415 réponses à ce sujet

[Giskler]

Remove everything after the beam and redo it or go with the indoctrination theory.

[daguest]

remove everything after anderson death. Insert new ending from here.

[Singu]

Because the fans really loved the human reaper in ME2 they should do the following:

Neo Synthesis: Shepard leaps into the blue beam. The entire superstructure of the Crucible/Citadel is dissolved into tiny blue sparks that reassemble themselves into a 50 km long human reaper shaped like your femshep/maleshep in his/her N7 armor. He/she turns around towards the remaining reapers and says <<MY TURN>> - then screen goes black into end credit. Edit : OK-OK, I know sound doesn't carry through vacuum, but other than that it would be perfect!

Modifié par Singu, 22 mars 2012 - 08:26 .

[Rune-Chan]

All of them. They are all poor for nearly identical reasons.

If they want to fix it, they need to rewrite how the crucible/catalyst works.

[linsanity]

synthesis makes NOOOOOOO sense frikin space magic

[captainbob8383]

Synthesis is an abberation, a total contradiction with the whole series.
Mass Effect is about self determination, free will, diversity.
Synthesis just ruins this vision and is basically what Saren wanted in Mass Effect 1.

By choosing synthesis Shepard denies what he fought against in ME1 and become a dictator that wipe universe diversity.
This ending makes NO SENSE, the guy who came up with that idea never played any Mass Effect.

This ending is easily the worst but by the way the other ones are also in total contradiction with the saga.
Each one is the perfect opposite of a main ME theme:

Control:  ME2/ME3 antagonist way of thinking: The Illusive Man.
Synthesis:  ME1 antagonist way of thinking: Saren
Destroy: In ME3 the galaxy main enemy is itself, we fight against the racial prejudices between races. The point of the game is to unite the races despite their differences. This ending just negates that: organics and synthetics will never go along, we must genocide the latter.

I understand why some people want to believe in the indoctrination theory, it's like Bioware purposely made the opposite of what they should have done. It is really sickening.

Modifié par captainbob8383, 22 mars 2012 - 08:34 .

[Zalitara]

I'd let them remove all 3 if it got me just 1 good one...

[Aramintai]

All of them, but most of all - Synthesis. This one is completely out of place.

[whydoyouwanttoknow]

Remove one of the endings............ um........ I'd remove the only ending we got. That one.

[earthonline]

seems like so far Synthesis is the one Bioware needs to remove to put in new ending?

[Nykara]

earthonline wrote...

If Bioware said that the only way to put new ending (since in Citadel there are only three roads Shepard can take so there cant be more than 3 choices) is to remove a existing choice, which one would you remove?

Control?
Destroy?
Synthesis?

For reference, here is list of all endings:
ME3 Endings Choices List 

Any of them! To be honest I couldnt care less so long as we got a decent replacement

[Xandurpein]

Synthesis is just... space magic. It's illogical and make no sense at all.

[Iwillbeback]

What? There is only one ending.

Even if you removed one of the color choices, you still only get two endings.

Modifié par Iwillbeback, 22 mars 2012 - 09:31 .

[Ariq007]

I vote Synthesis. Makes no real sense scientifically, and is a horrible philosophy (if only we were all the same, then we'd have peace!....lol).

[Nefelius]

Since the endings differ only with color and it's "Name" I'd say simply remove THE ending.

[Verethele]

I'm just really glad that most people are also saying synthesis and pointing out the reasons why that option is not morally good. It makes me feel better about the world. Thank you, people.

[Irx]

Destroy and Control have exactly the same consequences for the galaxy.
Synthesis is just stupid.
I'd remove synthesis altogether and extensively change the other two.

[hector7rau]

Starchild ending...
:trollface:

[webrakefornobody]

Synthesis, that one came out of nowhere.

[Costello_Anasazi]

All of them, I would remove that stupid child. The Dreams through the game which have me running after him for no reason and the plot hole created by the citidal being on the reapers side. It made ME1 seem pointless as the citidel should have summoned the reapers without Soverign and more than that it should have summoned them in ME3 rather than finding a back road into the galaxy.

Failing that yeah Synthesis.

Shepard is already part machine so its nothing new and shouldn't have been required.

[Takamori The Templar]

Well I'm colorblind , so technically you are removing all the endings.
Welp.

[Rabid Rooster]

ThePanzer99 wrote...

The one we're all the decisions you've made in three games lead up to a galactic dark age and likely extinction event for some species and leave your squadmates stranded on another planet.

This

[Brawne]

Everything after Shep and Anderson sitting there at the end.

[Erield]

I dunno which one I'd remove.  Blue and red are two of my favorite colors, but I'm also a big fan of green.

Blue makes the most logical sense.  Green makes a little bit of sense, if you pretend they're nanites.  Red is pure space magic.




I guess I'd say that if I was forced to choose, to just eliminate the Star Child.

[Tazzmission]

Xandurpein wrote...

Synthesis is just... space magic. It's illogical and make no sense at all.

how so?



because you do get to play god basicly


can you honestly say you were never tempted to try to do so?


i mean seriously creating a new dna framework and entering the final evolutionary stage is a bad thing?

im not one whos fan of religion but sythesis does give you that god like abilty though

Modifié par Tazzmission, 22 mars 2012 - 10:34 .