Dav3VsTh3World wrote...
fayt002 wrote...
people that like the ending are people that are swayed by politicans commercials. they just take it at face value.
Can I just make a point about this? What gives people in the louder crowd the right to insult people that don't agree with them? And make claims that they're dumb or being bought out? Why can't these people accept that there are people out there freely have a different opinion than they do, hell its what the Premisis of Freedom of Speech is all about, you may not like what the opposing party says but that doesn't give you the right to slander them and tell them to shut up.
What fayt002 said is obviously an inflamatory and sweeping generalization.
Not many here are going to outright call you dumb for your opinion. Yes, you are entitled to have your opinion and you can state it whenever you wish, but it does not constitute an argument.
Obviously there are people who just make inflamatory remarks, which is wrong, but we all do it sometimes and the best way not to give that behavior incentive is to ignore it. If you want people to respect your views, forget people that say those things and try to explain why you think that the ending was good based on its own merits, without resorting to the same inflamatory tactics or just resting on the argument that it's your opinion.
I am probably not going to change your opinion and you are not going to change mine, so why even enter a discussion that is defined by those terms? It can only have one outcome. Instead, try to argue for what you feel are the objective merits for the endings. Be prepared to debate them, though.