self cannot be masked as well as many people want to belive either. It's more that they compliment each other. You can choose the "mask" of a comedian in some situations, but not in others, but neither says anything about your beliefs and morals. How you communicate (jokes, argumentative, silent) and what you communicate (ideas, beliefs and thoughts) are two different things. I belive as you that what you communicate eventually will shine through no matter how you try to mask it.

#2138
Recidiva

Recidiva
  • Members
  • 1 846 messages

Xandurpein wrote...

You are clear. And I don't think that my belief is that those "inner qualities" that is your core self cannot be masked as well as many people want to belive either. It's more that they compliment each other. You can choose the "mask" of a comedian in some situations, but not in others, but neither says anything about your beliefs and morals. How you communicate (jokes, argumentative, silent) and what you communicate (ideas, beliefs and thoughts) are two different things. I belive as you that what you communicate eventually will shine through no matter how you try to mask it.


Right, I think the complementary style is the best.  To choose by will your communication style to compensate for something that you know is "the real you" by experience, rather than choose to hide it.

For me, I know I'm a very good liar and manipulator.  I can't really help that.  Due to the way my brain works, it just sort of "pops into my head" what would be the thing another person most wants to hear.  Whether or not that's moral or reasonable or whatever, I know my brain gets it and can't NOT get it.

As a result, to compensate for that tendency, I will tell people outright that I am a very good liar and manipulator.  That it's very likely I'll never be caught, as I haven't been yet.  And I spent large swaths of my younger life lying and stealing and cheating.  I will also say that I WILL lie during times of stress and crisis, say if someone's life is in danger.   I also know I can beat a polygraph and don't have many of the "reads" or outward signs of conflict that other people have when they lie.

To avoid manipulation, I'll confess what I'm thinking and be up front about it.  I won't tell someone I will never lie to them.  Because I know I've actually benefitted other people, to the point of saving someone's life when they're in danger, by lying to them.  I've also saved my own life a few times due to subterfuge and making it look seamlessly real.

People get to choose whether or not they want to hang around that and trust that my instincts ultimately won't do them any harm if they don't try to do any harm.

So I keep my advantages in a survival sense, but I point them out to people and say that I'm also really good at camouflage.  "Look, sharp teeth, sharp claws, sharp wits, weird intuition that has never steered me wrong in a crisis.  Don't mess around with them and not a problem.  Day to day it'll look like I don't have them at all, don't be fooled."

Modifié par Recidiva, 15 janvier 2010 - 02:46 .


#2139
Ilvra

Ilvra
  • Members
  • 92 messages

Recidiva wrote...

For me, I know I'm a very good liar and manipulator.  I can't really help that.  Due to the way my brain works, it just sort of "pops into my head" what would be the thing another person most wants to hear.  Whether or not that's moral or reasonable or whatever, I know my brain gets it and can't NOT get it.

As a result, to compensate for that tendency, I will tell people outright that I am a very good liar and manipulator.  That it's very likely I'll never be caught, as I haven't been yet.  And I spent large swaths of my younger life lying and stealing and cheating.  I will also say that I WILL lie during times of stress and crisis, say if someone's life is in danger.   I also know I can beat a polygraph and don't have many of the "reads" or outward signs of conflict that other people have when they lie.

To avoid manipulation, I'll confess what I'm thinking and be up front about it.  I won't tell someone I will never lie to them.  Because I know I've actually benefitted other people, to the point of saving someone's life when they're in danger, by lying to them.  I've also saved my own life a few times due to subterfuge and making it look seamlessly real.

People get to choose whether or not they want to hang around that and trust that my instincts ultimately won't do them any harm if they don't try to do any harm.

So I keep my advantages in a survival sense, but I point them out to people and say that I'm also really good at camouflage.  "Look, sharp teeth, sharp claws, sharp wits, weird intuition that has never steered me wrong in a crisis.  Don't mess around with them and not a problem.  Day to day it'll look like I don't have them at all, don't be fooled."


