The Angry One wrote...
111987 wrote...
So now my interpretation of symbolism is wrong? Okay...clearly no point in continuing this conversation.
There is no symbolism. That's part of the problem here, pretending that there is.
Feel free to back out, just do me a favour and stop seeing things that aren't there, you are not helping BioWare like this.
The devs have said themselves that the jungle planet symbolizes new beginnings. Just because you say there isn't symbolism doesn't make it right, just like you don't have to see the symbolism if you don't want to. Neither of us is wrong (although I am sure you will still tell me that I am indeed, wrong).
The Angry One wrote...
Didn't mention that here, but if you extrapolate from the evidence we are shown, then yes it is.
In all 3 games the mass relays are presented as essential, in ME3 all advanced systems have been devastated and require serious aid, which they now don't have.
Mac Walters' own notes refer to a "galactic dark age", the intent is clear enough.
The Mass Relays were essential to galactic relations. They were also essential to the Reaper's cycle. The destruction of the relays can be seen as a symbol of the destruction, or ending of the cycle. Yeah, it will cost organics greatly, but in the long run, they have a future to look towards.
In any case I know you will disagree with me until the end of time, so I think I'm done here.
Modifié par 111987, 21 mars 2012 - 08:32 .