Synthesis... Far out of place! Also, it bothers me that you have to get a certain amount of war assets to earn it... Seriously? This is one of the few games I have to put effort to get one of the worst endings it offers!
If Bioware told you they had to REMOVE one of the endings in order to replace with new one, which one would you remove?
Débuté par
earthonline
, mars 21 2012 11:54
#376
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 01:47
#377
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 01:48
All 3. Cut that entire sequence with space jimmy and do it over.
#378
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 01:50
I'd have either Synthesis or Control removed.
In Destroy, the reapers fall down.
In Synthesis and Control, they "rewind" back to space.
Otherwise they are the same besides the colors and who walks off the Normandy.
In Destroy, the reapers fall down.
In Synthesis and Control, they "rewind" back to space.
Otherwise they are the same besides the colors and who walks off the Normandy.
#379
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 01:50
earthonline wrote...
If Bioware said that the only way to put new ending (since in Citadel there are only three roads Shepard can take so there cant be more than 3 choices) is to remove a existing choice, which one would you remove?
Control?
Destroy?
Synthesis?
For reference, here is list of all endings:
ME3 Endings Choices List
synthesis. half synthetic / half organic? seriously? wtf were they smoking?
#380
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 01:51
synthesis should be removed. It has already been visited in ME 1, and was shown to be a bad thing for everyone involved.
#381
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 01:54
synthesis, control/destroy can be seen as plausible but synthesis is pure space magic imo
#382
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 03:39
If I had to pick one of the three to be removed it would be Synthesis. IMO That variant is so ridiculous that it turns Mass Effect from space-opera-SF into pure Fantasy.
#383
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:24
how about if they said that they cannot remove synthesis, and told you to choose between removing control or removing destroy? which would you choose than?
#384
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:25
If they removed one... wouldnt it be the only ending cus they were all the same?
#385
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:26
earthonline wrote...
how about if they said that they cannot remove synthesis, and told you to choose between removing control or removing destroy? which would you choose than?
They're all the same ending.
But, to actually answer that question, I'd remove control between the two. Destroy is the only choice that made sense to me because it was the point of the whole trilogy. The Illusive Man tried to control, and look what it did to him. Who's to say that Shepard is immune to that kind of corruption?
#386
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:30
green, hate space magic
#387
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:32
If I had to remove one ending, I'd remove the ending they gave us. ಠ_ಠ
#388
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:52
Control ending. Because synthesis has the greatest explanation of all time "Just throw yourself into the crucible's beam and all beings become both synthetic and organic *child attempts not to insert troll face*" And destruction just makes you feel good about taking everything you can with you (unless if you "live")
#389
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:07
Synthesis. That ending made the least sense both logically and thematically.
#390
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:08
Synthesis, it's the most silly.
#391
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:09
I wish I could get rid of the whole sequence. If I only got to remove one though, its easy. Synthesis.
I hated godchild and his reasoning, but synthesis explanation is when the game really jumped the shark for me (and sadly only got worse).
I hated godchild and his reasoning, but synthesis explanation is when the game really jumped the shark for me (and sadly only got worse).
#392
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:10
Blue.
#393
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:10
Synthesis.
It's the ultimate in plot holes, space magic, ignoring the themes (coming together, overcoming differences), ignoring the reality (Geth and Quarians holding hands) plus it makes you accept terrible, terrible RGC logic and then, even worse, has you essentially doing the Reaper's job for them ON A GALAXY WIDE SCALE.
Synthesis = a dark lord amongst terrible endings.
Edit: But let's be honest - I hate them all.
It's the ultimate in plot holes, space magic, ignoring the themes (coming together, overcoming differences), ignoring the reality (Geth and Quarians holding hands) plus it makes you accept terrible, terrible RGC logic and then, even worse, has you essentially doing the Reaper's job for them ON A GALAXY WIDE SCALE.
Synthesis = a dark lord amongst terrible endings.
Edit: But let's be honest - I hate them all.
Modifié par TurambarEA, 23 mars 2012 - 06:12 .
#394
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:12
D1ck1e wrote...
Indoctrination doesn't require any removal does it?
It just requires you to know which one breaks the hold
#395
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:12
"Synthesis" is ridiculous.
But not as ridiculous as the god child and his "solution."
But not as ridiculous as the god child and his "solution."
#396
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:13
Destroy, it just takes too much from the universe, that being AI.
#397
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:37
I would have them all removed... hell if they do not want to fix the ending... just roll the end credits once the beam hits you... still a better ending!
#398
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:39
I would say scrap all of them & start with a clean slate, if that was the case
#399
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:40
Synthesis is ridiculous. You can't just randomly introduce that in your ending, ugh.
#400
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:43
Synthesis or everything with the ReaperGodChild.





Retour en haut





