To BioWare, your response towards Retake, and how it is clear that you are not Listening.
#76
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:18
#77
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:19
812memphis wrote...
milkymcmilkerson wrote...
Also, we have to realize that at the end of the day, the Mass Effect story is their baby. I doubt the ending is ever going to completely change, but they will find a way to correct their mistakes while still making the story their own.
And when they did i can close that chapter of my life.
IF i buy something from BioWare again i will wait a week or two and wait what the Customers are saying.
If a Game like RandomFPS had a Bad Ending, i don't care that much because i spend 5-6 hours to go through the campaign, this is different.
I don't know why but i take this kind of personal, as if some one took a good and beloved memory from me
I mean, for the most of us the End is so frustrating that we don't remember the good things within the ME Series.
I remember everything good about the series, and that's why the ending is so frustrating for me.
#78
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:20
#79
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:20
IsaacShep wrote...
Just drop it already. Some of you clearly wouldn't be happy even if they sacrificed a goat to show you how much they're listening. Just whine whine whine. People criticized, they listened and DID say they WILL modify the ending. What more do you want?
Did they? What I read was that he wants us to tell our friends how awesome the game is so it will continue selling so that he can say in April, "Well, the game is still selling so obviously everyone loves it how it is."
#80
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:20
I understand if people dislike certain things more than I do but giving it 1/10, 2/10 or even 5/10 is bs, I think.
#81
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:20
Evanz wrote...
"muahahaha! peasants."
You just made me spit out my coffee onto a library table, thank you.
#82
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:22
That being said. This gives me hope for a few reasons.
1. they have said they are working on it. Great. But the battle isn't over yet. We need to keep on holding the line.
2. Even if the Indoct theory is not true ( and it is sad that the theory is only possible because of plot holes ) Bioware has an easy way out of this. Grab a hold of the indoc theory and run with it. It allows your ending to stay the same ( but with an extra mission if you pick destroy / not get indoced ) and the framework for the story is already there. ( maybe thanks to plot holes )
Anyway this gives me hope. But we can't stop. We need to keep on holding the line. Simple as that. an official statement is great, but we can't let them think we have died down.
so Keep Holding the line.
#83
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:22
scq wrote...
Yes, most critics of the ending do want more than just closure, but I will also agree with Ray that most people do love the game. I loved the game though I did not like the ending. Up until that, it was a spectacular achievement. User ratings are full of trolls and whiney "fans" who would readily one-star anything. It's not to say that it doesn't mean anything—just that it's not a very reliable indicator of how well or poorly received a game is. You may question the validity of professional reviewers, and you may even imagine the sorts of biases they may be subject to, but customer reviews are subject to their own biases which make those assessments equally if not in many cases, more unreliable.
I agree that the official statement is more of just an elaborated repeat of the "we are listening" statement. Some people here will not ever be happy until they get the exact ending they wanted and a hand delivered apology from a tearful Casey Hudson at their doorstep begging for forgiveness, but realistically, I think we should take this as a positive sign.
They aren't just trolls. There are too many one stars with very long review posts shows that they do care about the series and aren't just randomly bashing the game. Especially not at such a large volume.
Modifié par Elite Midget, 21 mars 2012 - 05:23 .
#84
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:22
Timforsgren wrote...
People are seriously overreacting, giving the game such poor scores on metacritic and Amazon. To say it's that bad is nonsense, it's just based upon the heat of anger from the ending. If you liked me1 and 2 there is no way you'd think me3 is so bad. I litarilly thought the game was perfect, and had the time of my life, until harbingers beam, best in the series for me, if you take away the ending.
I understand if people dislike certain things more than I do but giving it 1/10, 2/10 or even 5/10 is bs, I think.
Who are you to determine what others think?
#85
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:22
Stygian1 wrote...
I will say this though, BioWare, you did a great, no a fantastic job on
this game. You made me fall into this awesome universe even more. The
gameplay was great, the story was superb. I couldn't set down the
controler. But, that ending, the ending alone (5 minutes) is what is
turning your game from a 5 star GOTY to a 1 star piece of poo.
Quoted for truth. You are right, Dr. Muzyka, your game -is- well loved by critics and fans alike. But it's because we love the rest of it so much that we can't stand the way the writers amputated the ending with a rusty hacksaw. A beautiful series deserves an ending that doesn't seem cobbled together with popsicle sticks, no?
#86
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:23
IsaacShep wrote...
Just drop it already. Some of you clearly wouldn't be happy even if they sacrificed a goat to show you how much they're listening. Just whine whine whine. People criticized, they listened and DID say they WILL modify the ending. What more do you want?
Bioware didn't say it would modify the ending. It said it would clarify the ending through future DLC. That is NOT much of a commitment, and certainly no promise to provide any satisfying denouement to an otherwise excrutiatingly beautiful trilogy.
