co-founder responds to the fans
#1
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 06:58
Okay i dont know if you've seen this but what can you make of it. I've read to the part where he says and this a quote:
Building on their research, Exec Producer
Casey Hudson and the team are hard at work on a number of game content
initiatives that will help answer the questions, providing more clarity
for those seeking further closure to their journey. You’ll hear more on
this in April.
#2
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 06:58
#3
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 07:03
#4
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 07:07
Modifié par moviebuff3000, 21 mars 2012 - 07:07 .
#5
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 07:13
#6
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 07:15
#7
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 07:18
#8
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 07:21
It pleases me to know they're taking this issue to heart and aren't going off half cocked. I like that bit about responding in a timely manner, rushing some garbage out the door is NEVER a good idea.
#9
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 07:24
#10
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 07:43
#12
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 08:21
#13
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 08:31
no multiplayer at all and a truly super cool epic ending/conclusion to the mass effect series that actually takes into account your choices you made i think ppl would vote for NO MULTIPLAYER.
i think mass effect 3 is where single player story is hurt by having multiplayer. you cant deny that many games have their single player take the backroad to multiplayer. and more effort is put into the multiplayer. mas effect has always been a single player game. and now that i see how the ending turned out. i wonder what would have happened if their was no multiplayer. oh they wouold have a good ending and no one would be complaining.
#14
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 08:40
ragnorok87 wrote...
multiplayer i could care less about. i think most fans would agree that if they had the choice between having the multiplayer as we have now coupled with the terrible mass effect 3 endings OR
no multiplayer at all and a truly super cool epic ending/conclusion to the mass effect series that actually takes into account your choices you made i think ppl would vote for NO MULTIPLAYER.
i think mass effect 3 is where single player story is hurt by having multiplayer. you cant deny that many games have their single player take the backroad to multiplayer. and more effort is put into the multiplayer. mas effect has always been a single player game. and now that i see how the ending turned out. i wonder what would have happened if their was no multiplayer. oh they wouold have a good ending and no one would be complaining.
I agree with this i'd rather have a solid ending than a multiplayer
#15
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 08:53
#16
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:09
Iodine wrote...
Fortunately, multiplayer having been made by a completely different team from those working on the single player campaign/story, it did not detract from the single player or influence the ending. The only connection whatsoever is having the loosely tied-in option for multiplayer instead of endless sidequests and scanning. So the multiplayer is a nice bonus to give ME fans a little extra unique fun and longevity for their beloved series, and in no way to blame for the ending.
^This , the multiplayer has been well received and is quite fun to play.I really don't think MP affected the ending also , it may have been a case of trying to be too intellectual/clever and cutting needed content that would have made the ending make sense.
Modifié par LOST SPARTANJLC, 22 mars 2012 - 12:09 .





Retour en haut






