Aller au contenu

Photo

The Indoctrination theory is false and stupid. Why?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
384 réponses à ce sujet

#101
ULS 980

ULS 980
  • Members
  • 77 messages

Sunnyhat1 wrote...

Holiday wrote...

 Do you remember the Prothean VI on Thessia that Kai Leng took to the Cerberus station? If you do, then you'd also remember that it was able to discern between people who were indoctrinated and people who weren't. It stated that both the Illusive Man and Kai Leng were indeed indoctrinated, while at the same time, stated that Shepard wasn't indoctrinated. There you go. Indoctrination theory disproven.

What if shepperd wasn't indoctrinated at that point. Reapers could very well be able to apply indoctrination at varying strengths.

From my point of view shepperd wasn't indoctrinated until right before the ending. Harbinger tries to indoctrinate him as a last resort to hinder him from reaching the citadel. He does it "quick and dirty", wich isn't as perfect as the slow, long term version. And that's the only reason shepperd can break out of it by choosing destroy. He's not immune to it or anything.

My 2 cents.

Then you'd have to disregard all the "proof" beforehand.
No kid transporting around and somehow surviving Reaper blasts. No Prothean VI "Protocols have been overridden", I will comply. No growls.
Because at those points, Shepard hasn't started being indoctrinated, assuming I'm reading your post right.

It's more like that, if the indoctrination theory is true, the start of Shep's indoctrination was when he was knocked out during Arrival a few doors down from a massive Reaper Artifact.

Modifié par ULS 980, 20 mars 2012 - 04:52 .


#102
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

ElementL09 wrote...
Funny, if Prothean VI could actually sense Indocturnation, then why were the Protheans getting infiltrated by Indocturnated spies?  Can Indocturnation be so subtle that a VI couldn't detect?


You making an assumption that the VI that could detect indoctrination was common or even around at the time of the Prothean problem with sleeper agents. It seems to me that the VI and Prothean ruins on Thessia was not just a common one but the key to the Crucible.

I see alot people saying the theory is false and providing some evidence, but I don't see anyone actually making sense of the ending that we already got.  I would really like to see that.


Saying one ending is confusing doesn't mean than an alternative theory is then somehow right.

#103
Makatak

Makatak
  • Members
  • 381 messages

MassEffected555 wrote...

Casey Hudsons comment is really all the proof I need. 

And I ignore it because it's insane. 


Agreed. When the project lead's notes on the ending are revealed, it kind of speaks as to what they were planning. And nowhere does it talk about Shep being indoctrinated. But it did show that the ending was hastily cobbled together, and that makes it more prone to little plot holes. You know. Like the ones we found.

The other main reason to not buy in to indoctrination theory is because none of the Bioware writers have ever confirmed it. None. Zero. The only people who've ever suggested it or proposed it are fans. The people who believe it are basically saying that fanfiction = canon. And that is not, and never will be, the truth.

#104
Sunnyhat1

Sunnyhat1
  • Members
  • 168 messages

MassEffected555 wrote...

Sunnyhat1 wrote...

Holiday wrote...

 Do you remember the Prothean VI on Thessia that Kai Leng took to the Cerberus station? If you do, then you'd also remember that it was able to discern between people who were indoctrinated and people who weren't. It stated that both the Illusive Man and Kai Leng were indeed indoctrinated, while at the same time, stated that Shepard wasn't indoctrinated. There you go. Indoctrination theory disproven.

What if shepperd wasn'T indoctrinated at that point. Reapers could very well be able to apply indoctrination at varying strengths.
From my point of view shepperd wasn't indoctrinated until right before the ending. Harbinger tries to indoctrinate him as a last resort to hinder him from reaching the citadel. He does it "quick and dirty", wich isn't as perfect as the slow, long term version. And that's the only reason shepperd can break out of it by choosing destroy. He's not immune to it or anything.

My 2 cents.


OK fine. Let's roll with this.
Shepard gets indoctrinated at the blast.
Still with me? OK good.