#87
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:23
Do you have problems with reading? Or do your eyes can only slectively see quotes that suit your "they don't listen!!!" bias?whydoyouwanttoknow wrote...
Did they?
"Building on their research, Exec Producer Casey Hudson and the team are hard at work on a number of game content initiatives that will help answer the questions, providing more clarity for those seeking further closure to their journey."
You can't clarify anything without adding anything new.brian_breed wrote...
Bioware didn't say it would modify the ending. It said it would clarify the ending through future DLC. That is NOT much of a commitment, and certainly no promise to provide any satisfying denouement to an otherwise excrutiatingly beautiful trilogy.
Modifié par IsaacShep, 21 mars 2012 - 05:24 .
#88
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:23
Modifié par Mvin, 21 mars 2012 - 05:24 .
#89
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:24
Timforsgren wrote...
People are seriously overreacting, giving the game such poor scores on metacritic and Amazon. To say it's that bad is nonsense, it's just based upon the heat of anger from the ending. If you liked me1 and 2 there is no way you'd think me3 is so bad. I litarilly thought the game was perfect, and had the time of my life, until harbingers beam, best in the series for me, if you take away the ending.
I understand if people dislike certain things more than I do but giving it 1/10, 2/10 or even 5/10 is bs, I think.
The story is the most important part of this game. Concluding a story of important choices with three identical endings craps on the story as well as the choices. It ruins the game.
#90
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:24
Stygian1 wrote...
*snip*
Well said.
Hold the line.
#91
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:25
IsaacShep wrote...
Do you have problems with reading? Or do your eyes can only slectively see quotes that suit your "they don't listen!!!" bias?whydoyouwanttoknow wrote...
Did they?
"Building on their research, Exec Producer Casey Hudson and the team are hard at work on a number of game content initiatives that will help answer the questions, providing more clarity for those seeking further closure to their journey."You can't clarify anything without adding anything new.brian_breed wrote...
Bioware didn't say it would modify the ending. It said it would clarify the ending through future DLC. That is NOT much of a commitment, and certainly no promise to provide any satisfying denouement to an otherwise excrutiatingly beautiful trilogy.
You said modify, not add.
#92
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:27
Any addition modifies the existing product.brian_breed wrote...
You said modify, not add.
#93
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:27
Mvin wrote...
Actually, this hits the nail on the head. I appreciate Bioware's attempts to actually do something about it, but if it's just going to be an epilogue, they're missing to point of our concerns. While there is certainly a demand for closure, this is just one aspect of the overlying problem. The ending not only bad for it's lack of closure, but also because it made all of our choices worthless and because it doesn't make sense in the slightest. There are so much more issues with it like Shepards uncharacteristic acceptance of the Star Childs options, the sudden change in tone from a heroic story to a tragic story or the absense of better options to resolve the reaper conflict (ideally with an happy ending). So as the author said: "We don't want closure to an ending like this, we want closure to an ending we love, to an ending that after we finish we can put down the control and do a fist pump in the air"
Thanks, you summed it up just as well as I ever could.
#94
Guest_Paulomedi_*
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:28
Guest_Paulomedi_*
For those who didn't see, PLEASE watch.
Please Bioware, answer us this: Why this young man addressed above has a better ending for your series than you, which worked so hard for eight years doing this game?
#95
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:29
#96
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:29
Modifié par kaidanluv, 21 mars 2012 - 06:15 .
#97
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:29
The people on Metacritic was 4chan score bombing. They openly admit to it.
#98
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:29
#99
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:29
Elite Midget wrote...
scq wrote...
Yes, most critics of the ending do want more than just closure, but I will also agree with Ray that most people do love the game. I loved the game though I did not like the ending. Up until that, it was a spectacular achievement. User ratings are full of trolls and whiney "fans" who would readily one-star anything. It's not to say that it doesn't mean anything—just that it's not a very reliable indicator of how well or poorly received a game is. You may question the validity of professional reviewers, and you may even imagine the sorts of biases they may be subject to, but customer reviews are subject to their own biases which make those assessments equally if not in many cases, more unreliable.
I agree that the official statement is more of just an elaborated repeat of the "we are listening" statement. Some people here will not ever be happy until they get the exact ending they wanted and a hand delivered apology from a tearful Casey Hudson at their doorstep begging for forgiveness, but realistically, I think we should take this as a positive sign.
They aren't just trolls. There are too many one stars with very long review posts shows that they do care about the series and aren't just randomly bashing the game. Especially not at such a large volume.
One starring is an extreme measure and I don't think that accurately reflects the game either. It is certainly my opinion and theirs as well, but how many people, though upset with the ending, could really give ME3 one star and one star only? Maybe 6 or 7 out of 10, but to say it's 1 star is to say it was garbage and unplayable. If they found the game to be so, fair assessment, and while the ending is supremely important, I doubt it turns an otherwise near-perfect game into something you would pay someone to avoid.
#100
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 05:30





Retour en haut




