Nageth wrote...
IsaacShep wrote...
That is assuming they were primarly concerned about lying the ground for a sequel. A rather bold assumption. Frankly, to me, it looked like they wanted to ensure there won't be a sequel. The fact that you can literally make every living being in the galaxy have VISIBLE synthetic parts in one ending and not in another 2 makes it virtually impossible to create a sequel to these endings.Nageth wrote...
Why create a dark age if you're not going to have your next game be on the back end of it? If you're just going to have the mass relays be rebuilt and everything mostly back to normal for the next triology why blow them up in the first place?
They've been rather vocal about keeping the Mass Effect IP alive after they killed Shepard. My assumption was future and not past.
And if the Protheans already created a mass relay I doubt it would be that much of a stretch for the current cycle to make them too.
As far as the endings, I pretty much just assumed synthesis would be non-canon and they'd either have all the reapers vaporized or otherwise leave the galaxy to explain the absense of them. So yes, I was making an assumption regarding the endings (and any new game would have to be many many years).
The Protheans never completed the Relay, and they were far more advanced than this cycle.
Also this cycle's top scientists are dead or scattered, armies are stuck, places that would need aid to rebuild won't be getting it, there's no way to coordinate building two relays nevermind all of them, any needed materials would be next to impossible to get... and on top of that the Destroy ending kills most advanced technology. Yeah there's no building of the relays. They killed the series regardless of your choices and I fully expect any future games to be in the past.
I also interpreted the child/grandfather scene as the legend being passed down and the kid curious if life existed outside the galaxy.
Modifié par nevar00, 23 mars 2012 - 04:02 .





Retour en haut