I have the same odd "talent" of quickly reading people and knowing exactly what they want to hear.  I'm pretty sure I know why and how I developed it. Let's just say "survival mechanism" and let it go at that.  It only works in person, by the way. I have no idea what anybody here wants, which is both refreshing and scary, so I lurk more than post.

My compensatory technique is quite different from yours. Rather than just go with it, I tend to step back from myself and get all Vulcan trying to logically and emotionlessly determine whether what they want to hear is also what I want to say.  It introduces inappropriate pauses into my conversations, so people sometimes think I'm either weird or just slow. Or they think I'm trying to figure out what they want to hear, when in fact, I knew that before they finished talking more often than not.  What I don't know, and need a moment to figure out, is what I want.

On the flip side, I can be a viper. If you can push me to the point where what I want is to lash out at you, guess what? I know what you want to hear, and it's not that far to knowing what you don't want to hear. I go straight for the jugular and almost always hit my target. I've learned to control that impulse reasonably well, but it was hard-earned, and I'm not the only one who paid the cost.

#2140
AlainNagel

AlainNagel
  • Members
  • 111 messages
Wow this is an excellent way of drive agro about the game away. My attempt here:

(Just after a fight with Morrigan shapeshifted into a spider)
Me: Erm...Morrigan? Why am I bleeding like I have bloodmage capabilities? This time I'm a warrior.
Morrigan: (mumbles something about broken AI attack routines)
Me: Wynne is healing me but she'll be a lyrium-junkie again once this dungeon is over.
Wynne: Pleeeaaaase.... Stop bleeding... (chugs down another potion)
Alistair (from far away behind the group): Helloooo! Did we win? I hope we won. Yeah, winning is good.
Rest of the group: Shut up you!
Alistair: But I've been alone here for the last three restarts.
Me: You're there in case we get attacked from behind.
Alistair: But we've been through this part on three different versions of you and never had that happen.
Me: But this time we have you in Cailen's armour and it's all shiny so now we might.
Shale (from camp): It got something shiny but didn't give it to me?
Me (shout): Don't make me change youre name to Marvin, okay? I'll find that mod someday.
Morrigan: Why did we only find Cailin but not Duncan?
Me: ....?
Morrigan: What?
Me: Why are you suddenly aware of the story other then the bits that have to do with you? And you've never even seen him so how would you know about him?
Morrigan disapproves -25
Me: And you knock that off 'Tis-pedobear!
Wynne chocks on potions..
Me (dies): Oooo ssshhhiiiiiii...

Reload..

Me (reaching for respec potion): [Persuade] Here Morrigan, let's deactivate that pesky ability for something useable for once. I think I'll make you a nice healer as a replacement for Wynne.
Morrigan (cries): But all my years of evil traing in the Wilds? All for nothing!
Wynne (swaying a bit): This old mage is somehow still tasting lyrium vomit.
Me:[threaten] If I see any of you guys again in Awakenings you're all fair game, I swear! You guys are sucky companions!
Alistair (mumbles to the others): Notice that he's much nicer when he is a female character? Hey why am I on fire?
Me (from a distance blowing on my fingers): Ooops! That was so worth the potions and poultices. I should do friendly fire more often.

Modifié par AlainNagel, 15 janvier 2010 - 05:58 .


#2141
Zachriel

Zachriel
  • Members
  • 362 messages
Well, I actually have studied psychology at least a little bit, and it's not as simple as you make it sound. Way back in the old days, when it was a new science, the general belief was that all behavior was a response to a physical stimulus. Back then, psychology was pretty barbaric.



The field has grown considerably over the decades. Now, it's more about observing human behavior and looking for discernable patterns. It's kind of a "best fit" approach. Certain behavioral patterns have been observed (like the 16 desribed in the Biggs-Myers test), and although the human psyche is far to complex to say that an indiviual just IS one of those types and WILL behave exactly as predicted, you can say that an individual's behavior fits pretty well with one of those types. Based on that, you can then predict with some degree of certaintly what how they'll react and what they'll do. That's just the starting point, though. To really understand what makes a person tick, you have to delve deeper. Find out where they're from, what they've been through, what events in their life were the most traumatic or left the greatest impression, etc. That's what a good pyschologist will do.



