88 réponses à ce sujet

[ElectronicPostingInterface]

I would have picked "indifferent" if it was an option.

[SharlenaSharlena]

Yeah Harbinger was mysteriously absent from this game wth?

[Malanek]

It doesn't need to. Only if appropriate given the content.

[idunhavaname]

I don't know. Human Collector was more stressful (insanity) than fun tbh. If there would be one I would choose Harbinger though. I like TIM as the fallen hero type of guy.

[xsdob]

People complained that ME2 had a boss fight with a reaper. They remove it, and now that same fanbase demands they put a reaper boss fight in?

i don't get this fanbase at all.

[Crazeegamer]

Harbinger sees like a no brainer.,. But since they wil still create content idk, i'd be fine without a fight or at least let me fight the illusive man.

[Senario]

We need more Harbinger, I've developed some sort of affection for him as a bad guy because of two lolz. Always egging me on, made me feel like collector fights were so much more important than just "Oh there's an enemy shoot him". Harby...why don't you speak to me ):

[Sailears]

Unnecessary.
I really dislike contrived "boss" fights, which just go to remind you its all a game.

ONLY if it fits in with the flow of the ending, then maybe I would say yes.

Human reaper was horrible. Sovereign/Saren wasn't that great (but the part before with Saren only was very good).

[Noatz]

The_Crazy_Hand wrote...

Well unfortunately the reason given was that it was too "video-gamey", can't say I agree with the logic of removing stuff from video games for being video game like.

Their language was poorly chosen, but I think what they were trying to convey is that a boss fight with TIM would have felt contrived, or did feel contrived to them (they had it implemeted after all). A confrontation via dialogue feels more appropriate.

Right now it's probably not being payed much mind, but if we show them that it can help sell the ending DLC, should it come, then it's certainly possible.  No reason not to at least ask.  The worst will get is a "no, just an ending fix, sorry".

True enough.

Modifié par Noatz, 22 mars 2012 - 12:14 .

[The_Crazy_Hand]

MaYtriX wrote...

How about the CHOICE for a boss fight?
A renegade option to be taken if you don't want it, inactivity if you do.

If I had a say in implementation, I'd say make it exclusive to an ultimate, happy ending where you tell the catalyst to **** off as your immense EMS decimates the reapers, and face an angry Harbinger as a final obstacle to said ultimate ending.

But, eh, it'll be great to at least have the fight happen.

[Leafs43]

xsdob wrote...

People complained that ME2 had a boss fight with a reaper. They remove it, and now that same fanbase demands they put a reaper boss fight in?

i don't get this fanbase at all.

I think most people thought the human reaper was fine.

I think what they didn't like is that it was the final boss and the ending to ME2 left so much open and followed by a huge ****tease with the reapers in dark space.

[The_Crazy_Hand]

xsdob wrote...

People complained that ME2 had a boss fight with a reaper. They remove it, and now that same fanbase demands they put a reaper boss fight in?

i don't get this fanbase at all.

Well, I can say I, for one, did NOT complain, and found it very climactic and satifying.  Sure you fight it with just guns, but it WAS just an embryo.

[darknessmyown]

I don't feel it would be required, but I am all for getting to bring Harbinger down myself in the game for all he has been part of in the series.

[goose2989]

Ok, now we really are asking for too much, especially when so many people still expect a quality Ending DLC for free.

Yea, it would have been more fun with a boss fight, but what's more important? Getting your chance to see Shepard and his/her Love Interest retire together, with Mass Relays, or asking for too many small things?

[DaosX]

Remember Fallout (the original)? The "endboss" was extremely clever and done perfectly. It's times like those that makes the whole concept of having an end boss obsolete.

[GDK]

I voted for Harby. But at the very least, he needs LINES in this game.

[The_Crazy_Hand]

goose2989 wrote...

Ok, now we really are asking for too much, especially when so many people still expect a quality Ending DLC for free.

Yea, it would have been more fun with a boss fight, but what's more important? Getting your chance to see Shepard and his/her Love Interest retire together, with Mass Relays, or asking for too many small things?

Realistically, it won't happen for free.  I would indeed rather see just the endings fixed than nothing.  But if we don't ask, we won't get.  As I said, the worst we will hear is simply a no, what's wrong with just posing the point?

[MacabreMilkman]

 HELL NO! BioWare will never come close to topping Marauder Shields. Never.

[Bantz]

I want an expanded battle with Mr. Shields. Maybe a hand to hand combat sequence where he explains that he is the guardian of the space magic wielding starchild.

[DLClol]

usmack5 wrote...

Harby: will never be as bad*ss as Sovereign, but a worthy foe in a final boss fight.

Its like confirmed in the codex harby is the biggest/toughest one.

[shnellegaming]

I want to see Harbringer blow up.

[Bantz]

honestly though yes I'd like a final boss even if it does make my video game seem a bit video gamey.

[pika9519]

Mims wrote...

NEED MOAR HARBINGER.

Don't care about boss fighting, but it wouldn't be bad either.

I actually sorta missed him. 

[Shavyer]

that would be brilliant, that's worth paying for