Stargazer scene is 10,000 years after the game
#51
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:26
#52
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:26
The Angry One wrote...
dointime85 wrote...
Evolution? Sure, too fast, but ME1-3 haven't been exactly great on biology, anyways. Why the hell not?
Because the Asari have been breeding with other species for more than 10,000 years and it makes no sense?
A very limited genepool leads to some very disturbing developments
#53
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:27
Artistic integrity broKhayness wrote...
For extra insult, google "space winter" and marvel at those scenes.
BioWare sure does love stock photos.
#54
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:28
#55
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:28
#56
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:29
KingNothing125 wrote...
How you go from large adult silhouette + miniature adult silhouette to "Child from Liara's melding in London carried on Shepards bloodline?" is quite a leap. Too bad there aren't any logic olympics.
It's called desperately clinging to a wild notion.
#57
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:29
The link to it is on his twitter feed, so it's definitely from gibbed and I don't think he'd make something like this up.
EDIT: Ah, didn't notice the first post had been updated a while back, oops!
Modifié par Mcjon01, 22 mars 2012 - 06:30 .
#58
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:30
No way they're that ignorant of their own lore.
#59
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:30
#60
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:30
Giskler wrote...
Lots of speculation for everyone!
i read two other posts then this. it was fun lol
#61
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:31
Asnine112 wrote...
Please, reread the text. It says it might look a little bit Asari, maybe a little bit human. The silhouettes of both are almost identical. People are reading waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay to much into this
Yeah because they were cheap.
The notes also mention a vision of Anderson taking the destroy option, which I don't remember seeing.
The implication however is clear, if they look human and Asari what do you think they meant? That they're parrot people?
#62
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:31
I don't think that means anything. If you look at the rest of the log it's all very shorthand. What interests me is that it takes place 10,000 years after the events of the game, and that the child is either Asari or human. That's interesting
Edit: @The Angry One, Starchild shows you a vision of Anderson taking the Destroy option and TIM taking the Control option, so that part is accurate.
Modifié par Rockpopple, 22 mars 2012 - 06:32 .
#63
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:31
wait, what?
#64
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:31
Modifié par CheeseEnchilada, 22 mars 2012 - 06:32 .
#65
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:32
#66
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:32
Machines Are Us wrote...
That scene should never have existed in the first place. Clichéd and out of place is the only way to describe it.
I disagree. What everyone wants is a cliched ending, and they didn't get it.
#67
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:32
The Angry One wrote...
Asnine112 wrote...
Please, reread the text. It says it might look a little bit Asari, maybe a little bit human. The silhouettes of both are almost identical. People are reading waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay to much into this
Yeah because they were cheap.
The notes also mention a vision of Anderson taking the destroy option, which I don't remember seeing.
The implication however is clear, if they look human and Asari what do you think they meant? That they're parrot people?
anderson taking the destroy option is in the game.
#68
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:32
#69
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:32
The Angry One wrote...
Asnine112 wrote...
Please, reread the text. It says it might look a little bit Asari, maybe a little bit human. The silhouettes of both are almost identical. People are reading waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay to much into this
Yeah because they were cheap.
The notes also mention a vision of Anderson taking the destroy option, which I don't remember seeing.
The implication however is clear, if they look human and Asari what do you think they meant? That they're parrot people?
When you talk to godchild you see Anderson shooting the red tubes and TIM trying to control the blue beam thing. Its the sepia flashback thing.
#70
Guest_Guest12345_*
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:33
Guest_Guest12345_*
#71
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:33
The Angry One wrote...
Asnine112 wrote...
Please, reread the text. It says it might look a little bit Asari, maybe a little bit human. The silhouettes of both are almost identical. People are reading waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay to much into this
Yeah because they were cheap.
The notes also mention a vision of Anderson taking the destroy option, which I don't remember seeing.
The implication however is clear, if they look human and Asari what do you think they meant? That they're parrot people?
I'm not debating whether or not it was cheap or whatever.
All I'm saying is that people are getting up in arms over something for really no reason. Yes, let's all get really mad because of vague statements.
Like the poster above said, the most interesting thing is that it's 10k years in the future (and they haven't made it back to space??!?!?!) and the child is either Asari or human.
#72
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:33
sadako wrote...
half asari half human? They just wrecked their own lore.
Maybe should just give up. They killed the franchise totally.
Lol if they suddenly said this were true, I do not think there are enough facepalm pictures on the entire internet that can depict how I'd feel.
#73
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:33
Liara put time capsules out all over the galaxy. This planet found one. We are in the next cycle. It does not violate any lore. The ending is Shepard Loses, Reapers wipe out all life at the tech level for culling and move on.
#74
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:33
1: Shepard frowns
2: Shepard looks around... see the where he could DESTROY. Flash to a scene of Anderson shooting the RED wires.
3: Shepard looks around... see the where he could CONTROL. Flash to a scene of the IM Grabbing hold of the BLUE energy."
LOL
I laughed a lot at that 1. Shepard frowns.
Yeah, I hear you bro.
#75
Posté 22 mars 2012 - 06:34
Or...I got nothing...





Retour en haut




