5 réponses à ce sujet

[rolson00]

Endings play out, BUT, you then take control of anderson and then have to go and save shepard and activate the citidel ( this plays into indoc theory) and if your shep didn't break free of reapers then anderson has to get edi to help him enter sheps mind virtically and destroy reapers hold on shep, and if you did break free then your sheps good side represested as anderson with your shep as squade mate.
what do you think be brutal, no favours

Edit: came up with this idea because anderson has a fatherly relesionship with shepard

Modifié par rolson00, 20 mars 2012 - 10:51 .

[Ravax]

I honestly think the ending should be anything, just not the current endinG (singular)...

This guy made an amazing ending: https://www.facebook...150599217676616

[Dockerr]

Having Anderson come and bail out the heroes failure at the minute seems kinda wrong. Definitely like the idea of playing Anderson looking for shepherd in the rubble though.

If you're transferring the players control; why not have them play as all sorts of squad mates to activate the catalyst? Kinda like a "Shepard has fallen so we must carry him" thing. Fits with ME themes too

[CRISIS1717]

No to indoctrination.

[Mastermadskills]

What do I think?

I think we deserve an epic battle with Elcor running around killing things with rockets and machine guns strapped to their backs with ships blowing the crap out of reapers with Thanix Cannons while regimens of Krogan charge into reaper forces and generally PWN **** up.

THAT is what I expected to see.

I was very, VERY dissapointed.

[rolson00]

Dockerr wrote...

Having Anderson come and bail out the heroes failure at the minute seems kinda wrong. Definitely like the idea of playing Anderson looking for shepherd in the rubble though.

If you're transferring the players control; why not have them play as all sorts of squad mates to activate the catalyst? Kinda like a "Shepard has fallen so we must carry him" thing. Fits with ME themes too

yes thats a better idea