More Sexy Speculation: An Indoctrination Theory (that might blow your mind)
#176
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:31
#177
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:31
Also Final Hours app says different. Unless that is an indoctrination theory too...
...mind.... hurts.
#178
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:33
#179
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:34
It has already been discussed here somewhere and someone said that he wasn't indoctrinated YET. That he was in the process of indoctrination but not yet turned completely.Onpoint17 wrote...
Brilliant! Thank you for taking the time to flesh out this theory. However, I have one issue that I'm not sure was addressed in the dissertation. On Thessia the Prothean VI detected an indoctrinated presence which was Kai Leng. I think that scene made it pretty clear that Shepard was not indoctrinated. I believe in the indoctrination theory but I don't think it had happened that early in the game.
Either way, I'd swap this plothole for the tons of others that the current ending created.
#180
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:36
vivaladricas wrote...
And before anyone objects, a face’s expression isn’t just what it is in a video game. It is a conscious decision of what it is not. If you embrace the child, you burn.
The last couple sentences sort of dont make sense what the perosn is trying to say. A face expression is not just in a game? An aware decision of what is not? Not really sure since the wording there is sloppy. The rest of the article I read I totally agree with, and is well written.
*snip
It makes sense, but some people may find it weird to read. Basically, he's saying that in a game, the developers have to intentionally decide that a character has a certain facial expression. They have to program it to happen. So the expression on the faces of Shepard and the child in that scene looked the way they did on purpose.
If Indoc Theory holds water, then this dream is Shepard's subconcious knowing something is wrong and trying to warn him/her. But the meaning of this kind of dream is muddy if you don't even suspect what's happening.
There are moments when I look at this theory and I think it's too perfect...
#181
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:36
#182
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:39
cynicalandbored wrote...
It has already been discussed here somewhere and someone said that he wasn't indoctrinated YET. That he was in the process of indoctrination but not yet turned completely.Onpoint17 wrote...
Brilliant! Thank you for taking the time to flesh out this theory. However, I have one issue that I'm not sure was addressed in the dissertation. On Thessia the Prothean VI detected an indoctrinated presence which was Kai Leng. I think that scene made it pretty clear that Shepard was not indoctrinated. I believe in the indoctrination theory but I don't think it had happened that early in the game.
Either way, I'd swap this plothole for the tons of others that the current ending created.
Yeah, as a lot of people stated, if the protheans had such a "perfect" method to detect indoctrination they wouldn't have failed building the crucible. I like to think that the prothean VI just can, in fact, detect individuals that have reaper tech implanted.
Then, why the prothean VI states "Security protocols overridden"? I want to think that's not because of Shepard, but because of EDI, a robotic body built with reaper tech. So even if Shepard's indoctrination was "in progress", the prothean VI is unable to detect that.
#183
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:45
Issue that I have is how quiet bw is. The silence is actually one of the main reasons that I'm nervous about the theory
#184
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:45
Hmmmmmmm
Did not know about that audio que when your walking towards the choices.
Hmmmmmmm... hope for theory returning.
#185
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:47
#186
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:48
They have to wait on EA to say something IMO. And also LOTS OF SPECULATION FOR EVERYONE may actually be what all this is about. As in that's what they wanted to induce, but something they'd solve in the upcoming weeks.Golferguy758 wrote...
Issue that I have is how quiet bw is. The silence is actually one of the main reasons that I'm nervous about the theory
I pray that all this is a twisted marketing gimmick.
#187
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:49
#188
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:51
#189
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:55
#190
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:58
#191
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 05:58
#192
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 06:01
Doctor Moustache wrote...
*Sits back stroking beard*
Hmmmmmmm
Did not know about that audio que when your walking towards the choices.
Hmmmmmmm... hope for theory returning.
Is it true?
Have you tested it multiple times?
#193
Guest_vivaladricas_*
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 06:02
Guest_vivaladricas_*
mghjr6 wrote...
It makes sense, but some people may find it weird to read. Basically, he's saying that in a game, the developers have to intentionally decide that a character has a certain facial expression. They have to program it to happen. So the expression on the faces of Shepard and the child in that scene looked the way they did on purpose.
If Indoc Theory holds water, then this dream is Shepard's subconcious knowing something is wrong and trying to warn him/her. But the meaning of this kind of dream is muddy if you don't even suspect what's happening.
There are moments when I look at this theory and I think it's too perfect...
Okay that clears up he was speaking of design choices by the programmers. He says "its a conscious decision of what it is not." Then says a child and Shep burning is what it is not. So is he/she saying that saving the kid doesnt mean he will die or the opposite. I really dont think I am being dumb here, I just dont get the wording and for some reason want to get it. LOL Driving me nuts.
Yes the theory does seem perfect at times. Everything is written so well and for Bioware to leave that many holes does seem very funny. It would almost top "would ya kindly" from Bioshock, that one threw me for a loop. Personal preference.
Modifié par vivaladricas, 20 mars 2012 - 06:04 .
#194
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 06:02
I think if they really wanted to do a false ending and surprise us, it would have been revealed after the credits and we would then keep playing to get the real ending. Fake us out. Not this mess.
But then again, they are being rather diplomatic about it, aren't they? Not giving us an answer on a DLC ending or something like it. Kind of fishy, but it could just be damage control while they're panicking behind the scenes.
I'm not so sure on the "They planned this all along" theory, but my mind will be blown out my face if it's true. This was a really good read and is just about the best breakdown of the Indoc Theory I've seen so far.
#195
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 06:03
* Earth is there because that is what we are fighting for.
* The citadel is the biggest and most powerfull mass relay of them all. The crucible was built through many many cycles by the races under attack from the reapers, makes sens to attach it to the most powerfull device in the galaxy.
* You are allowed choice because the creators perfect solution failed and when perfection fails, what do you do?
* Im pretty sure Anderson ask if you are there at first.
* The child was the symbol of loss and tragedy through the entire game, a dead child is still one of the most emotionally powerfull "things"(for lack of a better word) in our culture. It represented how the fight was taking its toll on Shepard, and how he fought with guilt over not being able to save everyone.
The author says BW wouldnt make these mistakes? Dead squadmates reaper in cutscenes. And what about the Normandy crash? Where does that fit in the indoc. theory?
Imo the indoc. theory is an act of desperation, in lack of answears and understanding you attribute meaning to that wich has none. Its a basic psychological funtion. Too me the indoc. theory is this:
"You walk down an empty road carrying a very heavy stone, in the middle of the road you suddenly notice a big bucket. What is it doing there? What is its purpose? Upon closer inspection you notice that the stone fits perfectly into the bucket, ergo; the bucket was made and placed there specifically to aid you in carrying the stone."
Time will tell I guess. If we hear nothing on the matter from BW then this theory is false for sure. They would never just leave an indoc. ending be, they will sooner or later give answers. I for one am not holding my breath.
#196
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 06:03
Modifié par j78, 20 mars 2012 - 06:04 .
#197
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 06:04
#198
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 06:05
PD: If I got caught I'll explain using Space Magic.
Modifié par asdoorip, 20 mars 2012 - 06:06 .
#199
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 06:06
#200
Posté 20 mars 2012 - 06:11
If it's true and Bioware has been playing mind-games with us all along.. Well, sh*t.





Retour en haut





