ME Twitter Says;
#226
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:51
I'll take it as a victory. I've been holding the line like a bastard, but damn.
#227
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:51
Drxx wrote...
Abirn wrote...
That's what I wanted. It was never about getting a "happy" ending, its about getting an ending that isn't filled with plotholes and explains the whole catalyst/reaper thing in more detail.
Speak for yourself.
I want happy ending
Man, my words exactly. Why after all the hard work can't we get a happy ending with Shepard and a lot of blue babies ?
#228
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:53
You can't clarify mud. The fact that they're sticking to this word is a pretty clear signal: after careful consideration we've decided every idea we borrowed and shoehorned in is pure gold so we're going to explain why you just don't get it.Lankist wrote...
No amount of clarity is going to make space child any more tolerable. None.
I was really hoping not to be an ex-customer.
#229
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:53
#230
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:53
#231
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:53
If they don't address this and instead choose to polish the current turd of an ending then I will be dissatisfied.
#232
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:54
So bioware plz expand what I'm doing after I wake up under some rubble.
#233
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:54
The Smitchens wrote...
Man. Bioware just can't win, can they? It's not like they specifically said what they're going to do with the new content. They've announced they're going to do something. It's not like they're going to divulge every last spoiler or even if they've fully committed to one specific direction to go. They're probably still weighing options, but at the least have decided to take some sort of action.
I'll take it as a victory. I've been holding the line like a bastard, but damn.
Bioware can win.
Easily. Not betraying entire game series to push philosophical message at last minute.
#234
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:55
Instead I think it is more reasonable to ask/hope for two things
Additional scenes explaining and expanding on the endings. What should be accomplished in this is to fill in plotholes, makes the endings more different from each other (show us the impact and effect they had), show more scenes with the other characters (giving more closure) and scenes showing the outcome some of our other choices. Also perhaps have a scene showing Shepard and LI reuniting in the ending where Shepard lives.
Then, in addition to this, add a couple of new endings. That way there are more choices and more outcomes, both good and bad. (something that would be beneficial to both people who liked the endings and those who didn't)
These two things would not only benefit those of us who dislike the endings (by giving closure and some more choices), while not upseting the people who were okay with the endings. This would be the most beneficial solution to all invovled.
#235
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:55
Guys, have some people who have played all 3 games play your new ending before you release it. You have to learn that lesson: just because you don't give a toss about the lore and the plot, doesn't mean your customers are as ambivalent as you. We paid money for this.
Make it right.
#236
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:55
#237
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:56
TheWerdna wrote...
Honestly, I never expected Bioware to change the endings, that would be unfair to the people who did like them (no matter how much I or anyone else hates the endings, that would be selfish on our part)
Instead I think it is more reasonable to ask/hope for two things
Additional scenes explaining and expanding on the endings. What should be accomplished in this is to fill in plotholes, makes the endings more different from each other (show us the impact and effect they had), show more scenes with the other characters (giving more closure) and scenes showing the outcome some of our other choices. Also perhaps have a scene showing Shepard and LI reuniting in the ending where Shepard lives.
Then, in addition to this, add a couple of new endings. That way there are more choices and more outcomes, both good and bad. (something that would be beneficial to both people who liked the endings and those who didn't)
These two things would not only benefit those of us who dislike the endings (by giving closure and some more choices), while not upseting the people who were okay with the endings. This would be the most beneficial solution to all invovled.
I just gotta ask - who would force people to download, install and play alternative ending DLCs?
Modifié par Seryndras, 23 mars 2012 - 05:56 .
#238
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:56
#239
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:56
#240
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:56
thegame30 wrote...
Scalpels wrote...
I do not need clarity. I'm pretty sure its clear what occurs.
You control the Reapers.
You synthesize everyone into a homogeneous life forms without their consent
You destroy the Reapers and commit genocide against the Geth plus you murder your own friend
Regardless of the above you either vaporize billions/trillions in an instant as the Mass Relays blow or you doom billions/trillions to slow death by lack of supply due to the trade network being destroyed.
The problem is that Priority:Earth does not reflect the choices Shepard made. And choosing any of the three colors is Shepard giving up his (and the rest of the galaxies's) free will.
"Clarifying" things won't change the above.
To clarify: I want an ending that is the result of all the major decisions Shepard made.
Well said.
Thank you. I think it is a testament to the writers at Bioware that I can feel so passionately about a fictional universe. But the ending as it stands does them no favors.
