First of all: Thank you for taking time to write us this summary or letter, what you want to call it is up to you.
While I think that it is in fact a good thing to hear from you, there are some points in your letter which I want to point out:
"However, most folks appear to agree that
the game as a whole is exceptional, with more than 75 critics giving it a
perfect review score and a review average in the mid-90s. Net, I’m
proud of the team, but we can and must always strive to do better."
Indeed, the game is exceptionally good. From the beginning at Earth until the Reaper beam hits you, it is a good game, and until the Reaper beam I would consider it one of my "Most favorite of all time", taking a seat directly besides Final Fantasy X (For beeing a timeless classic PS2 game) and Skyrim. However, the end, everything that happens after the Reaper beam, is nearly
killing the game, no, the trilogy itself. I see the point you are comming from, by posting the reviews, but sadly: Those reviews will NOT buy further DLC in a number that could even close bring a good income. WE, the dedicated Bioware fans and gamers, are the people buying DLC. And as many said: At the current ending, which is so massiv full of plot-holes and gives not even a single bit of clarification and/or satisfaction, I see no point in buying a pre-Earth attack DLC.
"...has unfortunately become destructive rather than constructive. "
That is, as in the context of "Flaming" and/or harrasing, not true. The #RetakeMassEffect movement has always been very clear about our motives, and we do not flame or harras your employess at any time.There are more then a thousand good examples on how the game could end.
"Exec Producer Casey Hudson and the team
are hard at work on a number of game content initiatives that will help
answer the questions, providing more clarity for those seeking further
closure to their journey".
It is not so much about "We want to know why my LI is now on the Normandy!". It is about having what we were promised to get: 16 vastly different endings, based on the choices we have made. While we have to admit that the current endings are Indeed "different", as in "Not
exactly the same.", there is no real distinction between them. Someone sums it up:
"(Destroy/Synth/Control), (Red,Green,Blue) colored explosions, Shepard dies, Mass Relays blow up, Normandy crashes.".
While the cutscene still slightly varies in the first ~30 seconds, it is the EXACT same cutscene after the beam reaches the relay. Excuse me, but in what way are those: "16 different endings, which will play out vastly different". If you advertise with it, make them vastly different. Yes, blow up the relays, Crash the Normandy, kill Shepard, but Reapers destroyed. Let that be the "Semi-bad" ending. Make a happy ending where everything is sunny and rainbow, make a bad ending where the Reapers win.
"At the same time, I also believe in and support the artistic choices made by the development team"
I can also fully understand where you are coming from, and I said in my e-mail that no one has to tell you by law what you must do. But, considering that so many fans are upset, don't you think it is time to sit down and say: "MAYBE we made some slight mistakes here and there.". We have in no way the right to demand anything, but don't you want to see your customers happy after playing your product, saying: "This was worth the time and money! 100% epic." rather then: "It was 99% good. Then, the ending killed the trilogy.". Do you want, considering it's current state, to let Mass Effect be remembered as: "The game which ending killed hundreds of hours and scared away a fanbase!".
"
some of our
loyal fans are passionately expressing their displeasure about how their game concluded".
Excuse me to be rude here, but: It is certainly not only the "Minority of the loyal fan base.". I know people who have never even played a Bioware game before who tell me now: "You know, when you told me about Mass Effect in januar, I was excited...now...I am disappointed.". It is not the minority of fans, it is the majority of people who have played the game. If you think that we (As in people who dislike the ending) are few, you are wrong. We are many, in fact: "We are Legion". There are already people in local media stores telling people before they pay for the copy: "You have heard about the ending controversy...are you sure to buy this? No refund to opened copies.". In fact, everyone I ask in our vocational schools says the same: "Mass Effect 3 endings are bad."
Now an appeal from me:
Bioware, you have created an awesome piece of art. Since my first hour in Mass Effect 1 I was so fascinated, like so many other people. You created the very first Sci fi setting besides Star Wars that I love, in fact, Mass Effect tops star wars, as I can create my own story.
Bioware, make it count. You are two steps away, one Patch, one fix, to make the trilogy that will always be remembered as "Epic.". Do not let us down. Not just consider "To answer questions.", but to give us back the trilogy.
The Reapers have become a childs toy, no living Nightmare, their reason of existance fading away for beeing "Unreasonable" and "stupid". Give us back the Nightmare. Make the catalyst different, and I do not care who or what it will be. But not some VI like this. I respect your writers...but this can't be everything, can it?
Modifié par LPKerberos, 21 mars 2012 - 06:03 .