I don't feel any regret when I kick you from a gold game.
#51
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:31
#52
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:32
KiraTsukasa wrote...
Highlord Heian wrote...
Being top of the leaderboard just means you're targeting score more than team success.
Or you had to carry your team because they were worth less than a small pile of dirt.
If you think score equals performance, then I have serious doubts you carrying any team at any level of difficulty.
#53
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:35
DRUNK_CANADIAN wrote...
Yes I'm talking to you mr N7 rating <50 and trying with a character at level 15 or less and rocking your crappy SMG or Mantis on a class it just doesn't belong.
I seriously don't see why certain people even try to do gold with terrible gear/characters/experience.
I've seen players with level 20 characters and N7 rating higher than 100 and still fail at gold miserably.
(1) There's nothing wrong with N7 rating under 50. Lower N7 rating =/= bad player. I wouldn't trust anyone under 20 though.
(2) Nothing wrong with a level 15 character. Too much less though, and you might have a problem
(3) Yeah... anyone with crappy gear needs to get out
#54
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:36
RazRei wrote...
QuantumSheep13 wrote...
The amount of elitism that goes on in this game's multiplayer is ridiculous.
And it's a Co-Op game too.
from all my years in gaming i found that Co-op brings out the worst when it comes to elitism. its probably because its more passive than competitive. in competitive its kind of easy to see who is good and who isnt. its a little harder to prove you are better than somebody else when you are on the same team so people try a little more than they should.
its sad, but thats the ugly side of Co-op. i still wouldnt trade it for PvP or competitive MP though.
#55
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:40
#56
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:41
KroganSmash wrote...
I'd rather have this piles if dirt then an ignorant cocky "know it all" any day it's just a game. Big deal...KiraTsukasa wrote...
Highlord Heian wrote...
Being top of the leaderboard just means you're targeting score more than team success.
Or you had to carry your team because they were worth less than a small pile of dirt.
Someone is so immature, quite ironic, but I suppose it explains your panty comment.
#57
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:41
kieran.me wrote...
i'll kick you because
you're less then N7 80
if i do not think you're weapon combinations don't suit your class
you're playing a weapons focused class under level 18 or a tech/biotic class under 15
your class doesn't complement what we already have or wish to get
and this is why i rarely fail gold with pugs
Really? I can understand the other ones, but kicking someone because they're using combinations you don't agree with, sorry not everyone likes to play the way you do.
Thats probably the lamest reason to kick someone i've ever seen.
#58
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:42
I can no longer tolerate the elitism in the Bungie, 343i, and Epic games forums, I thought this forum was safe from this type of behavior. Now with the added MP, They are crawling out of everywhere and it is sad.Lionheartwolf wrote...
RazRei wrote...
QuantumSheep13 wrote...
The amount of elitism that goes on in this game's multiplayer is ridiculous.
And it's a Co-Op game too.
from all my years in gaming i found that Co-op brings out the worst when it comes to elitism. its probably because its more passive than competitive. in competitive its kind of easy to see who is good and who isnt. its a little harder to prove you are better than somebody else when you are on the same team so people try a little more than they should.
its sad, but thats the ugly side of Co-op. i still wouldnt trade it for PvP or competitive MP though.
#59
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:45
DRUNK_CANADIAN wrote...
Yes I'm talking to you mr N7 rating <50 and trying with a character at level 15 or less and rocking your crappy SMG or Mantis on a class it just doesn't belong.
A high level mantis can be a great gun for just about any class.
#60
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:47
We rocked Gold 3 times in a row on 3 different maps. With an average time of 30 minutes. Which is not bad at all seeing as they had no "Ultra rare" guns. One of them only had a Katana & Carnifex.
It all depends on what class/how skilled players are.
Modifié par Drummernate, 22 mars 2012 - 12:48 .
#61
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:49
TexasToast712 wrote...
I can no longer tolerate the elitism in the Bungie, 343i, and Epic games forums, I thought this forum was safe from this type of behavior. Now with the added MP, They are crawling out of everywhere and it is sad.Lionheartwolf wrote...
RazRei wrote...
QuantumSheep13 wrote...
The amount of elitism that goes on in this game's multiplayer is ridiculous.
And it's a Co-Op game too.
from all my years in gaming i found that Co-op brings out the worst when it comes to elitism. its probably because its more passive than competitive. in competitive its kind of easy to see who is good and who isnt. its a little harder to prove you are better than somebody else when you are on the same team so people try a little more than they should.
its sad, but thats the ugly side of Co-op. i still wouldnt trade it for PvP or competitive MP though.
Totally agree....
Epic Games the only thing is the whole Gnasher > Everything deal... which is true but people don't need to keep stating it!
#62
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:49
TexasToast712 wrote...
I can no longer tolerate the elitism in the Bungie, 343i, and Epic games forums, I thought this forum was safe from this type of behavior. Now with the added MP, They are crawling out of everywhere and it is sad.Lionheartwolf wrote...
RazRei wrote...
QuantumSheep13 wrote...
The amount of elitism that goes on in this game's multiplayer is ridiculous.