Then there's the field of neruobiology, the study of the brain and how it works. There have been a lot of breakthroughs in this field in the last couple of decades that I find to be truly fascinating. I read about one just a few months ago, in fact. It seems that human memory is far more malleable than we once believed. Every time we recall a memory it becomes malleable and can be changed before it gets "put away" and stored again. From a biological/evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense. It allows us to add information to memory and expand our knowledge. But, there are other consequences as well. Since memory can be changed when it is recalled, embelishments added to actuall memory can be written into the memory itself to the point that we actually believe that's how it really happened.



The guy who discovered this was working with trauma victims. Rape victims, veterans suffering from PTSD, etc. He was looking for a way to help them cope with their experiences. By studying the physical processes going on in the brain during recollection, he learned how to intefere with the recollection and alteration of memory. He's developed a drug that, when injected while a victim recalls a traumatic memory, can sever the link between the memory and the emotion associated with it. Taking it a step further, another guy found a drug that's even more powerful. Inject it while a person recalls a memory, and BAM! The memory is gone. Erased from their mind as though it never happened. He even found a third drug that can wipe out whole categories of memory. Whether or not these effects are permanent remains to be seen.



When I first read about this, I thought it was pretty scary. There is extreme potential for abuse here. On the other hand, the trauma victims who volunteered for the study expressed tremendous gratitude.



Anyway, just wanted to make sure the psychologists and neurobiologists don't get taken for granted. The study of the human mind has come a long, long way.

#2142
Recidiva

Recidiva
  • Members
  • 1 846 messages

Zachriel wrote...

Well, I actually have studied psychology at least a little bit, and it's not as simple as you make it sound. Way back in the old days, when it was a new science, the general belief was that all behavior was a response to a physical stimulus. Back then, psychology was pretty barbaric.

The field has grown considerably over the decades. Now, it's more about observing human behavior and looking for discernable patterns. It's kind of a "best fit" approach. Certain behavioral patterns have been observed (like the 16 desribed in the Biggs-Myers test), and although the human psyche is far to complex to say that an indiviual just IS one of those types and WILL behave exactly as predicted, you can say that an individual's behavior fits pretty well with one of those types. Based on that, you can then predict with some degree of certaintly what how they'll react and what they'll do. That's just the starting point, though. To really understand what makes a person tick, you have to delve deeper. Find out where they're from, what they've been through, what events in their life were the most traumatic or left the greatest impression, etc. That's what a good pyschologist will do.

Then there's the field of neruobiology, the study of the brain and how it works. There have been a lot of breakthroughs in this field in the last couple of decades that I find to be truly fascinating. I read about one just a few months ago, in fact. It seems that human memory is far more malleable than we once believed. Every time we recall a memory it becomes malleable and can be changed before it gets "put away" and stored again. From a biological/evolutionary standpoint, it makes perfect sense. It allows us to add information to memory and expand our knowledge. But, there are other consequences as well. Since memory can be changed when it is recalled, embelishments added to actuall memory can be written into the memory itself to the point that we actually believe that's how it really happened.

The guy who discovered this was working with trauma victims. Rape victims, veterans suffering from PTSD, etc. He was looking for a way to help them cope with their experiences. By studying the physical processes going on in the brain during recollection, he learned how to intefere with the recollection and alteration of memory. He's developed a drug that, when injected while a victim recalls a traumatic memory, can sever the link between the memory and the emotion associated with it. Taking it a step further, another guy found a drug that's even more powerful. Inject it while a person recalls a memory, and BAM! The memory is gone. Erased from their mind as though it never happened. He even found a third drug that can wipe out whole categories of memory. Whether or not these effects are permanent remains to be seen.