Shepard is able to break free of the indocrtination. Sooooooooooo for how long? It is a FACT (according to ME) that Indoctrination is irreversable. Now since 2 major and powerful characters, actually 3 if you count arrival, were only able to break free of Indoc for about 2 minutes, except Project Rho Dr(cant ever remember her name) you propose that after Shep wakes up we need to complete the "real" ending in 2 minutes?

So Shep will save the day and then shoot himself in the face? I don't see anyone saying what happens next. 

SO what exactly happens after he RESISTS indoc? Once you are indoctrinated you are permantly so I guess Shep is screwed huh.

The whole protest is not about shepperd being alive or dead. MAny if not most expected shepperd to die ever since BW announced it will be shepperds last adventure. The point is the end makes no sense and doesnt tell you enough about the fate of your comrades and the rest of the galaxy.

Shepperd dying or not is really a minor issue here.

#105
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

Mcjon01 wrote...
How do you know it's the same growl?  It was mentioned in a book, nobody ever heard it.  And people like to point out the growling sound you hear when the boy disappears in the vent, while ignoring the fact that there's an actual Reaper right outside the building, stomping around doing Reaper things and making Reaper noises.


In-Game facts won't dilute nerd rage-induced theories.

#106
Guest_ConVito_*

Guest_ConVito_*
  • Guests

CavScout wrote...

ElementL09 wrote...
Funny, if Prothean VI could actually sense Indocturnation, then why were the Protheans getting infiltrated by Indocturnated spies?  Can Indocturnation be so subtle that a VI couldn't detect?


You making an assumption that the VI that could detect indoctrination was common or even around at the time of the Prothean problem with sleeper agents. It seems to me that the VI and Prothean ruins on Thessia was not just a common one but the key to the Crucible.

I see alot people saying the theory is false and providing some evidence, but I don't see anyone actually making sense of the ending that we already got.  I would really like to see that.


Saying one ending is confusing doesn't mean than an alternative theory is then somehow right.


So you're flat out saying you'd prefer to believe the less believable theory? Cool.

#107
ULS 980

ULS 980
  • Members
  • 77 messages

Makatak wrote...

MassEffected555 wrote...

Casey Hudsons comment is really all the proof I need. 

And I ignore it because it's insane. 


Agreed. When the project lead's notes on the ending are revealed, it kind of speaks as to what they were planning. And nowhere does it talk about Shep being indoctrinated. But it did show that the ending was hastily cobbled together, and that makes it more prone to little plot holes. You know. Like the ones we found.

The other main reason to not buy in to indoctrination theory is because none of the Bioware writers have ever confirmed it. None. Zero. The only people who've ever suggested it or proposed it are fans. The people who believe it are basically saying that fanfiction = canon. And that is not, and never will be, the truth.

They have, however, as recently as November played around with an ending where Shepard is indoctrinated. For all we know, everything leading up to that coulda supplemented that ending, but once they found out from a gameplay perspective that an indoctrinated Shepard wouldn't work, they had to scrap that ending (although not necessarily scrapping the story aspect of that ending) and cobble something else together.

So take that how you will.

I mean, I like the indoctrination theory, but I'm not going to sit here and assume that's what they had planned all along necessarily.
All I know is... the theory makes quite a bit of sense out of an otherwise terrible ending.
So like... whatever.:P

Modifié par ULS 980, 20 mars 2012 - 04:59 .


#108
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

ULS 980 wrote...

Mcjon01 wrote...

How do you know it's the same growl?  It was mentioned in a book, nobody ever heard it.  And people like to point out the growling sound you hear when the boy disappears in the vent, while ignoring the fact that there's an actual Reaper right outside the building, stomping around doing Reaper things and making Reaper noises.

Devil's advocate here, maybe, but you gotta admit, if the "growl" was a Reaper making Reaper noises outside, you have to admit the timing was pretty convenient. :U


Convenient for what? Play that mission again. There is Reaper "growling" going on constantly. Why would one, of many, instances of "growling" be convenient?