And it's a Co-Op game too.
from all my years in gaming i found that Co-op brings out the worst when it comes to elitism. its probably because its more passive than competitive. in competitive its kind of easy to see who is good and who isnt. its a little harder to prove you are better than somebody else when you are on the same team so people try a little more than they should.
its sad, but thats the ugly side of Co-op. i still wouldnt trade it for PvP or competitive MP though.
i dont think either one of us would be suprised to find out they are going in the same direction as you.
#63
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:49
you mad?DRUNK_CANADIAN wrote...
KroganSmash wrote...
I'd rather have this piles if dirt then an ignorant cocky "know it all" any day it's just a game. Big deal...KiraTsukasa wrote...
Highlord Heian wrote...
Being top of the leaderboard just means you're targeting score more than team success.
Or you had to carry your team because they were worth less than a small pile of dirt.
Someone is so immature, quite ironic, but I suppose it explains your panty comment.
#64
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:50
Drummernate wrote...
Had a random team with a Total N7 rating of about 450... with 240 of it coming from me.
We rocked Gold 3 times in a row on 3 different maps. With an average time of 30 minutes. Which is not bad at all seeing as they had no "Ultra rare" guns. One of them only had a Katana & Carnifex.
It all depends on what class/how skilled players are.
You don't need a black widow to beat gold
#65
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:50
#66
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:51
KroganSmash wrote...
you mad?DRUNK_CANADIAN wrote...
KroganSmash wrote...
I'd rather have this piles if dirt then an ignorant cocky "know it all" any day it's just a game. Big deal...KiraTsukasa wrote...
Highlord Heian wrote...
Being top of the leaderboard just means you're targeting score more than team success.
Or you had to carry your team because they were worth less than a small pile of dirt.
Someone is so immature, quite ironic, but I suppose it explains your panty comment.
Nope.avi
But you are. Keep the petty insults coming, you can start it I'll finish it.
Or in your immature dialect "COME AT ME BRO"
#67
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:51
You can tell who 90% of the Elitists are by their join date.Lionheartwolf wrote...
TexasToast712 wrote...
I can no longer tolerate the elitism in the Bungie, 343i, and Epic games forums, I thought this forum was safe from this type of behavior. Now with the added MP, They are crawling out of everywhere and it is sad.Lionheartwolf wrote...
RazRei wrote...
QuantumSheep13 wrote...
The amount of elitism that goes on in this game's multiplayer is ridiculous.
And it's a Co-Op game too.
from all my years in gaming i found that Co-op brings out the worst when it comes to elitism. its probably because its more passive than competitive. in competitive its kind of easy to see who is good and who isnt. its a little harder to prove you are better than somebody else when you are on the same team so people try a little more than they should.
its sad, but thats the ugly side of Co-op. i still wouldnt trade it for PvP or competitive MP though.
i dont think either one of us would be suprised to find out they are going in the same direction as you.
#68
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:52
frustratemyself wrote...
So much rage, I really don't understand.
THERE I FOUND IT. that was the ironic statement i was looking for.
you're pandering to me arent you?
#69
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:53
Its not the set up that matters, its how they use it
#70
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:53
A level 20 character with 20 N7 rating and decent equipment can be just as great a player, if the said person simply feels no need to play any other class. He could have played the MP for over 200 hours since release and knocked down Gold matches on all maps, but he'd still only have an N7 rating of 20. Of course, that's a rare example, since it's pretty unlikely for anyone to get an Asari Adept, Salarian Infiltrator or some other useful character in their first starter pack.
Modifié par GhoXen, 22 mars 2012 - 12:55 .
#71
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:54
Not gonna argue with you believe what you want lol
#72
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:57
Lionheartwolf wrote...
frustratemyself wrote...
So much rage, I really don't understand.
THERE I FOUND IT. that was the ironic statement i was looking for.
you're pandering to me arent you?
Absolutely, was just waiting for the right moment
#73
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 01:09
IonSilverbolt wrote...
You could always tell them nicely what they're doing wrong over the mic before kicking them. A lot of these players are new to MP as well since this a first for the Mass Effect series. Also, some just might stumble in hoping to boost their galactic readiness and not knowing how tough gold is.
I try to explain to people why they need to back out and play bronze or maybe even silver but when they don't have a mic in or there in there own party, i don't feel bad booting them
#74
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 01:25
.tallinn wrote...
A remark about N7 ratings. Do not value them too high. I have a N7 rating of around 58, but that is for experience derived from buying packs. I never played any other char then my two soldiers G.I. Joe und G.I. Jane. I created some more chars to see what skills and properties they have. I have a level 14 krogan sentinel I never played but he adds to my N7 rating.
See thats the thing. You feel that your ready to play gold because you have a level 20 soldier that you do very well with and you've played around with a few characters. I personally would say your not ready. If your the last guy left alive in a gold match, your level 20 soldier that you have all this experience using, isn't going to survive. I've beaten gold about 50 times (not counting losses) and know that it would take a miracle for a soldier to survive a round on it's own. And thats just a regular round, an objective round is so much harder. Unless your playing with a group of strong friends that play gold all the time, you shouldn't go into a gold match with a character unlesss you kno you can survive a round when your teamates all die. By jumpin into gold with a character that can't do that, your forcing the rest of the team to carry you through the match. Personally I'm tired of carrying players who are not ready through gold. it's unfair
#75
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 01:34
Someone actually felt the need to make this topic or that it has 3 pages worth of replies





Retour en haut