When I first read about this, I thought it was pretty scary. There is extreme potential for abuse here. On the other hand, the trauma victims who volunteered for the study expressed tremendous gratitude.

Anyway, just wanted to make sure the psychologists and neurobiologists don't get taken for granted. The study of the human mind has come a long, long way.


Oh, absolutely.  I am not saying how it doesn't work.  I'm saying it's misapplied routinely.  Same with medicine.  The unfortunate fact is that the application of "when you hear hoofbeats, think horses and not zebras" is a disservice to zebras.  Think horses, zebras and anything else you've discovered with hooves, and then be prepared to find a new breed of hooved something if necessary.

Unfortunately clinical psychology and clinical medicine lend themselves to a particular lazy pattern.  In medicine, you can say a person is "stressed" or is "acting out" and for some reason, stress and acting out are responsible for a ridiculous number of symptoms that are otherwise not addressed.  So it's the go-to excuse.  In psychology, it's the catch-all concept of "crazy."

Once medicine has decided that "something is in their head", the case is referred to psych.  There's no medical help available to someone who has gained that classification, unless someone who actually really cares, looks a bit further or is a specialist in the symptom constellation and notices a real pattern another doctor missed.

Once psych has determined they're crazy, then the only solution is...medicate, medicate, medicate.  Hopefully until they stop noticing or reporting symptoms.

So this isn't about the really amazing development of classifications of personality traits or medical knowledge.

It's like saying that antibiotics are really amazing things, but the abuse and misuse of them has its own set of problems that goes with it.

Modifié par Recidiva, 15 janvier 2010 - 06:20 .


#2143
Zachriel

Zachriel
  • Members
  • 362 messages
Oh, I see what you're saying. I actually work for a medical software company, so I've seen first hand how in a lot of hospitals the practice of medicine has become more about making money and less about caring for patients. I have also seen some really good hospitals that do take great care of their patients. Most of the really good ones are non profit organizations. With profit taken out of the equation, they're free to take all the time they need to give patients the care they deserve.

#2144
Recidiva

Recidiva
  • Members
  • 1 846 messages

Zachriel wrote...

Oh, I see what you're saying. I actually work for a medical software company, so I've seen first hand how in a lot of hospitals the practice of medicine has become more about making money and less about caring for patients. I have also seen some really good hospitals that do take great care of their patients. Most of the really good ones are non profit organizations. With profit taken out of the equation, they're free to take all the time they need to give patients the care they deserve.


Yeah.  I review medical files for emergency rooms and clinics (medical and psych) across the country.

It's an education.

#2145
nyxocity

nyxocity
  • Members
  • 636 messages
After the fight with Marjoline...



Me: Hey. You guys notice anything strange?

Sten: Strange?

Me: They're ALL headless. Every single body in the room. No heads.

Sten: That is not strange. That is as it should be.

Me: Okay. Anybody else? Because I think that's REALLY fricking AWESOME!

Alistair: Darn. I broke a nail.

Leliana: You think this... is awesome?

Me: In a world where Morrigan and Sten love me more than you two? I call this a win.


#2146
Recidiva

Recidiva
  • Members
  • 1 846 messages
still...don't...have...DLC...



hope...fading...



Did it actually get released for PC? I keep trying to check to see if I can download it and nada.

#2147
Herr Uhl

Herr Uhl
  • Members
  • 13 465 messages
Nothing as of yet.

#2148
Recidiva

Recidiva
  • Members
  • 1 846 messages

Herr Uhl wrote...

Nothing as of yet.


Okay.  I'll cease being paranoid.

All I know is that my character information is also supposed to be updated within a few hours...and that doesn't happen either.  I'm several profile pictures behind.

Thanks! 

#2149
mousestalker

mousestalker
  • Members
  • 16 945 messages
Has there been any official announcement?

#2150
Seallyn

Seallyn
  • Members
  • 242 messages
That's a negatory. :(



http://greywardens.c...stagar-release/