Isn't it more convenient to take a common place happening, the "growling", and claim to be evidence for some specific event?

#109
Sunnyhat1

Sunnyhat1
  • Members
  • 168 messages

ULS 980 wrote...

Sunnyhat1 wrote...

Holiday wrote...

 Do you remember the Prothean VI on Thessia that Kai Leng took to the Cerberus station? If you do, then you'd also remember that it was able to discern between people who were indoctrinated and people who weren't. It stated that both the Illusive Man and Kai Leng were indeed indoctrinated, while at the same time, stated that Shepard wasn't indoctrinated. There you go. Indoctrination theory disproven.

What if shepperd wasn't indoctrinated at that point. Reapers could very well be able to apply indoctrination at varying strengths.

From my point of view shepperd wasn't indoctrinated until right before the ending. Harbinger tries to indoctrinate him as a last resort to hinder him from reaching the citadel. He does it "quick and dirty", wich isn't as perfect as the slow, long term version. And that's the only reason shepperd can break out of it by choosing destroy. He's not immune to it or anything.

My 2 cents.

Then you'd have to disregard all the "proof" beforehand.
No kid transporting around and somehow surviving Reaper blasts. No Prothean VI "Protocols have been overridden", I will comply. No growls.
Because at those points, Shepard hasn't started being indoctrinated, assuming I'm reading your post right.

It's more like that, if the indoctrination theory is true, the start of Shep's indoctrination was when he was knocked out during Arrival a few doors down from a massive Reaper Artifact.

The very first indoc theory i saw, wich made the most sense to me only applies to the ending. All those "shepperd was indoced form the start" people are beyond my comprehension aswell. -.-''

#110
ULS 980

ULS 980
  • Members
  • 77 messages

Sunnyhat1 wrote...

ULS 980 wrote...

Sunnyhat1 wrote...

Holiday wrote...

 Do you remember the Prothean VI on Thessia that Kai Leng took to the Cerberus station? If you do, then you'd also remember that it was able to discern between people who were indoctrinated and people who weren't. It stated that both the Illusive Man and Kai Leng were indeed indoctrinated, while at the same time, stated that Shepard wasn't indoctrinated. There you go. Indoctrination theory disproven.

What if shepperd wasn't indoctrinated at that point. Reapers could very well be able to apply indoctrination at varying strengths.

From my point of view shepperd wasn't indoctrinated until right before the ending. Harbinger tries to indoctrinate him as a last resort to hinder him from reaching the citadel. He does it "quick and dirty", wich isn't as perfect as the slow, long term version. And that's the only reason shepperd can break out of it by choosing destroy. He's not immune to it or anything.

My 2 cents.

Then you'd have to disregard all the "proof" beforehand.
No kid transporting around and somehow surviving Reaper blasts. No Prothean VI "Protocols have been overridden", I will comply. No growls.
Because at those points, Shepard hasn't started being indoctrinated, assuming I'm reading your post right.

It's more like that, if the indoctrination theory is true, the start of Shep's indoctrination was when he was knocked out during Arrival a few doors down from a massive Reaper Artifact.

The very first indoc theory i saw, wich made the most sense to me only applies to the ending. All those "shepperd was indoced form the start" people are beyond my comprehension aswell. -.-''

I'm not saying Shepard was indoctrinated all along.
Just that the start of the indoctrination process happened LONG before the ending of ME3.
Remember, indoctrination is a drawn-out and subtle process.
Not one where someone flips a switch and Shepard's indoctrinated.

#111
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

ConVito wrote...

CavScout wrote...

ElementL09 wrote...
Funny, if Prothean VI could actually sense Indocturnation, then why were the Protheans getting infiltrated by Indocturnated spies?  Can Indocturnation be so subtle that a VI couldn't detect?


