Really disappointed in this game
#1
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 04:07
-The graphics (on pc) are horrible. i have them at max and they look like nwn 2 and sometimes even worse. That wouldn't be so bad if the animations didn't look like they were taken from nwn 1. Everything from the way people's lips move to how characters run looks old and pathetic. After how good Mass Effect looked (yes i realize they are slightly different styles of game which different engines but still), i expected at least as good a looking game.
-The characters i've encountered so far are boring. Totally uninteresting in every way. I realize this is a matter of personal preference, but considering Biowares previous games, it is one of the more disappointing aspects of this game.
-Balance. Many fights are easy to only slightly challenging, then you come across a group of enemies in the same area which just annihilate your party.
-I bought the deluxe edition on steam because of the bonus items. Now i find out two of those items (Final Reason and Bergans Honor) i don't actually get as is implied on the website, but rather i have to buy them from the merchants. Seriously? I paid extra for some lame dlc and two extra items in a merchents inventory.
I have bought every D&D based game from Bioware and Obsidian, not to mention KotoR 1 and 2, and was considering buying ME2 after enjoying playing the first one on my friends computer a little. But i feel incredibly ripped off after buying DAO. Spiritual successor to BG my ass. I'm not buying anymore Bioware games until i've had a chance to play them first and confirm they aren't rubbish.
#2
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 04:13
I guess I have to go burn my copy of Civilization IV because it doesn't look like Crysis. (Never mind that Crysis gameplay is about as interesting as Sarah Palin's bookshelf...)
And if your entire party is getting wiped on Normal, you're not using your head.
Modifié par Wretched Gnu, 30 novembre 2009 - 04:19 .
#3
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 04:20
It's not perfect, and there are plenty of areas to improve on, certainly some of which can be called disappointing, but overall this is a great game. Stick with it and you'l see what I mean.
#4
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 04:24
For the record, I thought the game looks very similar to Mass Effect as far as graphics go, and in some cases much better. I guess that shows that tastes differ.
As for the characters, I feel there are some truly great NPCs in the game. How many have you run into and have you explored some of their stories?
The deluxe edition also included Warden's Keep, so you didn't pay for just the couple extra items. As to the fact that two of them are at merchants, I confess that threw me as well, as I thought they'd be free to your character.
#5
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 04:35
And as for the DLC that came with your the deluxe editions... well, in some ways I share your feelings. Myself, I kind of expected more for the extra money paid. But then, for some 60 dollars of a game, I don't mind. The price of a games hasn't risen over the past 15 years at least, so meh
#6
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 04:58
I would like to point out those two items were free and came as a part of the pre-order bonus. The things you paid extra for was Warden's Keep, an hour long dungeon that adds a lot of neat little points and some extra decent loot and when you're done, you're a little stronger than you were before.DogFaceMan_ac wrote...
-I bought the deluxe edition on steam because of the bonus items. Now i find out two of those items (Final Reason and Bergans Honor) i don't actually get as is implied on the website, but rather i have to buy them from the merchants. Seriously? I paid extra for some lame dlc and two extra items in a merchents inventory.
Anything such as a weapon or armor provided by DLC is sometimes just added to stores, but they never have forced you to pay for it.
#7
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 05:00
Sorry for the sarcasm, I've had two little kids as interns in my company and gotten tired of their complaints about the old games I play when the business is slow.
#8
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 05:41
In regards to graphics, my objection is that a) this is a big budget, full price game (as someone mentioned earlier) and that it is the animations more then the low res textures which irritate me the most. I can enjoy a game with poor graphics. I still regularly play older games i loved which look horrible these days, but i expect better from a big name developer and a full price game.
As for the items, if they had just stated plainly and clearly that they had to be bought in game, rather then leading me to believe i would automatically get them, i wouldn't have been nearly as annoyed.
I'll persist with the game for now, but i'm really not enjoying it at the moment (though i am trying). I just don't feel (so far) that this a good game compared to other pc rpgs, even dare i say it, WoW, and i do feel ripped off.
#9
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 05:45
You, sir, have made me laugh. Nice rebuttal.Wretched Gnu wrote...
Oh dear. This game hurts your delicate little eyes because there are better graphics out there? Golly, that must mean your face literally melts when you play the best computer games ever created -- including titles like BG2 -- because their graphics are clearly much much worse than Dragon Age's.
I guess I have to go burn my copy of Civilization IV because it doesn't look like Crysis. (Never mind that Crysis gameplay is about as interesting as Sarah Palin's bookshelf...)
