Aller au contenu

Photo

If Bioware told you they had to REMOVE one of the endings in order to replace with new one, which one would you remove?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
415 réponses à ce sujet

#76
jarms48

jarms48
  • Members
  • 291 messages
Synthesis, because that gambling AI from Mass Effect 1 said the only way it will end is if organics could control or destroy all synthetics. How right it was, that unit had a soul. :P

Holding the Line

Modifié par jarms48, 22 mars 2012 - 01:06 .


#77
irishScott3

irishScott3
  • Members
  • 447 messages
Synthesis. Destroying the reapers at least makes sense (that's been the primary ojbective from the start) and controlling them is an established plot point. At least in isolation of the current endings.

#78
Element Zero

Element Zero
  • Members
  • 1 748 messages
I'd remove the one with the Starchild. ;)

Since we are pretending there are differing endings, I'll go with synthesis. It is completely out of place, and the least plausible.

Modifié par tallrickruush, 22 mars 2012 - 01:16 .


#79
cyrrant

cyrrant
  • Members
  • 436 messages

earthonline wrote...

If Bioware said that the only way to put new ending (since in Citadel there are only three roads Shepard can take so there cant be more than 3 choices) is to remove a existing choice, which one would you remove?

Control?
Destroy?
Synthesis?

For reference, here is list of all endings:
ME3 Endings Choices List 


All of them.  Just chop it right off after Marauder Shields and start again.

If I had to choose, Synthesis.  Forcing such a drastic change on everyone in the galaxy?  It feels abhorrent to me.

#80
The Smitchens

The Smitchens
  • Members
  • 771 messages
How can you remove one without removing all of them by extension?

#81
Danilo Luis

Danilo Luis
  • Members
  • 101 messages
synthesis

#82
luferndes

luferndes
  • Members
  • 15 messages
Implying there's more than one ending?

#83
XJ347

XJ347
  • Members
  • 160 messages
It is all the same ending!

Seriously... Just different colors. They all need to be scrapped.

#84
Fdmatt

Fdmatt
  • Members
  • 118 messages
Hmmm tough choices

Control - What TIM wanted, apparently the Paragon option. Shep dies (kinda). Mass Relays destroyed.

Synthesis - Nonsensical space magic oddly reminiscent of what Saren wanted in ME1. I told him to go screw, how come I couldn't tell Space Baby to do the same. Mass Relays destroyed. Shep dies (I think? This ending makes no sense, does Shepard become the Force?)

Destroy - Be a giant hypocrite and commit genocide against a race you just helped solve a 300 year old conflict with. Mass Relays destroyed. Shep lives? Apparently Renegade.

Can I give them all away?

#85
LadyWench

LadyWench
  • Members
  • 689 messages

Fdmatt wrote...

This ending makes no sense, does Shepard become the Force?


YES. Midichlorians! It's been midiclorians all along, I can't believe I didn't see this sooner. :blink:

#86
Stygian1

Stygian1
  • Members
  • 1 284 messages

nhsknudsen wrote...

Synthesis make about as much sense as travelling into the core of the Earth and discovering dinosaurs. It might have been a fantastic ending in the 50'ies... But not today.



#87
Thornquist

Thornquist
  • Members
  • 448 messages
Synthesis.

But I dont think they should remove anything.

#88
WarBaby2

WarBaby2
  • Members
  • 1 019 messages
All of them...

#89
Arcamenel

Arcamenel
  • Members
  • 155 messages

Andur4 wrote...

All of them, because their the same ending.

Jokes aside, I'd say Synthesis. It makes the least amount of sense out of all of them.


we're thinking the same....which is sad

#90
blackangel209

blackangel209
  • Members
  • 134 messages
There's more than 1?

Seriously though, Synthesis can go rot in a hole.

Modifié par blackangel209, 22 mars 2012 - 01:49 .


#91
Athlonis1

Athlonis1
  • Members
  • 267 messages
There is only one ending...

But I'd say get rid of the green explosion. I like the color green and don't want it associated with those "endings".

#92
movieguyabw

movieguyabw
  • Members
  • 1 723 messages
Synthesis, because it's never been hinted at that such a thing was possible on a massive scale.

I wouldn't mind it staying at all, but I feel there needs to be more of a buildup and foreshadow of this ending for it to work. Regardless, there needs to be more choices and more endings.

#93
LadyofRivendell

LadyofRivendell
  • Members
  • 2 707 messages
Synthesis. It's a nice curveball, but it's totally unexpected, unexplained, and doesn't add much to anything.

#94
earthonline

earthonline
  • Members
  • 301 messages
to all those saying synthesis, isnt that the most interesting one though?

#95
gmboy902

gmboy902
  • Members
  • 1 144 messages
Wait, there's more than one ending?

#96
HeroicHare

HeroicHare
  • Members
  • 69 messages
Toss the starchild.... failing that toss the synthesis

#97
Vromrig

Vromrig
  • Members
  • 621 messages

earthonline wrote...

to all those saying synthesis, isnt that the most interesting one though?


Very little interesting.  Specks of druidism.  But with robots.

Also random, inconsistent with tone of story.

Like watching Saving Private Ryan.  Then Reapers arrive.

#98
t_i_e_

t_i_e_
  • Members
  • 394 messages
Remove all of them. Because as soon as you charge the beam everything goes to sh-t.

#99
Risselda

Risselda
  • Members
  • 298 messages
I wouldnt remove any. I would just elaborate. I think the 3 choices were genius in concept, but too vague in execution. We need closure, not speculation.

#100
stcalvin13

stcalvin13
  • Members
  • 301 messages
The one with the explosions.

{OK, fine, I'll play. Synthesis. I have literally no idea what that did. Joker's now part machine? With brittle circuitry syndrome? Looks like the only difference is now people have to learn to sleep with green light shining in their eyes.}