You making an assumption that the VI that could detect indoctrination was common or even around at the time of the Prothean problem with sleeper agents. It seems to me that the VI and Prothean ruins on Thessia was not just a common one but the key to the Crucible.

I see alot people saying the theory is false and providing some evidence, but I don't see anyone actually making sense of the ending that we already got.  I would really like to see that.


Saying one ending is confusing doesn't mean than an alternative theory is then somehow right.


So you're flat out saying you'd prefer to believe the less believable theory? Cool.


What theory are you refering to? The ending, as is, is simply the ending. No theory needed.

#112
joiushdfoubsndpovn

joiushdfoubsndpovn
  • Members
  • 91 messages

Holiday wrote...

 Do you remember the Prothean VI on Thessia that Kai Leng took to the Cerberus station? If you do, then you'd also remember that it was able to discern between people who were indoctrinated and people who weren't. It stated that both the Illusive Man and Kai Leng were indeed indoctrinated, while at the same time, stated that Shepard wasn't indoctrinated. There you go. Indoctrination theory disproven.


You are only indoctrinated once you start doing and believing on the side of the reapers.... everything up to that point is just weakening your resolve... so no, he is not indoctrinated at this point, what has your shep done for the reapers?  believing them to be right?  nothing, until the last scene...

#113
ULS 980

ULS 980
  • Members
  • 77 messages

CavScout wrote...

ULS 980 wrote...

Mcjon01 wrote...

How do you know it's the same growl?  It was mentioned in a book, nobody ever heard it.  And people like to point out the growling sound you hear when the boy disappears in the vent, while ignoring the fact that there's an actual Reaper right outside the building, stomping around doing Reaper things and making Reaper noises.

Devil's advocate here, maybe, but you gotta admit, if the "growl" was a Reaper making Reaper noises outside, you have to admit the timing was pretty convenient. :U


Convenient for what? Play that mission again. There is Reaper "growling" going on constantly. Why would one, of many, instances of "growling" be convenient?

Isn't it more convenient to take a common place happening, the "growling", and claim to be evidence for some specific event?

I'm just saying, if the "growl" isn't related to Shepard looking away from the kid that it's incredibly convenient that a Reaper just happened to growl outside at the exact moment that Shepard looked away from the boy.

I don't see how him looking away and the "growl" happening at the same time is a coincidence.
They have to be related.
NOW, whether or not the "growl" is related to indoctrination or not or whether it's more of a "gotcha" sound for the boy disappearing is a different story. I probably lean more towards it's a sound that signifies "WOAH, the boy's gone!" not the him resisting indoctrination.

Modifié par ULS 980, 20 mars 2012 - 05:09 .


#114
AxholeRose

AxholeRose
  • Members
  • 614 messages

CavScout wrote...

What theory are you refering to? The ending, as is, is simply the ending. No theory needed.


Explain the ending.

#115
DeathScepter

DeathScepter
  • Members
  • 5 527 messages
Indoctrination Theory, I do believe that Shepard started to be indoctrined near the end of Arrival and slowly went down hill from there. The more slowly you get indoctrined, the stronger it become.

#116
Bazedragon

Bazedragon
  • Members
  • 329 messages
*sigh*

ULS 980 wrote...

Couple things that have been bugging me.

Can we stop calling it an "indoctrination attempt". That implies the Reapers try indoctrination on an individual many times until they finally "crack them", like trying to throw cards into a hat. It also implies failure to indoctrinate someone, which isn't the case. Indoctrination always works (until, if the theory is correct, now). A closer analogy would be like putting a cup under a dripping faucet, where a full cup is full indoctrination.


Grayson in Mass Effect: Retribution novel. He was remarkably strong-willed, and managed to fight off the reapers a few times, untill Cerberus started dosing him with Red Sand.

