You're establishing a straw man. By your standards no means of gauging reaction is valid.
By my standards, and by acceptable statistical standards - the only real way is.. you guessed it... RANDOM SAMPLING.
You're establishing a straw man. By your standards no means of gauging reaction is valid.
I also am fully under the asumption that nobody at Bioware would have cared one twig about the customers perceivence of the quality of the game if money weren't hurting now in some way. Either through loss of rep inflicting harm on future titles/distribution-negotations or direct affectance of current sales.
Finally.. I have a hard time seeing someone being proud of artistic integrity when the product being discussed contains poorly photoshopped images pulled directly from the web. It just doesn't fly with me, tbh.
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Cadence of the Planes wrote...
You're establishing a straw man. By your standards no means of gauging reaction is valid.
By my standards, and by acceptable statistical standards - the only real way is.. you guessed it... RANDOM SAMPLING.
1) Arguing about intent isn't going to get us very far- we could sit
here for days and argue about Bioware's intent. What matters is that at
least they're responding to the outcry.
Modifié par Zwei133, 22 mars 2012 - 07:23 .
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Zwei133 wrote...
Warth, there is always a way to do a random sampling. For example, EA knows everyone who has played Mass Effect 3 (origin) and could email those users a survey.
Now, you might say only the most passionate would reply, but that is why you need to create an incentive. Restaurants do it all the time; take this five minute survey and you could win a $50 gift card. Some even give you a free appetizer when you take their survey.
Thus, EA could offer discounted DLC, a free game, some prize, or something to make those who can't be bothered respond.
Modifié par Heliosas, 22 mars 2012 - 07:25 .
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Heliosas wrote...
You know you guys arguing over what makes a valid representation of our view via polls ect is just totally derailing this thread. I know you both think you are right, and there is this whole bit about free speech and what not..but you are killing this threads real point. Please just agree to disagree and let the actual topic/debate take its natural course.
Modifié par Zwei133, 22 mars 2012 - 07:32 .
venom56321489 wrote...
I JUST FEAR BIOWARE IS HEADED TO A MORE FIRST PERSON SHOOTER GENRE. ME3 HAD LESS DIALOGUE, HAD MULTIPLAYER. AND THEIR IPAD GAME IS JUST STRAIGHT FIRST PERSON SHOOTER. THEY SEEM TO WANT TO COPY COD MORE SHOOTER, LESS STORY. BIOWARE MIGHT BE LOSING THEIR TOUCH OR SELLING OUT.
bigstig wrote...
venom56321489 wrote...
I JUST FEAR BIOWARE IS HEADED TO A MORE FIRST PERSON SHOOTER GENRE. ME3 HAD LESS DIALOGUE, HAD MULTIPLAYER. AND THEIR IPAD GAME IS JUST STRAIGHT FIRST PERSON SHOOTER. THEY SEEM TO WANT TO COPY COD MORE SHOOTER, LESS STORY. BIOWARE MIGHT BE LOSING THEIR TOUCH OR SELLING OUT.
I think the iPad game was (a) not made by Bioware and (a 3rd person shooter like the main game
Modifié par Zwei133, 22 mars 2012 - 07:48 .
BrotherWarth wrote...
Cadence of the Planes wrote...
You're establishing a straw man. By your standards no means of gauging reaction is valid.
By my standards, and by acceptable statistical standards - the only real way is.. you guessed it... RANDOM SAMPLING.
But you've stated that no method is applicable because only the most passionate of fans post their own opinions.
venom56321489 wrote...
I AM STILL DEBATING RETURNING MY ME3. I WANT A NEW ENDING NOT JUST EXTRA EXPLANATION. IF THEY WANT TO STAND BY THEIR ART AND STAND BY ENDING THEY CAN BE STARVING ARTISTS BECAUSE ILL BE OUT, NOT ANOTHER PENNY FROM ME. AND I AM SURE MANY OTHER FANS WILL LEAVE AS WELL. THEY SEEM TO HAVE LOST TOUCH SINCE DA2.
venom56321489 wrote...
I JUST FEAR BIOWARE IS HEADED TO A MORE FIRST PERSON SHOOTER GENRE. ME3 HAD LESS DIALOGUE, HAD MULTIPLAYER. AND THEIR IPAD GAME IS JUST STRAIGHT FIRST PERSON SHOOTER. THEY SEEM TO WANT TO COPY COD MORE SHOOTER, LESS STORY. BIOWARE MIGHT BE LOSING THEIR TOUCH OR SELLING OUT.
Modifié par Heliosas, 22 mars 2012 - 07:59 .
Modifié par Getorex, 22 mars 2012 - 08:03 .
Modifié par Lonestar69, 22 mars 2012 - 08:02 .
Lonestar69 wrote...
THERE IS ONLY 1 OTHER SERIES ENDING THAT WAS WORSE
KNIGHTS OF THE OLD REPUBLIC 2
Getorex wrote...
Too bad, so sad. No hope on planet Incest to be found.
venom56321489 wrote...
I AM STILL DEBATING RETURNING MY ME3. I WANT A NEW ENDING NOT JUST EXTRA EXPLANATION. IF THEY WANT TO STAND BY THEIR ART AND STAND BY ENDING THEY CAN BE STARVING ARTISTS BECAUSE ILL BE OUT, NOT ANOTHER PENNY FROM ME. AND I AM SURE MANY OTHER FANS WILL LEAVE AS WELL. THEY SEEM TO HAVE LOST TOUCH SINCE DA2.
bigstig wrote...
venom56321489 wrote...
I AM STILL DEBATING RETURNING MY ME3. I WANT A NEW ENDING NOT JUST EXTRA EXPLANATION. IF THEY WANT TO STAND BY THEIR ART AND STAND BY ENDING THEY CAN BE STARVING ARTISTS BECAUSE ILL BE OUT, NOT ANOTHER PENNY FROM ME. AND I AM SURE MANY OTHER FANS WILL LEAVE AS WELL. THEY SEEM TO HAVE LOST TOUCH SINCE DA2.
Returning the game seems like cutting off your nose to spite your face to me - yes the endings were well we know what the endings were so I won't go into it. However by returning the game you are damning yourself to that conclusion to that finish.
At least wait until April @ Pax then make up your mind
bigstig wrote...
venom56321489 wrote...
I AM STILL DEBATING RETURNING MY ME3. I WANT A NEW ENDING NOT JUST EXTRA EXPLANATION. IF THEY WANT TO STAND BY THEIR ART AND STAND BY ENDING THEY CAN BE STARVING ARTISTS BECAUSE ILL BE OUT, NOT ANOTHER PENNY FROM ME. AND I AM SURE MANY OTHER FANS WILL LEAVE AS WELL. THEY SEEM TO HAVE LOST TOUCH SINCE DA2.
Returning the game seems like cutting off your nose to spite your face to me - yes the endings were well we know what the endings were so I won't go into it. However by returning the game you are damning yourself to that conclusion to that finish.
At least wait until April @ Pax then make up your mind
corpselover wrote...
SeventyOne wrote...
A clever comment about art was made by a Gamespot commenter:
"DannyC_pt: Art doesn't end with an advertisement to buy more DLC."
That is the end of the artistic discussion...
Art also isn't sold in a compromised form in order to make a greater profit. The fact that Bioware was willing to carve out components of the game and sell them only to consumers willing to pay a greater price undermines their whole artistic integrity defense. If they are willing to sell their artistic integrity down the river themselves for a greater profit, how can we take them seriously when they try to use it as defense to not give consumers the product they promised them.
Modifié par Killjoy Cutter, 22 mars 2012 - 08:28 .