Aucune réponse à ce sujet

[Overule]

How do you guys plan to engage Retake ME in discussion? I mean Mr. Hudson's credibility vaporized in the eyes of the fanbase following the release of that 2.99 app that confirmed *every* horrible suspicion about the ending being rushed and last minute, Dr. Ray's "I'm sorry honey, but..." speech was taken as condescending, and Jessica Merizan made the mistake of what's effectively the PR equivalent of throwing a temper tantrum and locking herself into her room for an hour (see the "dinosaurs and candy! weee!!!" posts made recently on this thread: http://social.biowar.../index/10084349 for details).

Guys at some point you need to address our *specific* grievances without prefacing the dialogue with this line:

"We're listening, but our creative team's decisions were wonderful and we find we have done nothing wrong."

And ending with this one:

"We promise nothing. We're listening. We Swear."

Because the simple fact is that the angry and obnoxious people you tend to bring up in your press releases got that way for a reason... they feel cheated. And no, that's not an exaggeration. I know, because it's how I felt. And as long as you keep insisting that what I just said *isn't* the case, either by not adressing it or by deflecting attention from it by cashing in the goodwill of specific employees... people are going to stay angry. And they won't let up >.>

Modifié par Overule, 22 mars 2012 - 04:37 .