Ray's Response
#126
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:28
Hold the line.
#127
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:29
If thats art then i'd love to see what they make of a real masterpiece.
#128
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:29
#129
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:29
Dap Brannigan wrote...
So the indoctrination theory isn't true? The endings are to be accepted at face value?
Ugh, that's awful. What the hell, Bioware.
There's nothing in this, or anything that the developers have said, that conclusively rules this out.
They are being exceptionally cagey, though, for sure.
#130
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:29
#131
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:29
Nykara wrote...
Mr. Big Pimpin wrote...
I have the feeling people will just keep on believing it anyway.Gibb_Shepard wrote...
HAHA! The bullet to the indoc theories head! I WAS WAITING FOR THIS DAY!
Yep because nothing in that post changes anything. Once again it is very cleverly written to not give away a thing. They could simply be finishing off the true ending as they always intended to do. The 'most' fans could include those who believe in alternative theories and that bioware was / is infact planing something all along.
Hold the line.
Oh god, i laughed so hard i'm weezing.
#132
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:29
I agree, the rhetoric can really get nasty sometimes against Bioware. It doesn't help the cause.tobito113 wrote...
Davian1980 wrote...
tobito113 wrote...
Brahlis wrote...
Am I the only one that reads that and thinks he's largely dismissive of everyone against the ending? He spends more time dancing around the issue and refuses to acknowledge any type of mistake on Bioware's part.
No youre not, the rest of the Hold the Line movement is acting just as stupid as you are
And there we go with the insults again.
Yeah because he is being dismissive of you by talking about people who didnt like the endings and saying they will give more information in the future. The hatred for anything Bioware say on these forums is absolutely appaling...
#133
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:30
It seems like fans are going to accept nothing less than Bioware completely grovelling before them.
#134
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:30
I think the most we're going to get from BW is maybe some add-on epilogues to "clarify" the unclarifiable... ness... ous?
#135
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:30
#136
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:30
Bioware truly cares about its fans, anyone saying otherwise needs a reality check.
#137
Guest_Guest12345_*
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:30
Guest_Guest12345_*
Nothing is more upsetting to me than the incoherence and inconsistency of the ME3 ending. I hope this will be improved.
#138
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:31
#139
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:31
Zardoc wrote...
I'd like to know how they "explain" the endings without massive use of space magic and retconning.
-Give a scene with joker rescuing the ground team (there is hidden dialogue about that already, the scene was removed from the game)
-Show a scene where new technology for FTL travel is used (cerberus is said to be discovering technology that bypass the need for mass relays) so the galaxy isnt "doomed"
-Remove the scene where the ship gets crashed, thus removing any reason to think it actually happened.
-Give more of the dialogue that was cut about how the cataclyst works and why the reapers are doing what they did (the App said it was removed content)
-Make DAO style slideshow that tell you the results of your choices in the future, thus invalidating the argument that the choices you make are meaningless.
Thats all they need to do actually...
#140
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:31
I told you; indoctrination theorists are like creationists. No evidence will persuade them that their theory is false.Gibb_Shepard wrote...
Nykara wrote...
Mr. Big Pimpin wrote...
I have the feeling people will just keep on believing it anyway.Gibb_Shepard wrote...
HAHA! The bullet to the indoc theories head! I WAS WAITING FOR THIS DAY!
Yep because nothing in that post changes anything. Once again it is very cleverly written to not give away a thing. They could simply be finishing off the true ending as they always intended to do. The 'most' fans could include those who believe in alternative theories and that bioware was / is infact planing something all along.
Hold the line.
Oh god, i laughed so hard i'm weezing.
#141
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:31
Oh well. Boo, it was cool.
#142
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:31
2. Closure, ingame engine cutscene Epilogue NOT a storyboard.
3. No Plot holes, the current ending is filled with them. This is the main problem as it stands.
4. Make war assets important, Dragon Age did it well where you could call in reinforcements in the last battle.
5. Either admit Indoctrination Theory or at least run with it. You only have to add instead of change or outright dismiss.
Do these, I would implore them to make it free but I would be willing to pay.
How they didn't originally do this is beyond me.
Modifié par Paragon Auducan, 21 mars 2012 - 03:33 .
#143
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:32
#144
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:32
#145
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:32
Mass Effect 3 was an amazing game 99% of the way through. Only the very end was a let down. Have faith in the guys that made the wonderful experience that constituted that 99%.
I was severely disappointed in the ending. I hated the Star Child Reaper King.
But, I believe in Bioware.
#146
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:32
#147
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:32
I think it's now important that WE listen to HIM, and take his advice when it comes to being contructive, complaining for the sake of complaining is pointless.
#148
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:32
#149
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:32
I still find their apparent confusion over the fan reaction to be itself confusing; I guess it's just a matter of being so close to the project that they weren't able to step outside and see it from any other angle, and probably having inside knowledge helps too. I do believe them when they say they're listening, at least -- they can't afford not to. Time will tell.
#150
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 03:32
The entire post was more wishy-washy then I'm willing to accept. Don't try and make sense of the nonsensical. If you can actually make the starchilds circular logic make sense without introducing more plot holes, well done, I don't think you can. Because that entire scene is a betrayal of Shepard's character throughout the entire series on top of the awful logic presented to your fans who's intellect you have vastly underestimated if you think you can pass that off as deep and meaningful.
I personally don't want to have the existing endings explained to me, because that's insulting. That implies that they already make sense and we're just not clever enough to get it. The endings are ****, they are bad from a literary and objective standpoint.
Give us what we're asking for, alternatives, not more BS explanation for that which you understandably cannot admit is rubbish this early on.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