And if your entire party is getting wiped on Normal, you're not using your head.
#10
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 05:49
Adding to WGnu's ... watch some movies on youtube... there are strategy ones, tutorial ones and I'm making a party dialogue compilation which might change your opinion about the characters. (not the cutscenes.. for those there are movies as well and for great NPC's that are not party recrutable)
(I have it on max too and it looks really great for me and even compressed videos still look good on the tube in HQ)
#11
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 05:55
You're welcome to your opinion; individual tastes vary and this game may well not be to your taste. However, I have to point out something. OF COURSE the NPCs you first meet are boring...YOU JUST MET THEM!!!
#12
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 05:59
#13
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 06:07
Let's look at this deeper: Why would someone like WoW?
a) PvP
c) Expansive world with no set/clear/linear direction
Why play DA:O?
a) Overall story, first and foremost (as with all Bioware titles)
c) Tactical combat system that yes, takes some thought, even to all the OP mages playing on Nightmare.
d) Story, again.
If you had more fun on WoW, maybe the reasons to play a Bioware title aren't reason enough for you. If you liked them previously but not now, maybe you've changed and an MMO is more to your liking. It's hard to compare the two as: Which is a better RPG, because MMO's and story bases, singleplayer RPG's are two very different things.
Edited got spelling. How about a preview button, guys?!
Modifié par thisisme8, 30 novembre 2009 - 06:08 .
#14
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 06:10
Yes, the animations are pretty bad. This was easily the most noticeable fault when I started playing. Other than that I think the graphics are fine (though items could use more variety.)DogFaceMan_ac wrote...
Like the title says. I feel this game was a major disappointment, and here's why:
-The graphics (on pc) are horrible. i have them at max and they look like nwn 2 and sometimes even worse. That wouldn't be so bad if the animations didn't look like they were taken from nwn 1. Everything from the way people's lips move to how characters run looks old and pathetic. After how good Mass Effect looked (yes i realize they are slightly different styles of game which different engines but still), i expected at least as good a looking game.
-The characters i've encountered so far are boring. Totally uninteresting in every way. I realize this is a matter of personal preference, but considering Biowares previous games, it is one of the more disappointing aspects of this game.
-Balance. Many fights are easy to only slightly challenging, then you come across a group of enemies in the same area which just annihilate your party.
-I bought the deluxe edition on steam because of the bonus items. Now i find out two of those items (Final Reason and Bergans Honor) i don't actually get as is implied on the website, but rather i have to buy them from the merchants. Seriously? I paid extra for some lame dlc and two extra items in a merchents inventory.
I have bought every D&D based game from Bioware and Obsidian, not to mention KotoR 1 and 2, and was considering buying ME2 after enjoying playing the first one on my friends computer a little. But i feel incredibly ripped off after buying DAO. Spiritual successor to BG my ass. I'm not buying anymore Bioware games until i've had a chance to play them first and confirm they aren't rubbish.
I think the characters are interesting, but I do miss the "unique" characters from BG2 that have special abilities that the class doesn't normally get (like Mazzy having paladin skills or Jan being able to make special bolts.) Wynne gets one but that's it. Why do you think they're uninteresting?
The balance is fine (played on nightmare,) but you need a balanced party as well while using everything at your disposal. When I started a new game with mostly warriors I found that if your characters have to share loot between each other then you might have trouble.
Requiring bonus items to be bought from a vendor (this was actually done in NWN2 as well if you recall) makes more sense than just dropping them in your lap out of nowhere. The dlc & bonus items are so powerful in this that it would more appropriate for them to be rewards from difficult optional encounters.
Modifié par Zibon, 30 novembre 2009 - 06:30 .
#15
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 06:13
Eurypterid wrote...
There's no need to toss insults at the OP just because he's expressing an opinion you happen to disagree with.
It's all in the delivery of the message. Rarely will you find anyone getting jumped on even if they are being critical if they post in a reason fashion. No one should be surprised if other posters take offense to threads started in an obvious bating fashion. Like this one.
#16
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 06:18
If you want that over-lit, washed out hi-res look then maybe Assasin's Creed 2 would be good for you? Or maybe Uncharted?
It's a trade-off ; do you want them spending time on making sure the graphics engine is the latest, or gameplay?
Modifié par Bored Games, 30 novembre 2009 - 11:15 .
#17
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 06:21
#18
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 06:21
DogFaceMan_ac wrote...