Harbinger's not "attempting to indoctrinate Shepard". At the end, I think Harbinger just thought he killed Shepard. The only reason (again, if we subscribe to the theory) we get an "indoctrination sequence" is because at that point, Shepard's mental state is so battered that the indoctrination is finally starting to take real hold on his thoughts.
Doesn't really affect anything, I just think the phrase "indoctrination attempt" sounds incredibly stupid.


Explain the random 100 meter foward leap Shepard takes, from being a fair distance back from the beam to between the outer layer of pillars.

Secondly, Shepard's indoctrination (assuming the theory is correct) does not start when he's knocked out at the end. Indoctrination does not work that way. It's not a switch that Reapers flip and ten minutes later someone's indoctrinated. It's a subtle and drawn out process that doesn't draw attention to itself.
It more likely starts around the time he was knocked out on that base in Arrival, sitting a few rooms away from a massive Reaper artifact. Which explains part of why Shepard is second guessing himself and having nightmares and whatnot throughout ME3.


Indoctrination impacts different people differently. We also know that it is easier to perfom on people who are weakened mentally (Note - shep is quite close to a breakdown after Thessia), and when they have high levels of narcotics and/or Adrenaline in their system (I'd imagine the battle fighting the Destroyer, and the sprint to the beam would cause Shep to have a fair bit of adrenaline pumping about in there).

I Figured Arrival as the best time for it to start, too. Shep gets tricked into opening his mind to the Reapers. His strength-of-will and determination is probably all that stops him being indoctrinated by the start of ME3. The prothean VI's being able to only detect Reaper Tech implants would also be useful, but I thought they used some reaper tech in project Lazarus.

Lastly, the Prothean VI, as has already been stated, DOES recognize Shepard as indoctrinated (according to the theory), or at least partially so. Not on Thessia, but on TIM's base where Shepard asks him what the Catalyst is and the VI replies with "My security protocols have been overridden, I will comply", and the only time we've heard the VI use the phrase "Security protocol" is when he locked down because an indoctrinated presence showed up. It's not a statement or something just saying his protocols have been overridden. It's a direct reply to Shepard.
"I will comply" implies that had his protocols not been overridden, he would have refused to talk to Shepard.


Not necessarily - Kai Leng may have entered proximity for the VI to detect his indoctrination as Shepard asked the question, not to mention the next room contains a mostly-dead proto-reaper. Too many variables to say for certain it was Shepard.

#117
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

ULS 980 wrote...

CavScout wrote...
Convenient for what? Play that mission again. There is Reaper "growling" going on constantly. Why would one, of many, instances of "growling" be convenient?

Isn't it more convenient to take a common place happening, the "growling", and claim to be evidence for some specific event?

I'm just saying, if the "growl" isn't related to Shepard looking away from the kid that it's incredibly convenient that a Reaper just happened to growl outside at the exact moment that Shepard looked away from the boy.

I don't see how him looking away and the "growl" happening at the same time is a coincidence.
They have to be related.
NOW, whether or not the "growl" is related to indoctrination or not or whether it's more of a "gotcha" sound for the boy disappearing is a different story. I probably lean more towards it's a sound that signifies "WOAH, the boy's gone!" not the him resisting indoctrination.

It's no convenient for anything. Folks are inventing a reason that they be linked when there certainly doesn't have to be any. Reapers "growl". A Reaper outside that "growled" is not proof for a fan theory. Folks arguing that are doing so in a circular fashion. The boy is fake therefore the Reaper "growl" signifies indoctrination failure. The boy is fake because of the Reaper "growl".

If the boy is just a boy then the "growl" is nothing but a Reaper outside make the noises it's been making the entire mission.

#118
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

AxholeRose wrote...

CavScout wrote...

What theory are you refering to? The ending, as is, is simply the ending. No theory needed.


Explain the ending.


Support your theory.

#119
ULS 980

ULS 980
  • Members
  • 77 messages

Bazedragon wrote...

*sigh*

ULS 980 wrote...

Couple things that have been bugging me.

