The fact of the matter is the ending is the only major issue with Mass Effect 3, and that seems to be the general consensus. And you shouldn't rate a game on a single part of it. So while the reviews are good for the game as a whole, there can still be a legitimate gripe with a part of it. And when that gripe is with the part of the game that is supposed to wrap up 3 entire games worth of decisions and story, with Bioware boasting for months and months that there would be VASTLY DIFFERENT endings that incorporate your choices, it isn't selling out when you decide to fix that. It would be a slap in the face if they ignored their fans now at the end when our feedback and feelings are about the most IMPORTANT part of the series: the ending.
The game, not including the ending, is perfect in my mind. It was the perfect balance of RPG and shooter elements, the perfect hybrid of ME1 and ME2 gameplay styles. Many of the annoying bugs were fixed (like where you'd randomly start walking on invisible platforms that you couldn't get down from in ME1 and 2), and they did a great job incorporating the choices made in ME1 and ME2 into the storylines and important moments in ME3.
But the endings were completely out of place and did not feel like part of the series. I think it would be a disservice to the series as a whole and to all the gamers who invested, in some cases, hundreds of hours to perfect their Shepards and their decisions over the course of 3 games to have it all come down to endings that, in addition to being full of plot and character holes, don't provide the player with TRUE closure for their Renegade, Paragon, or middle ground Shepards without confusing M. Night Shyamalan-esque "twists" or misdirection. If you are a Paragon your entire way from ME1 to ME3, you should be given the OPTION to see that perfect ending you were striving for, with no strings attached. The same goes for Renegade or any other combination of the two and the choices you made which leads up to the Shepard you bring into that ending.
A game built so heavily on the player's ability to choose different paths and the tough decisions those paths force you to make, should not end with a glaringly obvious LACK of those key elements. Saying Bioware is "selling out" because they feel an obligation to address fan concerns is stupid. The fans MADE IT POSSIBLE to have anything past Mass Effect 1 (poor sales would not have allowed for ME2 or 3) so how is it selling out to cater to their expectations? Especially after Bioware hyped up the ending so much only to universally disappoint their fans? If anything, Gamespot is selling out and catering to EA, the huge Big Brother of video games that has gobbled up all these companies while pushing games out the door before they are ready so they can cash in faster. Bioware wants to give their gamers the ending they want, most likely as free upgrade or free DLC, which is exactly what EA wouldn't want to happen. They want then working on Mass Effect 4 - 10 and making them more money, not going back and fixing a game that has already put $ in their pocket.
Modifié par MoldySpore, 22 mars 2012 - 06:23 .