So do you think the retake movement was worth it?
#51
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 11:56
#52
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 11:58
Simpfan wrote...
I find it a little sad that the only reason you raised money for sick kids was because you hated a video game ending.
If the ending was perfectly fine, would these kids have still gotten all your money?
I've always given money to charity and taken part in charity events etc, so for me personally yes I would have still donated. However, I dare say some people out there did do it for selfish reasons which is undoubtedly shameful.
#53
Posté 21 mars 2012 - 11:59
The first part of my continued feedback is "we want more than closure, we'd like a wide variety of endings".
#54
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:02
#55
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:02
Simpfan wrote...
I find it a little sad that the only reason you raised money for sick kids was because you hated a video game ending.
If the ending was perfectly fine, would these kids have still gotten all your money?
Considering The store I shop at always has some sort of drive going I would say yes.
It wouldn't have gone to childs play but it would have gone to something else.
Modifié par Cody211282, 22 mars 2012 - 12:05 .
#56
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:03
For a gaming community like ours to finally take a stand and succeed is a mark in gaming history. BioWare just changed the rules. I came into this movement remembering how developers hardly make changes based on fan input, especially game changing ones.
Thank you BioWare. You didn't conpromise what your company stood for, and stood true to your missions statement. You have my graditude and respect.
#57
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:06
#58
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:07
MintyCool wrote...
TLK Spires wrote...
what the hell are you talking about? it isn't over until it's over. nothing's been done *at all*, only slight hints at possibilities. it will have been worth it when something is *done*.
until then, i hold the line.
The public is agaisnt you. The media is agaisnt you. The Dev's feel you are entitled.
You lost: social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/9870213/1
Trololololol
#59
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:08
HighScore 2600 wrote...
Definetly worth it to a veteran gamer like myself. Some of you may not understand what truly was achieved here, but to a Halo fan it makes a battle that was finally won for gamers. Back when Halo: Reach was released there was a strong outcry to change certain aspects about the gameplay that went unheard, and was not changed until the developer changed hats.
For a gaming community like ours to finally take a stand and succeed is a mark in gaming history. BioWare just changed the rules. I came into this movement remembering how developers hardly make changes based on fan input, especially game changing ones.
Thank you BioWare. You didn't conpromise what your company stood for, and stood true to your missions statement. You have my graditude and respect.
We haven't done anything, Bioware is just adding to what is there and are completely ignoring the issue. Really, it's that easy for you to give them graditude and respect already? Nothing has been released yet and the statement made by Bioware was one of the worst i have ever read within the gaming community. Insulting even.
Modifié par Scoob, 22 mars 2012 - 12:08 .
#60
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:09
#61
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:11
Good outcomes from the movement have already been achieved: The goal has not.
#62
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:14
#63
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:15
"Totally worth it"
#64
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:18
#65
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:18
#66
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:28
#67
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:30
#68
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:32
#69
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:35
Modifié par Lanay, 22 mars 2012 - 12:35 .
#70
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:35
#71
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:35
#72
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:43
It is awesome fighting the good fight with all of you!
Hold the Line! The fat lady has not sung yet!
#73
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:45
I think you have the wrong tense. Yes it is worth it and if a charity made money then cool.
Who thinks Minty looks sooo cute trying to start that flame?
Minty I do believe there are several Forbes articles you need to read.
#74
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 12:46
#75
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 01:03
Because the retake movement wants certain things addressed before the ending is considered "fixed".
A) StarChild:
makes no sense, since it wasn't dropped or hinted at in any of the previous games, the "Catalyst" needs to be something that was foreshadowed previously.
Shepard needs to have acted in accordance to the way his character has acted previously, this would go along way to the believability of any ending, even if shepard dies, we need to understand and believe this is something out shepard would do.
C) Character epilogue:
We would like to know what happened to our characters, If Shepard is going to sacrifice himself, we would like to know that it wasn't in vain and worth it. Especially in regards to my next point.
C) NOT DESTROYING THE MASS RELAYS!!!!:
I cannot stress this enough, part of what made this ending SO bad was the destruction of the mass relays, and stranding people and condemning them to a galactic holocaust of starvation, disease and death. With the reapers having torn up the majority of the galaxy, and no relays, this pretty much has destroyed galactic civilization, and pretty much the reapers win in any case. I think out of all these points, this is the one that needs to be reversed no matter what, because at least with the relays people can rebuild, and more importantly Bioware can have the option of making new games in the ME universe, especially the MMO they are interested in making. WithOUT the relays, this is impossible, and I don't know WHY Bioware hasn't realized this.
*After reviewing the video of both arrival AND the ending to ME3, I am very certain that the explosions were NOT Arrival style Nova explosions destroying the star systems. THe only deaths caused by those explosions would be what ever effect the "Cruicible" wave has depending on your EMS.
-Æ





Retour en haut






