Aller au contenu

Photo

IGN says changing ME3s ending is bad for art


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
228 réponses à ce sujet

#1
cipher86

cipher86
  • Members
  • 1 551 messages
but is okay with post-release changes made to Infamous 2's protoganist, in fact Colin Moriarty (the same guy who says changing ME3s ending sets a "bad precedent") says it's a good sign for the industry:

http://ps3.ign.com/a.../1114043p1.html

Here he is bashing the ME3 ending situation:

http://www.metacafe....rous_precedent/

Their opinions are based on who's paying them that day.

Modifié par cipher86, 22 mars 2012 - 03:45 .


#2
Squallypo

Squallypo
  • Members
  • 1 348 messages
ign ppl can go eat chocolate for all i care for :P

#3
ringdrossel

ringdrossel
  • Members
  • 41 messages
... or if you get yourself an ingame character ^^

#4
jamesp81

jamesp81
  • Members
  • 4 051 messages
And not changing them will be bad for business.

In everything, there are tradeoffs.

#5
Mr Indivisible

Mr Indivisible
  • Members
  • 286 messages
they broke their own art.

Simply put, they established their art through three games. The central artistic feature of these three games was to involve the player in the important decision points in the art, affecting the shape and form of the art.

In the final act of Mass Effect 3, they take a dramatic shift away from the established artistic vision, removing all of the players choice->cause->effect relationship with the story, and replacing it with a simplistic non-interactive dialogue, and a basic A,B,C choice all of which end the same. This simple change breaks the prior established artistic values of the game, it stands in sharp contrast to the rest of it, and creates a massive degree of cognitive dissonance in the user. Removing them from affecting the artistic form.

#6
tetrisblock4x1

tetrisblock4x1
  • Members
  • 1 781 messages
IGN can suck my dick.

I wouldn't be surprised if they were been payed under the table or offered ads or other incentives. The dozens of less popular journalists aren't dependable either. Nobody bribes them, but journalism is rather competitive so when they review games and write articles they're primarily concerned with saying whatever they think that the fans want to hear. It helps to boost their readership and makes them popular.

#7
Farbautisonn

Farbautisonn
  • Members
  • 3 083 messages
IGN has zero credibility at this point. Move along.

#8
Accism

Accism
  • Members
  • 74 messages
Colin Moriarty is a hypocrite. He's supported games for listening to fans in the past, as explained by Erik Cane on Forbes:

http://www.forbes.co...native-endings/

Modifié par Accism, 22 mars 2012 - 03:53 .


#9
TheNevincer

TheNevincer
  • Members
  • 226 messages
I'm not even clicking that link because I don't want to give IGN any hits. I'm well and truly done with them.

#10
Blackadderthethird

Blackadderthethird
  • Members
  • 41 messages
It's an entertainment product pieced together by many different art forms. The game itself isn't art

#11
syllogi

syllogi
  • Members
  • 7 242 messages
Colin Moriarty is a jerk who knew where my father was going, but wouldn't tell me until I shook some poor woman down for caps. He also treats his ghoul bartender very poorly.

#12
BobbyDylan

BobbyDylan
  • Members
  • 683 messages
IGN is just scared Bioware might cut their employee out of the game.

#13
Everwarden

Everwarden
  • Members
  • 1 296 messages

tetrisblock4x1 wrote...
I wouldn't be surprised if they were been payed under the table or offered ads or other incentives


Under the table? :lol:

IGN has a character in the game. They're being paid right on top of the table while french kissing and lathering one another in money-sauce.

#14
Chala

Chala
  • Members
  • 4 147 messages
If IGN says that this is a failure...
Then this must be the one of the best decisions that BW has ever made.

#15
Guest_IReuven_*

Guest_IReuven_*
  • Guests
IGNorance. Who gives a **** about them anyway?

#16
Everwarden

Everwarden
  • Members
  • 1 296 messages

BobbyDylan wrote...

IGN is just scared Bioware might cut their employee out of the game.


If Bioware wanted to make fans happy this would be a scene in the upcoming ending DLC:

Diane Allers: "Hey, Shepard, good job killing all the reap-"
Bang!
Shepard: Boom. Headshot. 

#17
Lux

Lux
  • Members
  • 765 messages
Extremely tight deadlines are also bad for art but I guess that's ok for him. And poorly implemented endings are ok too as long as creative control is asserted. Consumers should just to pay, play and shut up. What a wonderful world that is...

#18
HowlingSiren

HowlingSiren
  • Members
  • 599 messages
I just have one word for IGN: whatever.

#19
ManualReplica

ManualReplica
  • Members
  • 286 messages
Ahahah, large casual videogame reviewers, the true kings of contradictions.

#20
sillyrobot

sillyrobot
  • Members
  • 171 messages

Mr Indivisible wrote...

they broke their own art.

Simply put, they established their art through three games. The central artistic feature of these three games was to involve the player in the important decision points in the art, affecting the shape and form of the art.

In the final act of Mass Effect 3, they take a dramatic shift away from the established artistic vision, removing all of the players choice->cause->effect relationship with the story, and replacing it with a simplistic non-interactive dialogue, and a basic A,B,C choice all of which end the same. This simple change breaks the prior established artistic values of the game, it stands in sharp contrast to the rest of it, and creates a massive degree of cognitive dissonance in the user. Removing them from affecting the artistic form.


This.

Plus artistic integrity is not a right or a privilege extended to artists  Fundamentally, artistic integrity is an artist refusing to alter the product away from their vision to please his consumers.  A consumer can't "take away" artistic integrity -- it is internal to the artist.

A consumer can convince the artist to provide a product more in to his liking by bribing/extorting the artist.  The artist has to decide if the change to the product is worth the offer.

But always remember, an artist is a provider.  If he doesn't provide something that the consumer wants, he reaps no reward regardless of the quality or how well the product offered matches the artist's vision. 

Hopefully the artist is objective of his own art so as to not confuse stubbornness with integrity. It is a sad day when an artist refuses to change to a product to bring it more in line with his own vision because he is too proud to see its flaws.

Modifié par sillyrobot, 22 mars 2012 - 04:05 .


#21
Vincent Rosevalliant

Vincent Rosevalliant
  • Members
  • 237 messages
Good find. I'll take your word for it and will not click those links.
Garbage like that deserves to be buried deep into internet anonynity.

#22
Guest_slyguy200_*

Guest_slyguy200_*
  • Guests
It appears that IGN is showing it's true colors about games and gamers, and I don't like what I see. Almost anything that they say on the subject should be ignored.

#23
fwc577

fwc577
  • Members
  • 183 messages
Just goes to show they will look to say anything that will get them a few more hits imo.

#24
batlin

batlin
  • Members
  • 951 messages
To IGN writers, publisher demands = ok for art

fan demands however = bad for art

You can't spell IGNorance without IGN

#25
Annie_Dear

Annie_Dear
  • Members
  • 1 483 messages

syllogi wrote...

Colin Moriarty is a jerk who knew where my father was going, but wouldn't tell me until I shook some poor woman down for caps. He also treats his ghoul bartender very poorly.


Image IPB