PR speak.
ME Twitter Says;
Débuté par
robbyiscool
, mars 23 2012 05:05
Retour en haut
#27
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:10
mupp3tz
-
- Members
- 2 469 messages
When this content comes out, then we'll actually see if they were "listening." I have a bad feeling that it will be more along the lines of Bioware defending themselves than actually taking fan critique into consideration. -- i.e., "No, you guys got it all wrong. This is why it's awesome!"
Modifié par M U P P 3 T Z, 23 mars 2012 - 05:11 .
#28
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:10
DreamTension
-
- Members
- 470 messages
Also note that this may not be all negative
Clarification = more details, more explanation, less plotholes and inconsistencies.
Closure = real endings to this wonderful gaming experiences that depend on your action.
I'm hopelessly optimistic. Love you Bioware!!! Please?
Clarification = more details, more explanation, less plotholes and inconsistencies.
Closure = real endings to this wonderful gaming experiences that depend on your action.
I'm hopelessly optimistic. Love you Bioware!!! Please?
#29
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:10
E-Type XR
-
- Members
- 414 messages
So, they throw us an Olive Branch and we are going to flat out fight against it, rather than consider it?
Sometimes I hate being on the same side as idiots.
Sometimes I hate being on the same side as idiots.
#30
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:11
txmn1016
-
- Members
- 3 704 messages
Welsh Inferno wrote...
ME twitter says a lot of things.
Lol, sorry to say it, but this.
#31
Guest_BringBackNihlus_*
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:11
Guest_BringBackNihlus_*
Guest_BringBackNihlus_*
-
- Guests
As Miranda would say on the Collector Ship, "this is disconcerting."
#32
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:11
Purple People Eater
-
- Members
- 1 382 messages
Is everybody on the rag all the time on this board?. This should be seen as a positive thing. Nowhere in that quote did it imply that they weren't listening, or that specific complaints weren't going to be addressed. Some people complain about Bioware using PR speak to pacify them, but Bioware cant say anything without it being unfairly dissected. nobody knows what they have planned, and being negative just for the sake of it (which this place excels at) does no one any good.
Modifié par Purple People Eater, 23 mars 2012 - 05:12 .
#33
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:11
crimzontearz
-
- Members
- 16 779 messages
screw it....what's the point of even bothering? I should just return the goddamn game for store credit
#34
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:11
Panicomatic
-
- Members
- 386 messages
They can't change the ending, you know this, right?
They can build on, expand on, add to, but cannot change the ending. If they changed the ending it would make investors very nervous. Why? Because it would be an admission that the game's ending was wrong. Best they can do is clarify what happened in the ending. Which best case scenario IMO would be that Shepard was fighting indoctrination and then we get a real ending.
They are meeting us halfway.
They can build on, expand on, add to, but cannot change the ending. If they changed the ending it would make investors very nervous. Why? Because it would be an admission that the game's ending was wrong. Best they can do is clarify what happened in the ending. Which best case scenario IMO would be that Shepard was fighting indoctrination and then we get a real ending.
They are meeting us halfway.
#35
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:12
Xion66
-
- Members
- 305 messages
I just had a flashback of the Genesis DLC and some datapads, and shivered in fear.
#36
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:12
txmn1016
-
- Members
- 3 704 messages
DreamTension wrote...
Also note that this may not be all negative
Clarification = more details, more explanation, less plotholes and inconsistencies.
Closure = real endings to this wonderful gaming experiences that depend on your action.
I'm hopelessly optimistic. Love you Bioware!!! Please?
I know how you feel. I love BW too. However, if it is anything short of the above stated, I will be watching it on Youtube.
#37
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:12
77boy84
-
- Members
- 868 messages
Yeah, they're not listening. This is pretty much proof of that.
They can clarify and explain all they want, it wont make the ending better. It'll just add pointless details to something that shouldn't have happened.
They can clarify and explain all they want, it wont make the ending better. It'll just add pointless details to something that shouldn't have happened.
#38
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:12
Bantz
-
- Members
- 1 033 messages
If all we get is a codex entry explaining how space magic works or some cheesy text saying "the other races started the long voyage home" i'm going to be even more pissed.