Like the title says. I feel this game was a major disappointment, and here's why:
-The graphics (on pc) are horrible. i have them at max and they look like nwn 2 and sometimes even worse. That wouldn't be so bad if the animations didn't look like they were taken from nwn 1. Everything from the way people's lips move to how characters run looks old and pathetic. After how good Mass Effect looked (yes i realize they are slightly different styles of game which different engines but still), i expected at least as good a looking game.
-The characters i've encountered so far are boring. Totally uninteresting in every way. I realize this is a matter of personal preference, but considering Biowares previous games, it is one of the more disappointing aspects of this game.
-Balance. Many fights are easy to only slightly challenging, then you come across a group of enemies in the same area which just annihilate your party.
-I bought the deluxe edition on steam because of the bonus items. Now i find out two of those items (Final Reason and Bergans Honor) i don't actually get as is implied on the website, but rather i have to buy them from the merchants. Seriously? I paid extra for some lame dlc and two extra items in a merchents inventory.
I have bought every D&D based game from Bioware and Obsidian, not to mention KotoR 1 and 2, and was considering buying ME2 after enjoying playing the first one on my friends computer a little. But i feel incredibly ripped off after buying DAO. Spiritual successor to BG my ass. I'm not buying anymore Bioware games until i've had a chance to play them first and confirm they aren't rubbish.
I disagree with you on all but one count. I too have nearly every PC-based game Bioware has ever produced because they don't disappoint me. They provide all the elements I am looking for in a hybrid RPG game.
For me, it isn't about splashy graphics, it's about the plot, storyline, and character interaction. It's about the whole package, not the fine details. I want a gameplay experience that keeps me engaged with room for expansion.
In DAO, the characters have distinct personalities and each has their own individual agendas that are well-woven into the overall storyline. The challenge isn't just about the fights, its about the decisions that come in between the fights.
I find DAO to be quite entertaining and fun. I was laughing when I saw how many voice-actors/tresses are big names in Sci-Fi shows (Claudia Black, Kate Mulgrew, Tim Curry, and Tim Russ, to name a few).
The only thing I find I can agree with you is that you should demo a game you are interested in before you buy it.
Sorry you were disappointed.
Modifié par tanstaafl28, 30 novembre 2009 - 06:24 .
#19
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 06:25
as for bonus content, as long as people keep buying it the way it is, they will keep making it the way it is.
#20
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 06:25
Bored Games wrote...
I prefer the graphics to those of Oblivion or Fallout 3, but that's much to do with artistic appearence than quality.
If you want that overlit, washing out hi-res look then maybe Assasin's Creed 2 would be good for you? Or maybe Uncharted?
It's a tradeoff ; do you want them speding time on making sure the graphics engine is the latest, or gameplay?
Nope i didn't like the graphics of Fallout 3, particularly the one you are playing with. Walks like a sissy with a broken ankle and a distorted body.
#21
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 06:26
#22
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 06:29
I will agree that the graphics in DAO are seriously lacking in some areas but not as bad as you seem to believe. There are a number of low res textures mixed in with the high setting, the character models look like they suffer from sausage arm syndrome on both the unclothed model and the leather armors. There is a lot about this game that could stand improvement BUT, the gameplay is awesome and I personaly think the animations are pretty good in DAO. As for balance, I quite like the way things are set up.
Basicly, if you don't like the game thats your right but please don't make unrealistic comments about how this or that OLD game looks better because its simply not true. I installed ME again in antisipation of ME2 and I cuoldn't bring myself to play it the graphics were so dated next to DAO.
#23
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 08:23
And bioware wanted it to be able to run on MANY different computers.
So they had to make some tradeoffs to make sure it would work smoothly at both the closest and furthest out zoom...
#24
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 09:03
I regret to have tried Aion character creator before DAO >_<
Bioware could've keep the graphics of the game the way they're now if they had ut much effort on the paperdolls !
Modifié par Walina, 30 novembre 2009 - 09:04 .
#25
Posté 30 novembre 2009 - 09:14
Not that it matters, because in the end: WHO CARES? Story-wise DA is an awesome game. I have actually lost a lot of sleep over this game, completely losing track of time because you get so drawn in by the game world. As mentioned above: NWN was a good game, Baldur's Gate/Icewind Dale were godlike games and their graphics aren't anything like what we are used to today (though, some BG environments still keep impressing me). Does that suddenly make them bad games now?
Maybe the OP should go back to playing shooter/techdemo #646312 if DA is unworthy of him due to the graphics.
Modifié par boe2, 30 novembre 2009 - 09:16 .





Retour en haut