Can we stop calling it an "indoctrination attempt". That implies the Reapers try indoctrination on an individual many times until they finally "crack them", like trying to throw cards into a hat. It also implies failure to indoctrinate someone, which isn't the case. Indoctrination always works (until, if the theory is correct, now). A closer analogy would be like putting a cup under a dripping faucet, where a full cup is full indoctrination.


Grayson in Mass Effect: Retribution novel. He was remarkably strong-willed, and managed to fight off the reapers a few times, untill Cerberus started dosing him with Red Sand.

Harbinger's not "attempting to indoctrinate Shepard". At the end, I think Harbinger just thought he killed Shepard. The only reason (again, if we subscribe to the theory) we get an "indoctrination sequence" is because at that point, Shepard's mental state is so battered that the indoctrination is finally starting to take real hold on his thoughts.
Doesn't really affect anything, I just think the phrase "indoctrination attempt" sounds incredibly stupid.


Explain the random 100 meter foward leap Shepard takes, from being a fair distance back from the beam to between the outer layer of pillars.

Secondly, Shepard's indoctrination (assuming the theory is correct) does not start when he's knocked out at the end. Indoctrination does not work that way. It's not a switch that Reapers flip and ten minutes later someone's indoctrinated. It's a subtle and drawn out process that doesn't draw attention to itself.
It more likely starts around the time he was knocked out on that base in Arrival, sitting a few rooms away from a massive Reaper artifact. Which explains part of why Shepard is second guessing himself and having nightmares and whatnot throughout ME3.


Indoctrination impacts different people differently. We also know that it is easier to perfom on people who are weakened mentally (Note - shep is quite close to a breakdown after Thessia), and when they have high levels of narcotics and/or Adrenaline in their system (I'd imagine the battle fighting the Destroyer, and the sprint to the beam would cause Shep to have a fair bit of adrenaline pumping about in there).

I Figured Arrival as the best time for it to start, too. Shep gets tricked into opening his mind to the Reapers. His strength-of-will and determination is probably all that stops him being indoctrinated by the start of ME3. The prothean VI's being able to only detect Reaper Tech implants would also be useful, but I thought they used some reaper tech in project Lazarus.

Lastly, the Prothean VI, as has already been stated, DOES recognize Shepard as indoctrinated (according to the theory), or at least partially so. Not on Thessia, but on TIM's base where Shepard asks him what the Catalyst is and the VI replies with "My security protocols have been overridden, I will comply", and the only time we've heard the VI use the phrase "Security protocol" is when he locked down because an indoctrinated presence showed up. It's not a statement or something just saying his protocols have been overridden. It's a direct reply to Shepard.
"I will comply" implies that had his protocols not been overridden, he would have refused to talk to Shepard.


Not necessarily - Kai Leng may have entered proximity for the VI to detect his indoctrination as Shepard asked the question, not to mention the next room contains a mostly-dead proto-reaper. Too many variables to say for certain it was Shepard.

1: I'm just saying indoctrination is a continuous and drawn-out process that is ALWAYS successful in the end (at least until Shepard showed up, according to the theory).
Not one where the Reapers keep trying until it works. Like I said, think more like a glass being filled with drops from a faucet as opposed to trying to fling cards into a hat.

2: I'm not quite sure what you mean by "100 meter forward leap" in relation to whether or not Harbinger "attempts" to indoctrinate Shepard.

3: Pretty much.

4: Maybe Kai leng did enter the proximity, but the Prothean VI sounded like he was addressing Shepard specifically, not anyone else and not referring to anyone else.
Before when it pointed out Kai Leng, it turned around and directed attention towards him.
Like I said, maybe, but it's curious that he's adressing Shepard specifically.

#120
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

DeathScepter wrote...

Indoctrination Theory, I do believe that Shepard started to be indoctrined near the end of Arrival and slowly went down hill from there. The more slowly you get indoctrined, the stronger it become.


What artifact is Shepperd near that allows this indoctrination to continue after the completion of the Arrival DLC?