#241
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:57
spacefiddle wrote...
I have a sinking feeling it's going to be "clarity to address concerns" like, "We understand people feel bad because they destroyed the Galaxy due to the implications of Relay destruction in Arrival. To clarify, these explosions are not the same due to Space Magic. You no longer have to feel bad about instantly wiping out trillions. Stop asking what the Turians eat."
That'll be ten dollars.
Plus tip.
#242
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:57
#243
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:57
They are not the small developer that listens and cares anymore. That is for certain. No matter how many times they try to convince you all that they still are. They are arrogant, dismissive and have repeatedly treated fans like tools. They sit there and smile as fans continuously blame EA for the decsions that BW makes. Wake up and smell the coffee people. They don't care unless they can make money!!!!!
#244
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:58
#245
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:58
But bioware is a buisness, and if the DLC will be payed for, they are going to make something that people who liked the ending would also buy.Seryndras wrote...
TheWerdna wrote...
Honestly, I never expected Bioware to change the endings, that would be unfair to the people who did like them (no matter how much I or anyone else hates the endings, that would be selfish on our part)
Instead I think it is more reasonable to ask/hope for two things
Additional scenes explaining and expanding on the endings. What should be accomplished in this is to fill in plotholes, makes the endings more different from each other (show us the impact and effect they had), show more scenes with the other characters (giving more closure) and scenes showing the outcome some of our other choices. Also perhaps have a scene showing Shepard and LI reuniting in the ending where Shepard lives.
Then, in addition to this, add a couple of new endings. That way there are more choices and more outcomes, both good and bad. (something that would be beneficial to both people who liked the endings and those who didn't)
These two things would not only benefit those of us who dislike the endings (by giving closure and some more choices), while not upseting the people who were okay with the endings. This would be the most beneficial solution to all invovled.
I just gotta ask - who would force people to downloadm install and play alternative ending DLCs?
Now, I would much prefer a complete rewrite of the endings, I just don't think that is a very realistic possibility. As such I have placed my expecations and hopes on something much more likely.
#246
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:58
crimzontearz wrote...
I do not get it...explain to me WHY I should take their word on anything without ANY specifics on it
There's the possibility that they don't have specifics yet. They've gotten a lot of feedback from this. What feedback do they consider? What do they disregard?
Vromrig wrote...
The Smitchens wrote...
Man.
Bioware just can't win, can they? It's not like they specifically
said what they're going to do with the new content. They've announced
they're going to do something. It's not like they're going to divulge
every last spoiler or even if they've fully committed to one specific
direction to go. They're probably still weighing options, but at the
least have decided to take some sort of action.
I'll take it as a victory. I've been holding the line like a bastard, but damn.
Bioware can win.
Easily. Not betraying entire game series to push philosophical message at last minute.
That seems to be unavoidable at this point. But they've announced they're handling it. I'm not suffereing from Stockholm syndrome here. They've said they're going to heed our requests and give us something new.
#247
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:59
The Smitchens wrote...
Man. Bioware just can't win, can they? It's not like they specifically said what they're going to do with the new content. They've announced they're going to do something. It's not like they're going to divulge every last spoiler or even if they've fully committed to one specific direction to go. They're probably still weighing options, but at the least have decided to take some sort of action.
I'll take it as a victory. I've been holding the line like a bastard, but damn.
when you had your fanbase a steamy pile of dog crap for an ending and proclaim how "proud you are of it" and deliberately go back on promises made regarding the game you lose a lot of goodwill. Bioware can earn back alot of faith from it's customers but right now they have to understand that anything they say/do is going to be viewed VERY sceptically until we get the full release of information.
It's like if bioware came out and said "we're adding new dialog to the ending to please our fans!' and people got excited because they were going to give us the chance to question starchild, only to get the DLC and find out the added dialog is Anderson ordering a pizza right before the final battle. We need more info before bioware gets the "You're the man now dawg!" treatment.
#248
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:00
Guys, have some people who have played all 3 games play your new ending before you release it. You have to learn that lesson: just because you don't give a toss about the lore and the plot, doesn't mean your customers are as ambivalent as you. We paid money for this.
Make it right.
#249
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:01
It's clear who they're really reaching out to here. They've decided to blind themselves. It's a damn shame. Returning my copy now.
#250
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:02
For some reason I don't think they meant the ending to be construed as 'Shephard destroying the entire galaxy with his last decision'. It was just poor presentation.





Retour en haut




