Modifié par Tigercml, 08 mai 2012 - 07:02 .
Skeloton wrote...
I can't vote either way as both for me are of equal priority.
Rogue1982 wrote...
It is quite clear that a lot of ME3 workload put emphasis on 'polishing' the gameplay (the shooter part) and its elements, while I was of the impression people would have liked it the way it was in ME2 just fine. Instead, story elements was where many sought ME3 strength... and got somewhat (if not strongly) burnt, especially by the ending.
Vormaerin wrote...
Rogue1982 wrote...
It is quite clear that a lot of ME3 workload put emphasis on 'polishing' the gameplay (the shooter part) and its elements, while I was of the impression people would have liked it the way it was in ME2 just fine. Instead, story elements was where many sought ME3 strength... and got somewhat (if not strongly) burnt, especially by the ending.
That's not clear at all, actually. The gameplay is mostly better than ME2's, but how much of the development time that took isn't clear.
Also, you act like those zots are interchangeable. No amount of extra time by the systems designer team is going to improve the quality of the story the writers develop. Unless you think they were going to fire the systems designers and hire more writers?
Modifié par Rogue1982, 08 mai 2012 - 08:42 .
That's because RPGs are a special kind of game. That's the reason why RPG gameplay can be that different from one game to the other, because in those games gameplay is the the means instead of the goal.Tigercml wrote...
So you all PLAY GAMES for story and not gameplay. How can you say gameplay is not important. GAMEPLAY IS THE CORE AND PURPOSE OF VIDEO GAMES. And yet you all say its not important. How can you call yourself a gamer and say that gameplay is not important. Do you people have any idea how stupid it makes you all sound. Do you even want video games or do you just want interactive movies that take little to no effort to play. GAMEPLAY WILL ALWAYS AND FOREVER BE THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF GAMING. Considering the point of a video game is to PLAY it.
A game with a bad story can still be good if the gameplay is there. But a game with a good story and bad gameplay makes a bad game. Especially considering that %99 of the time you will be PLAYING the crappy game and not watching the cutscenes. If you guys like story so much why don't you just watch movies or read a book.
Who PLAYS video games for the GAMEPLAY. Thats just absurd.
brain_damage wrote...
Those 42 people need to remove themselves from the gene pool.
Kakita Tatsumaru wrote...
That's because RPGs are a special kind of game. That's the reason why RPG gameplay can be that different from one game to the other, because in those games gameplay is the the means instead of the goal.Tigercml wrote...
So you all PLAY GAMES for story and not gameplay. How can you say gameplay is not important. GAMEPLAY IS THE CORE AND PURPOSE OF VIDEO GAMES. And yet you all say its not important. How can you call yourself a gamer and say that gameplay is not important. Do you people have any idea how stupid it makes you all sound. Do you even want video games or do you just want interactive movies that take little to no effort to play. GAMEPLAY WILL ALWAYS AND FOREVER BE THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF GAMING. Considering the point of a video game is to PLAY it.
A game with a bad story can still be good if the gameplay is there. But a game with a good story and bad gameplay makes a bad game. Especially considering that %99 of the time you will be PLAYING the crappy game and not watching the cutscenes. If you guys like story so much why don't you just watch movies or read a book.
Who PLAYS video games for the GAMEPLAY. Thats just absurd.
Tabletop RPG game systems are usually crap, still they're usually great experience.Tigercml wrote...
RPG's are all about gameplay. Gameplay is most important in RPG's. A good RPG is 100+ hours. So for that 100+ hours your ok with mediocre gameplay. As long as the few hours of story are good. That makes no sense.
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
THIS!!!Tigercml wrote...
So you all PLAY GAMES for story and not gameplay. How can you say gameplay is not important. GAMEPLAY IS THE CORE AND PURPOSE OF VIDEO GAMES. And yet you all say its not important. How can you call yourself a gamer and say that gameplay is not important. Do you people have any idea how stupid it makes you all sound. Do you even want video games or do you just want interactive movies that take little to no effort to play. GAMEPLAY WILL ALWAYS AND FOREVER BE THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF GAMING. Considering the point of a video game is to PLAY it.
A game with a bad story can still be good if the gameplay is there. But a game with a good story and bad gameplay makes a bad game. Especially considering that %99 of the time you will be PLAYING the crappy game and not watching the cutscenes. If you guys like story so much why don't you just watch movies or read a book.
Who PLAYS video games for the GAMEPLAY. Thats just absurd.
Tigercml wrote...
So you all PLAY GAMES for story and not gameplay. How can you say gameplay is not important. GAMEPLAY IS THE CORE AND PURPOSE OF VIDEO GAMES. And yet you all say its not important. How can you call yourself a gamer and say that gameplay is not important. Do you people have any idea how stupid it makes you all sound. Do you even want video games or do you just want interactive movies that take little to no effort to play. GAMEPLAY WILL ALWAYS AND FOREVER BE THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF GAMING. Considering the point of a video game is to PLAY it.
A game with a bad story can still be good if the gameplay is there. But a game with a good story and bad gameplay makes a bad game. Especially considering that %99 of the time you will be PLAYING the crappy game and not watching the cutscenes. If you guys like story so much why don't you just watch movies or read a book.
Who PLAYS video games for the GAMEPLAY. Thats just absurd.
Modifié par Cyne, 09 mai 2012 - 12:24 .
Retour en haut