#121
PsydonZero

PsydonZero
  • Members
  • 41 messages

Holiday wrote...

 Do you remember the Prothean VI on Thessia that Kai Leng took to the Cerberus station? If you do, then you'd also remember that it was able to discern between people who were indoctrinated and people who weren't. It stated that both the Illusive Man and Kai Leng were indeed indoctrinated, while at the same time, stated that Shepard wasn't indoctrinated. There you go. Indoctrination theory disproven.


Yet there were sleeper agents in the Prothean empire.

#122
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

PsydonZero wrote...

Holiday wrote...

 Do you remember the Prothean VI on Thessia that Kai Leng took to the Cerberus station? If you do, then you'd also remember that it was able to discern between people who were indoctrinated and people who weren't. It stated that both the Illusive Man and Kai Leng were indeed indoctrinated, while at the same time, stated that Shepard wasn't indoctrinated. There you go. Indoctrination theory disproven.


Yet there were sleeper agents in the Prothean empire.


You're suggesting these sleeper agents were somehow exposed to the VI and weren't detected. You're inventing history that is not support.

#123
savionen

savionen
  • Members
  • 1 317 messages

CavScout wrote...

ULS 980 wrote...

Mcjon01 wrote...

How do you know it's the same growl?  It was mentioned in a book, nobody ever heard it.  And people like to point out the growling sound you hear when the boy disappears in the vent, while ignoring the fact that there's an actual Reaper right outside the building, stomping around doing Reaper things and making Reaper noises.

Devil's advocate here, maybe, but you gotta admit, if the "growl" was a Reaper making Reaper noises outside, you have to admit the timing was pretty convenient. :U


Convenient for what? Play that mission again. There is Reaper "growling" going on constantly. Why would one, of many, instances of "growling" be convenient?

Isn't it more convenient to take a common place happening, the "growling", and claim to be evidence for some specific event?


It's a specific SFX, at key moments, not used at other places in the game.

#124
MB957

MB957
  • Members
  • 1 526 messages

TarielMaeda wrote...

IMO he doesn't become indoctrinated, he just gets hit with it and is resisting it. An "indoctrinated" individual is one that has given in. If Shep hasn't given in yet, he's not indoctrinated. The closest he comes to being indoctrinated is on the Citadel with Anderson and TIM.


this

#125
ULS 980

ULS 980
  • Members
  • 77 messages

CavScout wrote...

ULS 980 wrote...

CavScout wrote...
Convenient for what? Play that mission again. There is Reaper "growling" going on constantly. Why would one, of many, instances of "growling" be convenient?

Isn't it more convenient to take a common place happening, the "growling", and claim to be evidence for some specific event?

I'm just saying, if the "growl" isn't related to Shepard looking away from the kid that it's incredibly convenient that a Reaper just happened to growl outside at the exact moment that Shepard looked away from the boy.

I don't see how him looking away and the "growl" happening at the same time is a coincidence.
They have to be related.
NOW, whether or not the "growl" is related to indoctrination or not or whether it's more of a "gotcha" sound for the boy disappearing is a different story. I probably lean more towards it's a sound that signifies "WOAH, the boy's gone!" not the him resisting indoctrination.

It's no convenient for anything. Folks are inventing a reason that they be linked when there certainly doesn't have to be any. Reapers "growl". A Reaper outside that "growled" is not proof for a fan theory. Folks arguing that are doing so in a circular fashion. The boy is fake therefore the Reaper "growl" signifies indoctrination failure. The boy is fake because of the Reaper "growl".

If the boy is just a boy then the "growl" is nothing but a Reaper outside make the noises it's been making the entire mission.

I'm not arguing with you. I don't think the sound that plays when Shepard looks away has anything to do indoctrination. What I'm saying is it's just a sound that signified "Gasp! The boy is gone". Kinda akin to a loud sound that plays during a jump scare in a horror movie or something.
The only thing I'm saying is the sound IS related to the Shepard looking away/boy disappearing.