#39
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:12
TheJediSaint
-
- Members
- 6 637 messages
Eh, if Bioware can make the ending make sense, I'll be satisfied.
#40
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:12
The Angry One
-
- Members
- 22 246 messages
Purple People Eater wrote...
Is everybody on the rag all the time on this board?. This should be seen as a positive thing. No where in that quote did it imply that they weren't listening, or that specific complaints weren't going to be addressed. Some people complain about Bioware using PR speak to pacify them, but Bioware cant say anything without it being unfairly dissected. nobody knows what they have planned, and being negative just for the sake of it (which this place excels at) does no one any good.
It is not a positive thing. It is a sign that they intend to throw us a bone and not take us seriously.
If they end up doing this, then I am DONE with them for good.
#41
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:12
Fingertrip
-
- Members
- 1 192 messages
They hint about Indoctrination.
Indoctrination Theory is solid.
They said they will provide "clarifaction" (Regarding Indoctrination that seemed to slip so many oblivious peoples mind, this is a definitive case for new players)
Closure = DLC, what happends next?
Indoctrination Theory is solid.
They said they will provide "clarifaction" (Regarding Indoctrination that seemed to slip so many oblivious peoples mind, this is a definitive case for new players)
Closure = DLC, what happends next?
#42
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:12
ElectronicPostingInterface
-
- Members
- 3 789 messages
Good luck, Bioware.
#43
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:12
dfstone
-
- Members
- 602 messages
Hope they do something about ghost kid. Its always a great literary device to add a character in the last chapter that has never been in the book before...not.
#44
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:12
cuzsal
-
- Members
- 264 messages
i think depending on how they deal with this, they just might lose a huge chunk of there hardcore fanbase, me being one
i hope i am wrong and they come out with a ending that is epic
i hope i am wrong and they come out with a ending that is epic
#45
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:12
Electric Pig
-
- Members
- 99 messages
Translation: "we're going to talk out our ass and attempt to make sense of our bull****"
I dont want the current endings. Barley anyone does. They're not worthy of the series. I want alternative endings to be made and i'll happily pay for them. :|
I dont want the current endings. Barley anyone does. They're not worthy of the series. I want alternative endings to be made and i'll happily pay for them. :|
#46
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:13
tjmax
-
- Members
- 494 messages
Its about understanding what they wanted to tell us.
was the intention to kill all life all along and the adam and eve scene the new beginning for all life?
the god child did say you would loose everything..
or was it all a dream that we will wake from?
are we now part of the machine?
who knows when they are ready they will tell us.
was the intention to kill all life all along and the adam and eve scene the new beginning for all life?
the god child did say you would loose everything..
or was it all a dream that we will wake from?
are we now part of the machine?
who knows when they are ready they will tell us.
#47
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:13
Edrick1976
-
- Members
- 474 messages
If they dont change the ending then I think BioWare as a gamming company is done.
#48
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:13
Xion66
-
- Members
- 305 messages
Panicomatic wrote...
They can't change the ending, you know this, right?
They can build on, expand on, add to, but cannot change the ending. If they changed the ending it would make investors very nervous. Why? Because it would be an admission that the game's ending was wrong. Best they can do is clarify what happened in the ending. Which best case scenario IMO would be that Shepard was fighting indoctrination and then we get a real ending.
They are meeting us halfway.
The thing is clarification does not mean expanding/build om/add to, to me clarification is closer to fill in the obvious gaps.
#49
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:13
RLesueur
-
- Members
- 517 messages
This is a good thing. Some people are just never satisfied. :/
#50
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 05:13
Robhuzz
-
- Members
- 4 976 messages
Abirn wrote...
That's what we wanted. It was never about getting a "happy" ending, its about getting an ending that isn't filled with plotholes and explains the whole catalyst/reaper thing in more detail.
One of their major promises was that we would get 16 different endings all based on how well you did during the game and your past decisions. 16 endings in which Shepard dies would be...fail. Like the current ending.
They can clarify and explain all they want, it wont make the ending better. It'll just add pointless details to something that shouldn't have happened.
I wish them good luck explaining something that makes absolutely no sense and goes against the lore they established years ago.
Modifié par Robhuzz, 23 mars 2012 - 05:15 .
