Fandango9641 wrote...
Biotic Sage wrote...
You can attack IGN all you want (and some of the attacks are valid). That doesn't make their message of "fans changing the ME3 ending is bad for art" any less true. It is bad for art. It's bad for creative content. It's hard enough these days to find fiction that isn't created for the SOLE purpose of making money and pandering to its audience, something with a soul that rings true. If this is what we have become: a society that forces artists to cater to the whims of every fan, then I am disgusted. This is some kind of dystopia where true art is being completely snuffed out by the masses, ironically killing the very thing they are longing for.
You could trot out that line in defence of any old ****ty ending. Fans disappointed with the game have every right calling out Bioware on their broken promises. Artistic dystopia indeed *phffft*!
Personally I like that there can BE ****ty endings. That means that artists are taking risks, and hitting the right notes with some people while inevitably alienating others. It's better than living in a world of pleasant, safe art where artists create to the lowest common denominator in order to try to please as many people as possible (translation, in order to get as much money from as many people as possible).
You can't have "amazing" without "****ty" as well. There can't be happiness without sadness. The great thing is, if you view a film that you consider ****ty, you can choose never to watch it again! Gravitate toward something you like more. Same with Mass Effect. If you disagree with Bioware's overall vision, play something else. You judged too hastily by liking the first two without comprehending their entire vision. I myself acknowledged that I enjoyed the first two, and had high hopes for the third, but could not commend it as a complete, masterful work since I hadn't experienced the whole thing yet.
Modifié par Biotic Sage, 23 mars 2012 - 11:14 .