Unit-Alpha wrote...
I guarantee that most of the people voting against it never played ME3.
Agreed. Maybe Bioware could poll the actual game owners through Origin?
Unit-Alpha wrote...
I guarantee that most of the people voting against it never played ME3.
tobito113 wrote...
Guys that dosent mean Bioware wont do what you want, but the argument that everyone hates the endings is pretty much useless now.
I agree. This is the only poll I have seen, and there have been many of them, where it was even close to people wanting to keep the endings. Even the IGN poll was hugely lopsided in favor of changing the ending. Even though the results are currently in favor of changing the ending, it should simply be one of many polls used to determine where the public stands. And from what I have seen, the bulk of the public believes the ending should be changed.imtwocats wrote...
tobito113 wrote...
Guys that dosent mean Bioware wont do what you want, but the argument that everyone hates the endings is pretty much useless now.
So 1 poll on Gamefaqs renders all other polls created about the same topic invalid?
I don't think so.
Modifié par Allasae, 22 mars 2012 - 07:26 .
Rickin10 wrote...
What a sh*t poll. Doesn't give you decent options, like, 'yes I think they should change it because it's an atrocity.'
blacqout wrote...
The Night Mammoth wrote...
blacqout wrote...
The Night Mammoth wrote...
blacqout wrote...
Terumitsu wrote...
Another thing about the poll is that it is open to all people and not just those who played ME3. So, the data they are collecting is going to be skewed anyway based on the fact that any regular joe can hit a button. It is not representative of the groups it tries to, well, represent.
No. It's about the larger issue. You don't need to have played the game to have an opinion.
Certtainly not.
But it makes your opinion a whole lot less constructive and valid than the opinion of someone who has.
No it doesn't. You don't need to have played a game in order to believe a developer's right to maintain creative control over its product is sacrosanct, or that the customer is always right.
I'd agree, if this poll didn't refer to Mass Effect, or if it were released in say..... January 2005
It's not like that though. I'd rather people who haven't played the game refrain from commenting on whether Bioware do something about a situation that doesn't concern them.
Well, the bad news is that you're wrong. The good news is that if you can find enough to people to agree with you and whine loudly enough, you might be able to retake the GameFAQ poll.
It should be obvious that Mass Effect is mentioned because of the current controversy. It's the only reason the issue is being discussed at all.
So, let me get this straight. This movement is supposedly about respecting everyones opinion, but still pushing forward your opinion.AwesomeDudex64 wrote...
That is such a ****ty poll.
blacqout wrote...
Jeb231 wrote...
I don't understand how you can be arguing this.
It's because i can read properly.
Considering you can vote more then once and the results are not accurate by any mean, no matter wich side "wins" it is a "****ty" poll.Crusina wrote...
So, let me get this straight. This movement is supposedly about respecting everyones opinion, but still pushing forward your opinion.AwesomeDudex64 wrote...
That is such a ****ty poll.
Yet every single time someone disagrees, publicaly speaks against it, or you have a poll where you loss, you post it here complaining about how they are wrong, gang up on them, and complain how you are misunderstood and everyone else is clearly wrong.
You have no less then 20 threads about what levine said, and all of its about how he's clearly wrong for speaking his mind on the matter. Whats it matter to you what he thinks? he's entitled to it, just as you're entitled to think he's wrong. But he doesn't post it in his game forums saying "look at these idiots trash talk them.
There are thousands, no probably tens of thousands of great retake people, then people like you come along and act like some weird cult whenever someone speaks against the great movement.
FyreFlyeRush wrote...
blacqout wrote...
Jeb231 wrote...
I don't understand how you can be arguing this.
It's because i can read properly.
Good grief, I read that in Garrus' voice.
Modifié par FarynUEA, 22 mars 2012 - 08:08 .
FarynUEA wrote...
cal·i·brate (kl-brt)
tr.v. cal·i·brat·ed, cal·i·brat·ing, cal·i·brates
1. To check, adjust, or determine by comparison with a standard (the graduations of a quantitative measuring instrument): calibrate a thermometer.
2. To determine the caliber of (a tube).
3. To make corrections in; adjust
And you do nothing of that sort ...
blacqout wrote...
FarynUEA wrote...
cal·i·brate (kl-brt)
tr.v. cal·i·brat·ed, cal·i·brat·ing, cal·i·brates
1. To check, adjust, or determine by comparison with a standard (the graduations of a quantitative measuring instrument): calibrate a thermometer.
2. To determine the caliber of (a tube).
3. To make corrections in; adjust
And you do nothing of that sort ...
5
: to measure precisely; especially: to measure against a standard
- Merriam Webster http://www.merriam-w...onary/calibrate
Language is my business. I wouldn't attempt to correct me when it comes to the written word ever again.
NReed106 wrote...
blacqout wrote...
FarynUEA wrote...
cal·i·brate (kl-brt)
tr.v. cal·i·brat·ed, cal·i·brat·ing, cal·i·brates
1. To check, adjust, or determine by comparison with a standard (the graduations of a quantitative measuring instrument): calibrate a thermometer.
2. To determine the caliber of (a tube).
3. To make corrections in; adjust
And you do nothing of that sort ...
5
: to measure precisely; especially: to measure against a standard
- Merriam Webster http://www.merriam-w...onary/calibrate
Language is my business. I wouldn't attempt to correct me when it comes to the written word ever again.
Oh **** we got a bad*** over here, he'll destroy your grammar