Congratulations You have ruined conventional; storytelling in games for the future
#51
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:49
For the record, if you like the ending, I dont want it taken away from you. But I am not satisfied and it's my right as a consumer to voice this.
#52
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:49
If you want to talk about ruining a story, talk to the writer who penned that ending.
#53
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:49
HenchxNarf wrote...
I agree with you, OP.
And i will ignore any and every piece of information that will counter the point and just agree with you blindly.... im sorry but what?
#54
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:50
Is their artistic integrity ruined because they have been asked to do what they said they were going to do in the first place?
The answer is no.
If I created a painting and you asked me to change it because you didn't like it, I'd tell you to f**k off as it's my art and my decision.
If you paid me to create a painting and it turned out to be very different from what I repeatedly stated it would be, then you'd have every right to ask me to fix it.
Modifié par Machines Are Us, 22 mars 2012 - 08:51 .
#55
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:50
SandTrout wrote...
Star Wars and the changes that Lucas made to the original Trilogy (against the will of the fans) are actaully a fine example of 'artistic integrity' run amok.zenoxis wrote...
We gave them our money based on promises they made to us. We have every right to demand a better ending. Also see Star Wars (original trilogy) for changes made to a product that has already been released for more information on why this kind of thing has happened already and isn't going to destroy society as we know it.
You're welcome.
/thread
Just because it's run amok once doesn't mean it will again. I have far greater faith in Bioware than I do with Lucas. I only listed Star Wars because it shows the potential to change something even after it's been released and even after so much time has passed.
#56
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:50
#57
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:50
Darknessfalls23 wrote...
I am confuse the ending hasn't even been changed yet, besides all we are doing is pointing out the glaring potholes, the nonsensical reasoning for the Reapers and three Identical choices, that doesn't make you feel like yay Shepard ended his life heroically. Audience job is react to "art".
You and your logically sound arguments are not welcome here!
You just don't understand True Aaaaaaaahhhhhrt.
#58
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:50
#59
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:51
#60
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:51
TheRisenStar wrote...
That Charles Dickens, what a sellout he was. He endangered conventional storytelling forever!
I know! How dare he let Pip have a happish ending! Don't get me started on that sellout Doyle. Really bowing to his fans and bringing back Sherlock. It's not like he was a landmark character or inspired modern fiction.
#61
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:51
#62
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:51
Being humble is not bad sometimes. The final decision rests in Bioware hands, and if they do change the ending, it won't be me pointing fingers and calling names.
Modifié par Lugaidster, 22 mars 2012 - 08:54 .
#63
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:52
Lugaidster wrote...
To the OP. As much as I believe in artistic integrity, I also believe in humble artists. Willingness to improve on feedback should not be looked down upon. The worst part is, it is you, the guys that defend "artistic integrity" the ones that will later look down as if you're somehow superior for being proud of your work.
Being humble is not bad sometimes. The final decision rests in Bioware hands, and if they do change the ending, it won't be me pointing fingers.
This one's playing the good cop.
#64
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:52
I think I misunderstood your position because it's late and I'm tired. I think we are in agreement here.zenoxis wrote...
SandTrout wrote...
Star Wars and the changes that Lucas made to the original Trilogy (against the will of the fans) are actaully a fine example of 'artistic integrity' run amok.zenoxis wrote...
We gave them our money based on promises they made to us. We have every right to demand a better ending. Also see Star Wars (original trilogy) for changes made to a product that has already been released for more information on why this kind of thing has happened already and isn't going to destroy society as we know it.
You're welcome.
/thread
Just because it's run amok once doesn't mean it will again. I have far greater faith in Bioware than I do with Lucas. I only listed Star Wars because it shows the potential to change something even after it's been released and even after so much time has passed.
#65
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:52
#66
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:52
Quietness wrote...
HenchxNarf wrote...
I agree with you, OP.
And i will ignore any and every piece of information that will counter the point and just agree with you blindly.... im sorry but what?
You have your opinion and I have mine. Get over it. I wasn't even talking to you.
#67
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:52
#68
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:53
#69
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:53
#70
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:53
Modifié par Primalrose, 22 mars 2012 - 08:54 .
#71
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:53
zenoxis wrote...
SandTrout wrote...
Star Wars and the changes that Lucas made to the original Trilogy (against the will of the fans) are actaully a fine example of 'artistic integrity' run amok.zenoxis wrote...
We gave them our money based on promises they made to us. We have every right to demand a better ending. Also see Star Wars (original trilogy) for changes made to a product that has already been released for more information on why this kind of thing has happened already and isn't going to destroy society as we know it.
You're welcome.
/thread
Just because it's run amok once doesn't mean it will again. I have far greater faith in Bioware than I do with Lucas. I only listed Star Wars because it shows the potential to change something even after it's been released and even after so much time has passed.
And to be fair we all know Lucas has no idea when to quit or what should or shouldn't be changed. I mean reallly, we just HAD to have that shot of whatever the crap was eating that bug thing outside Jabba's palace in Return?
#72
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:53
Is that you William Shattner?Citizen Q wrote...
I; think; I'm; going; to start putt;ing semi;col;ons randomly; throug;hout all m;y tho;ughts;
#73
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:53
#74
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:53
-Casting a Maxim model/game journalist as a sex kitten/ love interest.
-Using stock pictures for Tali and the backdrop of the ending
-Selling a tie in book fraught with gross errors clearly made by someone who know nothing of the universe
-Tying up one of the greatest video game franchises ever with an ending full of potholes and disrespecting off the entire lore that was developed until then
= Art ?
This is not art, it is a product made by a corporation to make money. It was hyped up by making arguably false promises and people who bought the product and found out that they were deceived are exercising their customer rights.
#75
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 08:53
Hell, we might perfect this rhetorical strategy with the frequency that this hollow defense comes up.Dreogan wrote...
I think this thread qualifies as "blitzkrieg destruction of the because art" argument.





Retour en haut




